Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
- (c) 3 — Substituting y = 3 into 4x − y = 9 gives 4x − 3 = 9, so 4x = 12, and x = 3. A candidate who adds 3 instead of subtracting it, making a sign error when substituting, would get 4x + 3 = 9, so 4x = 6 and x = 1.5. A candidate who forgets to divide by 4 after finding 4x = 12 would write x = 12. A candidate who subtracts 4 instead of dividing by it would get 12 − 4 = 8.
- (a) £14.50 — Method: the first 200 minutes are already covered by the £12, so only 250 − 200 = 50 minutes are charged extra. Extra charge = 50 × £0.05 = £2.50. Total cost = £12 + £2.50 = £14.50. Distractor origins: £24.50 charges 5p for all 250 minutes instead of only the 50 minutes over 200 (250 × £0.05 = £12.50, plus £12 = £24.50); £12.50 makes that same slip of charging all 250 minutes but then forgets to add the £12 monthly fee; £13.50 works out 250 − 200 wrongly as 30 extra minutes instead of 50 (30 × £0.05 = £1.50, plus £12 = £13.50).
- (d) 3, 6, 12, 24 — Method: a term-to-term rule is applied to the term just written, so start with the first term and use the rule three more times. Working: the first term is 3; 3 × 2 = 6 is the second; 6 × 2 = 12 is the third; 12 × 2 = 24 is the fourth. Answer: 3, 6, 12, 24. The distractors: 3, 5, 7, 9 comes from adding 2 each time instead of multiplying by 2; 3, 9, 27, 81 comes from multiplying by the first term, 3, instead of by the multiplier 2 the rule gives; 6, 12, 24, 48 comes from doubling before writing anything down, so the list starts one term too late and the given first term is missing.
- (a) 4x + 2 — Expand the bracket: 4(x − 2) = 4x − 8. Then add the 10 that follows the bracket: 4x − 8 + 10 = 4x + 2. The option 4x − 8 comes from expanding the bracket correctly but then forgetting to add the 10. The option 4x + 8 comes from forgetting to multiply the 2 inside the bracket by 4 (treating it as 4x − 2 instead of 4x − 8), then adding 10. The option 4x + 18 comes from a sign error when expanding — treating 4 × (−2) as +8 instead of −8, giving 4x + 8, then adding 10.
- (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
- (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
- (a) It is 2(w + (w + 3)) = 4w + 6, not 2w + 3. — The perimeter of a rectangle is twice the width plus twice the length: 2 × w + 2 × (w + 3) = 2w + 2w + 6 = 4w + 6, so the gardener's 2w + 3 is wrong. Writing w + (w + 3) = 2w + 3 forgets to double the sides at all, only adding one width and one length once. Writing 4(w + 3) = 4w + 12 wrongly treats all four sides as equal to the length, as if the garden were a square. Writing 3w + 6 comes from doubling the length correctly but adding the width only once instead of doubling it too.
- (c) 71 — Method: square x first, then multiply by 3, then subtract 4, following the order of operations. Working: x² = 5² = 25; 3 × 25 = 75; 75 − 4 = 71. Answer: 71. 221 comes from squaring (3x) as a whole first: (3 × 5)² = 225, then − 4 = 221, squaring the coefficient along with x. 75 comes from correctly working out 3x² but forgetting to subtract the 4. 3 comes from subtracting the 4 from x before squaring: (5 − 4)² × 3 = 3, doing the operations in the wrong order.
- (c) x = −2 or x = 7 — Method: each factor equals zero in turn. From x + 2 = 0, x = −2. From x − 7 = 0, x = 7. So x = −2 or x = 7. Distractor origins: x = 2 or x = −7 flips both signs the wrong way; x = −2 or x = −7 wrongly makes both solutions negative; x = 2 or x = 7 ignores the signs in the brackets completely.
- (b) (−2, 0) — Method: a graph meets the x-axis where the y-value is 0, so setting y = 0 turns the equation into a linear equation in x. Working: 0 = 3x + 6 gives 3x = −6, so x = (−6) ÷ 3 = −2 and the meeting point is (−2, 0). Answer: (−2, 0). The distractors: (2, 0) comes from solving 3x = −6 and then dropping the minus sign from the result; (0, 6) is the y-axis crossing, found by substituting x = 0 instead of y = 0; (6, 0) comes from reading the constant 6 straight off as the x-coordinate, without dividing by 3 and without changing its sign.
- (c) x ≤ 4 — Subtract 9 from both sides: −2x ≥ 1 − 9 = −8. Divide both sides by −2, flipping the inequality: x ≤ 4. A candidate who divides by −2 but forgets to flip the inequality gets x ≥ 4. A candidate who divides −8 by −2 but keeps a negative sign gets x ≤ −4. A candidate who miscalculates 1 − 9 as −10 gets x ≤ 5.
- (d) m³n — m × m × m × n means three m's multiplied together, then multiplied by n, which is written as m³n. Putting the power of 3 on n instead of m, mn³, puts the power on the wrong letter. Writing 3mn treats the repeated multiplication as if it were repeated addition, as if it meant 3 × m × n. Writing m³ + n adds the n instead of multiplying it in.
- (b) 23 — Term 1 is 2. Term 2 = 2 × 2 + 1 = 5. Term 3 = 2 × 5 + 1 = 11. Term 4 = 2 × 11 + 1 = 23. A candidate who doubles each term but forgets to add 1 gets 2, 4, 8, 16. A candidate who adds 1 before doubling at each step (the wrong order) gets 2, 6, 14, 30. A candidate who forgets to add 1 only on the final step gets 2 × 11 = 22.
- (b) 21 — Method: find the gap between neighbouring terms, then add one gap to the last term that is known. Working: 9 − 5 = 4, 13 − 9 = 4 and 17 − 13 = 4, so 4 is added each time; the 5th term is one step on from the 4th term, so it is 17 + 4. Answer: 21. The distractors: 25 comes from adding the 4 twice and landing on the 6th term; 20 comes from multiplying the position by the common difference, 5 × 4, and ignoring the fact that the sequence starts at 5 rather than at 4; 22 comes from adding the first term, 5, to 17 instead of adding the common difference.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.