Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 6x + 6 — Perimeter = 2[(2x + 5) + (x − 2)] = 2(3x + 3) = 6x + 6. A candidate who adds the length and width but forgets to double for the perimeter gets 3x + 3. A candidate who makes a sign error and adds 2 instead of subtracting it before doubling gets 2[(2x + 5) + (x + 2)] = 6x + 14. A candidate who multiplies the length and width instead of adding them, confusing the perimeter formula with the area formula, and then doubles that product, gets 2(2x + 5)(x − 2) = 4x² + 2x − 20.
- (c) 3 — Method: a point that lies on a graph makes its equation true, so substituting the coordinates into y = mx + 6 leaves an equation in m alone. Working: substituting x = −2 and y = 0 gives 0 = m × (−2) + 6, which rearranges to −2m = −6, so m = (−6) ÷ (−2) = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: −3 comes from dividing −6 by 2 and keeping the minus sign, overlooking that the divisor is negative too, so the two signs cancel; −2 comes from writing down the x-coordinate of the given point in place of the gradient; 6 comes from reading the constant in y = mx + 6 as the gradient, confusing m with c.
- (c) x ≥ 3 — Method: collect the number terms first; the x term is negative, so the final step multiplies both sides by −1, and that is the one step that turns the inequality sign round. Working: subtracting 5 from both sides of 5 − x ≤ 2 gives −x ≤ −3; multiplying both sides by −1 turns −x into x and −3 into 3, and because the multiplier is negative the ≤ becomes ≥, so x ≥ 3. Answer: x ≥ 3. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from multiplying by −1 without turning the sign round, the commonest slip on this type; x ≤ −3 comes from reading −x ≤ −3 as though the minus sign could simply be rubbed off the left-hand side; x ≥ −3 comes from turning the sign round correctly but leaving the right-hand side at −3 instead of multiplying it by −1 as well.
- (d) 45 — v = s ÷ t = 180 ÷ 4 = 45 km/h. 720 comes from multiplying s and t instead of dividing, 180 × 4. 184 comes from adding s and t instead of dividing, 180 + 4. 176 comes from subtracting t from s instead of dividing, 180 − 4.
- (c) y = 2 — Method: substituting Noah's value shows why it fails, and the equation is then solved by undoing the addition. Working: substituting y = 3 gives 3 + 10 = 13, which is not 12, so Noah's value is not a solution; subtracting 10 from both sides of y + 10 = 12 gives y = 2, and substituting back gives 2 + 10 = 12. Answer: y = 2. The distractors: y = 22 comes from adding 10 to both sides instead of subtracting it; y = −2 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, 10 − 12 rather than 12 − 10; y = 12 comes from copying the right-hand side as the value of y and ignoring the 10 that is added to it.
- (a) £50 — Substituting x = 200 into y = 0.15x + 20 gives y = 0.15 × 200 + 20 = 30 + 20 = £50. A candidate who forgets to add the standing charge would get only 0.15 × 200 = £30. A candidate who misplaces the decimal point in the rate, using 1.5 instead of 0.15, would get 1.5 × 200 + 20 = £320. A candidate who swaps the roles of the rate and the number of units would work out 0.15 × 20 + 200 = £203.
- (d) x = 5 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 5, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 5x + 15 = 40; subtracting 15 from both sides gives 5x = 25; dividing both sides by 5 gives x = 5. Answer: x = 5. The distractors: x = 8 comes from dividing both sides by 5 first, reaching x + 3 = 8 and writing 8 as the value of x without taking the 3 away; x = 11 comes from adding 15 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 5x = 55; x = 7.4 comes from expanding 5(x + 3) as 5x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 5, which leads to 5x = 37.
- (c) 71 — Method: square x first, then multiply by 3, then subtract 4, following the order of operations. Working: x² = 5² = 25; 3 × 25 = 75; 75 − 4 = 71. Answer: 71. 221 comes from squaring (3x) as a whole first: (3 × 5)² = 225, then − 4 = 221, squaring the coefficient along with x. 75 comes from correctly working out 3x² but forgetting to subtract the 4. 3 comes from subtracting the 4 from x before squaring: (5 − 4)² × 3 = 3, doing the operations in the wrong order.
- (b) 25 — Substitute n = 7: 4 × 7 − 3 = 28 − 3 = 25. Forgetting to subtract 3 gives 4 × 7 = 28. Subtracting 3 from 7 before multiplying by 4, 4 × (7 − 3) = 16, applies the operations in the wrong order. Substituting n = 8 by miscounting the position gives 4 × 8 − 3 = 29.
- (a) 3y² — There is one 3 in the product and the letter y appears twice. A number that multiplies a letter is written in front of it as the coefficient, so the 3 goes at the front. The two ys multiply each other, so the letter carries an index of 2. The shortest correct way of writing the product is therefore 3y². Note that (3y)² would mean 3 × y × 3 × y, which squares the coefficient as well, while 3 + y² turns a multiplication into an addition and y³ treats the coefficient as a third factor of y.
- (d) £40 — Method: add the two prices to make one expression in x, turn 'at least' into ≥, solve the inequality, then read the lowest possible price off the boundary of the solution set. Working: the two items cost x + (2x + 30) = 3x + 30 pounds, so 3x + 30 ≥ 150; subtracting 30 from both sides gives 3x ≥ 120; dividing both sides by 3 gives x ≥ 40, and the smallest value the shirt price is allowed to take is the boundary, £40. Answer: £40. The distractors: £50 comes from leaving the £30 out of the total and solving 3x ≥ 150; £60 comes from using the trousers expression on its own, 2x + 30 ≥ 150; £120 comes from stopping at 3x ≥ 120 and reading the 120 as the price of the shirt without dividing by 3.
- (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
- (a) 2 m/s² — Method: acceleration = change in speed ÷ time = (17 − 5) ÷ 6 = 12 ÷ 6 = 2 m/s². Distractor origins: 12 m/s² stops after finding the change in speed and forgets to divide by the time; 22 m/s² adds the two speeds instead of subtracting them, and also forgets to divide by time (5 + 17 = 22); 72 m/s² multiplies the change in speed by the time instead of dividing (12 × 6 = 72).
- (b) 60 km/h — Method: the gradient of a distance-time graph is the change in distance divided by the change in time, and for a journey at a steady rate that gradient is the speed. Working: the change in distance is 195 − 15 = 180 km and the change in time is 3 hours, so the gradient is 180 ÷ 3 = 60 km/h. Answer: 60 km/h. The distractors: 180 km/h comes from stopping at the change in distance and never dividing by the 3 hours; 195 km/h comes from reading the final marker as the rate instead of working with the change between the two markers; 3 km/h comes from quoting the time taken, which belongs on the bottom of the fraction, as though it were the value of the fraction itself.
- (a) They always charge the same, since 3(2n + 4) = 6n + 12. — Expand Advert A's formula by multiplying both terms inside the bracket by 3: 3 × 2n = 6n, and 3 × 4 = 12, giving 3(2n + 4) = 6n + 12, which is identical to Advert B's formula — so the two adverts always charge the same amount, whatever n is. Getting 6n + 4 comes from multiplying the 2n by 3 but leaving the 4 unmultiplied. Getting 2n + 7 comes from adding 3 to the bracket instead of multiplying by it. Saying it depends on n avoids expanding the bracket at all — once expanded, both formulas are identical for every value of n, so the cost can be compared directly.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.