Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) −1 — Method: in the form y = mx + c the gradient m is the number multiplying x, and an x term written with no number in front of it has a coefficient of 1. Working: y = −x + 3 is the same equation as y = (−1)x + 3, so comparing it with y = mx + c gives m = −1 and c = 3. Answer: −1. The distractors: 1 comes from taking the coefficient as 1 and leaving the minus sign out of the answer; 3 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −3 comes from moving the minus sign across to the constant term and then reading the gradient off that term instead of the x term.
- (a) 30 US dollars — £24 is 6 times £4, and the same scale factor applies to US dollars, so multiply 5 by 6: 5 × 6 = 30, giving 30 US dollars. Multiplying £24 by 4/5, the pounds-per-dollar ratio, instead of by 5/4, the dollars-per-pound ratio, gives 24 × 4/5 = 19.2, applying the ratio the wrong way round and giving 19.20 US dollars. Adding the extra £20 straight onto the 5 as if £1 equalled 1 US dollar, 5 + 20 = 25, gives 25 US dollars. Multiplying £24 by 5 without first dividing by the original £4, 24 × 5 = 120, gives 120 US dollars.
- (d) 6 — Method: a value satisfies x ≥ 7 when it is greater than 7 or exactly equal to 7, so test each value against the boundary. Working: 8 is greater than 7 and 100 is greater than 7, so both satisfy the inequality; 7 is equal to the boundary and ≥ includes equality, so 7 satisfies it as well; 6 is less than 7, so 6 is the one value that fails. Answer: 6. The distractors: 7 is chosen by candidates who read ≥ as a strict 'greater than' and so shut the boundary value out of the solution set; 8 is chosen by reading the question as asking which value DOES satisfy the inequality and taking the smallest such value; 100 is chosen by the same misreading, taking instead the value furthest above the boundary.
- (c) 2 — The output is the input plus 6: −4 + 6 = 2. A candidate who subtracts 6 instead of adding it gets −4 − 6 = −10. A candidate who ignores the negative sign on the input and works out 4 + 6 gets 10. A candidate who multiplies the input by 6 instead of adding gets −4 × 6 = −24.
- (d) 128 — In 2p³ the index belongs to p only, so cube p first and multiply by the coefficient afterwards. Cubing gives 4 × 4 × 4 = 64, and then 2 × 64 = 128. Cubing the coefficient as well would mean working out (2 × 4)³, which is 512. Reading the index as an instruction to multiply by 3 gives 2 × 4 × 3 = 24, and ignoring the coefficient altogether leaves 64.
- (a) 6b − 5 — Method: sort the expression into terms in b and number terms, then collect each kind, keeping the sign in front of every term. Working: the b terms give 2b + 2b + 2b = 6b; the number terms are −1 and −4, and −1 − 4 = −5. Answer: 6b − 5. The distractors: 6b − 3 comes from working out the difference 4 − 1 instead of adding two negative numbers; 6b + 5 comes from adding 1 and 4 while ignoring both minus signs; 8b − 5 comes from multiplying the coefficients 2, 2 and 2 instead of adding them.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (c) −8 — (−2)³ = (−2) × (−2) × (−2) = −8, since multiplying three negative numbers gives a negative result. A candidate who forgets the sign of a negative number when cubing it might treat (−2)³ as if it were 2³ = 8. A candidate who multiplies −2 by 3 instead of cubing it might get −2 × 3 = −6. A candidate who combines both mistakes — multiplying by 3 and dropping the sign — might get 2 × 3 = 6.
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
- (d) (0, 4) — Method: in the form y = mx + c the constant c is the y-coordinate of the point where the line crosses the y-axis, and every point on that axis has x-coordinate 0. Working: comparing y = 2x + 4 with y = mx + c gives c = 4, and substituting x = 0 confirms y = 2 × 0 + 4 = 4, so the crossing point is (0, 4). Answer: (0, 4). The distractors: (4, 0) is the same pair of numbers written in the wrong order and is a point on the x-axis; (0, 2) comes from reading the gradient 2 as the intercept, confusing m with c; (−2, 0) is where the line crosses the x-axis, found by solving 0 = 2x + 4 instead.
- (b) 37 — The terms are 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 37 — each found by adding 6 to the term before, so the 6th term is 37. Adding 6 six times to the first term instead of five times, 7 + 6 × 6 = 43, treats the first term as if it were before the sequence starts. Stopping one term early gives the 5th term, 31. Stopping two terms early gives the 4th term, 25.
- (c) 3 and 2n + 5 are both factors of 6n + 15 — Factors are the parts multiplied together to make an expression; terms are the parts added together. In 3(2n + 5) the 3 and the bracket 2n + 5 are multiplied, so both of them are factors of 6n + 15. The parts added together are 6n and 15, and those are its two terms, not its factors. A factor need not be a number: a bracket containing letters is a factor in exactly the same way.
- (d) 3 — The expression has three terms separated by + and − signs: 4x², −7x and 3. A candidate who thinks a number on its own does not count as a term says there are 2 terms, missing the 3. A candidate who miscounts the minus sign as creating an extra term says there are 4. A candidate who splits each term into its coefficient and letter part separately (4, x², 7, x, 3) says there are 5.
- (c) 5(x + y − 1) — Method: take out the highest common factor of all three terms and divide every term by it, the number term included. Working: the highest common factor of 5x, 5y and −5 is 5; dividing gives 5x ÷ 5 = x, 5y ÷ 5 = y and −5 ÷ 5 = −1, so the bracket holds x + y − 1. Answer: 5(x + y − 1), which multiplies back out to 5x + 5y − 5. The distractors: 5(x + y + 1) comes from dividing −5 by 5 and losing the minus sign; 5(x + y − 5) comes from dividing only the terms containing a letter by 5 and carrying the −5 into the bracket unchanged; 5(xy − 1) comes from collecting the unlike terms 5x and 5y as 5xy before factorising.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.