Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) x > 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other, then divide by the coefficient of x; dividing by a positive number leaves the sign as it is. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 4x + 1 > 2x + 9 gives 2x + 1 > 9; subtracting 1 from both sides gives 2x > 8; dividing both sides by 2 gives x > 4. Answer: x > 4. The distractors: x < 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 2; x > 5 comes from adding the 1 to the 9 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x > 10; x < 5 comes from making both of those mistakes together.
- (a) 38 — Method: substitute the position number into the rule and follow the order of operations, so the squaring is carried out before the 2 is added. Working: n = 6 gives 6² + 2; 6² means 6 × 6 = 36, and then 2 is added to 36. Answer: 38. The distractors: 14 comes from multiplying the position by 2 instead of squaring it, 6 × 2 + 2; 36 comes from squaring correctly and then forgetting to add the 2; 64 comes from adding the 2 first and squaring afterwards, (6 + 2)².
- (b) b = a/5 — Writing 5b means 5 × b, so b has been multiplied by 5. The inverse of multiplying by 5 is dividing by 5, and dividing both sides by 5 gives a/5 = b, which is written b = a/5. Multiplying both sides by 5 instead gives 5a, which applies the operation a second time; treating the 5 as though it were added gives a − 5; writing 5/a turns the fraction upside down.
- (a) 3x — Method: "three times as old" is a multiplication by 3, applied to the age that is known in terms of the letter. Working: the brother's age is x, and Leo's age is 3 × x, which is written as 3x. Answer: 3x. The distractors: x + 3 comes from reading "three times as old" as "three years older" and adding instead of multiplying; x − 3 comes from reading it as "three years younger" and subtracting; x/3 comes from dividing by 3 instead of multiplying, which describes the brother in terms of Leo rather than Leo in terms of the brother.
- (b) 20 — The rate is the gradient: the change in litres divided by the change in time. From 2 to 7 minutes, the tank gains 150 − 50 = 100 litres over 7 − 2 = 5 minutes, so the rate is 100 ÷ 5 = 20 litres per minute. 100 comes from working out the change in litres but forgetting to divide by the change in time. 25 comes from using only the first reading, 50 ÷ 2, and ignoring the second reading entirely. 0.05 comes from dividing the change in time by the change in litres instead of the other way round, 5 ÷ 100.
- (c) h = V / (lw) — Method: undo the multiplication by lw by dividing both sides by lw. Working: V = lwh, so dividing both sides by lw gives h = V / (lw). The value h = V − lw comes from subtracting lw instead of dividing by it. The value h = Vlw comes from multiplying by lw instead of dividing. The value h = lw / V comes from inverting the fraction, dividing lw by V instead of V by lw.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (a) (n − 5)/2 — Method: do the subtraction first, keep it together as a single bracket, then divide that whole bracket by 2. Working: 'subtract 5 from n' is (n − 5); 'divide the result by 2' means the whole bracket goes over 2, giving (n − 5)/2. Answer: (n − 5)/2. n/2 − 5 comes from dividing n by 2 first and only then subtracting 5, the wrong order. 2(n − 5) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. (5 − n)/2 comes from subtracting n from 5 instead of subtracting 5 from n, the wrong way round.
- (c) 100 — Method: apply the position-to-term rule straight to the position asked for, since it does not depend on the term before it. Working: the rule squares the position number and the position is 10, so the term is 10², which means 10 × 10. Answer: 100. The distractors: 81 comes from squaring 9 instead of 10, one position short; 20 comes from multiplying the position by 2 instead of squaring it; 1000 comes from cubing the position, 10 × 10 × 10, instead of squaring it.
- (b) 192 — This is a geometric sequence with first term 3 and common ratio 4: round 2 has 3 × 4 = 12, round 3 has 12 × 4 = 48, round 4 has 48 × 4 = 192. A candidate who applies the ×4 multiplier four times instead of three gets 3 × 4⁴ = 768. A candidate who wrongly treats the growth as arithmetic, taking the round 2 figure of 12 as a fixed amount added each round, gets 3, 15, 27, 39. A candidate who forgets the starting 3 people and just works out 4⁴ gets 256.
- (c) x + 18 — Expand −3(2x − 6) by multiplying both terms by −3: −3 × 2x = −6x and −3 × (−6) = 18, giving 7x − 6x + 18 = x + 18. Writing x − 18 comes from not flipping the sign of the −6 inside the bracket, so −3 × (−6) is treated as −18 instead of +18. Writing x + 6 comes from forgetting to multiply the −6 by 3, only carrying its sign. Writing 13x − 18 comes from treating the whole bracket as being added rather than subtracted, so 3(2x − 6) = 6x − 18 is added to 7x.
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (d) 12 — Method: call the younger brother's age x, write the elder brother's age in terms of x, and form an equation from the total. Working: the elder brother is x + 6, so x + (x + 6) = 30; simplifying gives 2x + 6 = 30, subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 24, and dividing by 2 gives x = 12. Checking: 12 and 18 add up to 30 and differ by 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 18 comes from solving correctly and then giving the elder brother's age, which is not the age asked for; 15 comes from halving 30 and ignoring the 6-year difference altogether; 24 comes from taking 6 off the total, 30 − 6 = 24, and giving that as an age.
- (a) 55 − 5n — The number of chairs decreases by 5 in each row after the first, so the common difference is d=−5, and the first term is a=50. The nth term is a+(n−1)d = 50+(n−1)(−5) = 50−5n+5 = 55−5n. A candidate who uses the common difference as the constant term instead of correctly finding 55, giving the constant as −5 instead, would write −5n−5. A candidate who uses the first term, 50, as the coefficient of n instead of the common difference, would write 50n−5. A candidate who does not multiply the common difference by n at all, treating the nth term as n+d instead of dn+c, would write n−5.
- (b) £2.00 — Subtracting the second equation from the first eliminates the pastries: (3c + 2p) − (2c + 2p) = 9.60 − 7.60, so c = 2.00. A candidate who divides the first total by the number of coffees alone, ignoring the pastries, would get 9.60 ÷ 3 = £3.20. A candidate who finds the price of a pastry instead of a coffee — using c = 2.00 in 2c + 2p = 7.60 to get p = 1.80 — would answer £1.80. A candidate who reaches the correct difference of £2.00 but then mistakenly divides again or misplaces the decimal point would get £0.20.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.