Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 3, 6, 9, 12 — Method: substitute the positions n = 1, 2, 3 and 4 into the rule in turn, because a position-to-term rule gives each term from its own position number. Working: 3 × 1 = 3, 3 × 2 = 6, 3 × 3 = 9 and 3 × 4 = 12. Answer: 3, 6, 9, 12. The distractors: 3, 9, 27, 81 comes from reading 3n as 3 multiplied by itself n times and so multiplying by 3 at every step; 0, 3, 6, 9 comes from starting the count at n = 0, which shifts every term one place; 4, 5, 6, 7 comes from reading 3n as n + 3 and adding 3 to each position number instead of multiplying by 3.
- (c) 37 — The first differences are 3, 5, 7, 9 — they increase by 2 each time (the second difference), so the next first difference is 11, giving 26+11=37. A candidate who repeats the last first difference (9) instead of increasing it would reach 26+9=35. A candidate who increases the difference by 4 instead of 2 would reach 26+13=39. A candidate who adds only the second difference (2) to the last term, instead of the next first difference, would reach 26+2=28.
- (c) 8 — Method: substitute x = 3 into each expression in turn, working out the bracket first in the expression that has one and the multiplication first in the expression that does not. Working: 2(x + 1) gives 2 × (3 + 1) = 2 × 4 = 8, and 2x + 2 gives 2 × 3 + 2 = 6 + 2 = 8, so both expressions take the value 8, as Grace claims. Answer: 8. The distractors: 7 comes from multiplying only the x inside the bracket and then adding the 1, giving 2 × 3 + 1; 10 comes from reading 2x + 2 as 2(x + 2) and working out 2 × 5; 6 comes from substituting into 2x and stopping before the 2 is added.
- (a) x/5 — Read the decimal as a fraction first: 0.2 is 2 tenths, so the coefficient is 2/10. Dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 cancels this to 1/5, and a coefficient of 1/5 in front of a letter is written x/5. Reading the digit 2 as 'a half' gives x/2; reading 0.2 as 1/20 gives x/20; dividing only the denominator by 2 leaves 2/5, which is the coefficient 0.4 and twice as large as it should be.
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (d) Isla is right, because 5 + 1 = 6 — Method: put the input through the machine yourself, then compare what comes out with the output claimed, and check that the reason given with the verdict is itself true. Working: the machine adds 1 to whatever is put in, so an input of 5 gives 5 + 1 = 6, which is exactly the output claimed. Answer: Isla is right, and the reason is that 5 + 1 = 6. The distractors: the statement that the machine adds 1 to its output describes a different machine — this one adds 1 to what goes in — so the verdict is right but the reason is false; 5 − 1 = 4 comes from running the machine backwards and subtracting instead of adding; 5 × 1 = 5 comes from reading ‘adds 1’ as ‘multiplies by 1’, which leaves the input unchanged.
- (c) w/6 — Method: a ÷ b is written as a fraction a/b, with the number being divided (w) on top. Working: w ÷ 6 = w/6. Answer: w/6. 6/w comes from writing the numbers the wrong way round, putting the 6 on top instead of w. 6w comes from reading the ÷ sign as ×, multiplying instead of dividing. w − 6 comes from reading ÷ as −, subtracting instead of dividing.
- (a) The equation has one solution; the inequality has many. — Method: solve each statement. From 2x + 3 = 11, 2x = 8, so x = 4 — a single value. From 2x + 3 > 11, 2x > 8, so x > 4 — every number greater than 4 makes the inequality true, so there are many solutions. So the equation has one solution and the inequality has many. Distractor origins: swapping the two round gives the range to the equation and the single value to the inequality; saying both have exactly one solution treats the > sign as if it were an = sign; saying both have many solutions treats the equation as if it were an inequality.
- (d) x = 7 or x = −7 — Method: take the square root of both sides, remembering a square root can be positive or negative. Since x² = 49, x = √49 or x = −√49, so x = 7 or x = −7. Distractor origins: x = 7 forgets the negative root; x = −7 keeps only the negative root and drops the positive one; x = 24.5 comes from dividing 49 by 2 instead of taking a square root.
- (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
- (b) x = 4 — Method: every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate, so its equation sets x equal to a number, and that number is the x-coordinate of any point known to be on the line. Working: the line is vertical and passes through (4, 7), whose x-coordinate is 4, so every point on the line has x-coordinate 4 and the equation is x = 4. Answer: x = 4. The distractors: y = 7 is the horizontal line through the same point, obtained by fixing the y-coordinate instead of the x-coordinate; x = 7 uses the right form but takes the y-coordinate of the point rather than its x-coordinate; y = 4x treats the 4 as a gradient and gives a sloping line through the origin, which does not pass through (4, 7) at all.
- (b) 3n + 1 — Method: find how many more tiles each pattern uses, then find the constant by adjusting pattern 1's total. Working: each pattern uses 3 more tiles than the last, so the coefficient of n is 3. The constant is pattern 1's total minus the common difference: 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: the nth term is 3n + 1. 3n + 4 comes from using pattern 1's total, 4, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 3n − 2 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (4 − 3 − 3 = −2) instead of once. n + 3 comes from swapping the common difference and the constant.
- (c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
- (a) (2, 7) — Midpoint = ((x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2) = ((−3+7)/2, (5+9)/2) = (4/2, 14/2) = (2, 7). (4, 14) comes from adding the coordinates correctly but forgetting to divide by 2. (2, 9) comes from correctly averaging the x-coordinates but simply copying the y-coordinate of the second point instead of averaging the y-coordinates. (5, 2) comes from subtracting the coordinates instead of adding them before halving: ((7−(−3))/2, (9−5)/2) = (5, 2).
- (c) x + 18 — Expand −3(2x − 6) by multiplying both terms by −3: −3 × 2x = −6x and −3 × (−6) = 18, giving 7x − 6x + 18 = x + 18. Writing x − 18 comes from not flipping the sign of the −6 inside the bracket, so −3 × (−6) is treated as −18 instead of +18. Writing x + 6 comes from forgetting to multiply the −6 by 3, only carrying its sign. Writing 13x − 18 comes from treating the whole bracket as being added rather than subtracted, so 3(2x − 6) = 6x − 18 is added to 7x.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.