Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) y decreases towards zero but never reaches it — Method: as x gets larger, dividing 20 by a bigger number gives a smaller result, so y decreases; because 20/x can never be exactly zero for any positive x, the curve gets closer to zero without ever reaching it, so y decreases towards zero but never reaches it. Distractor origins: 'y increases towards a limit but never reaches it' has the relationship backwards, treating y as increasing when it is actually decreasing; 'y decreases at a steady rate and reaches zero' wrongly assumes the graph behaves like a straight line that eventually hits zero; 'y stays the same however large x becomes' wrongly assumes there is no change in y at all.
- (c) 7 — To reverse the rule, subtract the constant then divide by the coefficient: 30−2=28, then 28÷4=7, so n=7. A candidate who adds the constant instead of subtracting it, a sign error when rearranging, would compute (30+2)÷4=32÷4=8. A candidate who subtracts the constant correctly but then forgets to divide by the coefficient would stop at 30−2=28. A candidate who treats 4n+2 as a single term 6n, adding the coefficient and constant together, would compute 30÷6=5.
- (d) $y = 2x - 1$ — Method: pick two points the line passes through, work out the gradient as vertical change ÷ horizontal change, and read the y-intercept from where the line crosses the y-axis. Working: the line passes through (0, −1) and (1, 1), so the gradient is (1 − (−1)) ÷ (1 − 0) = 2, and it crosses the y-axis at −1. Answer: y = 2x − 1. Distractor refutation: y = 2x + 1 comes from reading the y-intercept as +1 instead of −1, misreading which side of the origin the line crosses. y = x − 1 comes from taking the gradient as 1, counting the same number of squares across and up instead of checking the rise is twice the run. y = −2x − 1 comes from a sign error on the gradient, treating the line as sloping downward from left to right when it actually rises.
- (b) 20 — The rate is the gradient: the change in litres divided by the change in time. From 2 to 7 minutes, the tank gains 150 − 50 = 100 litres over 7 − 2 = 5 minutes, so the rate is 100 ÷ 5 = 20 litres per minute. 100 comes from working out the change in litres but forgetting to divide by the change in time. 25 comes from using only the first reading, 50 ÷ 2, and ignoring the second reading entirely. 0.05 comes from dividing the change in time by the change in litres instead of the other way round, 5 ÷ 100.
- (c) (0, 0) — A curve crosses the y-axis where x = 0. Substituting x = 0 into y = x³ − 4x gives y = 0³ − 4(0) = 0 − 0 = 0, so the curve crosses the y-axis at (0, 0). A candidate who reads off the coefficient of x as the y-intercept, instead of working out the constant term, might write (0, −4). A candidate who swaps the coordinates might write (4, 0). A candidate who takes the coefficient of x but drops its sign might write (0, 4).
- (d) 28 cm — Method: rate = 12 cm ÷ 3 min = 4 cm per minute. Depth after 7 minutes = 4 × 7 = 28 cm. Distractor origins: 84 cm multiplies the given depth by 7 directly, without first finding the rate per minute (12 × 7 = 84); 24 cm simply doubles the given depth instead of scaling correctly by the ratio of times; 16 cm combines the numbers with subtraction and addition (12 − 3 + 7 = 16) instead of finding a rate.
- (b) P = 4s — A formula is a rule connecting two or more different quantities, so that one of them can be worked out once the others are known. P = 4s does exactly that: it gives P from s. The line with no equals sign is an expression; the line with an equals sign and a single unknown letter is an equation, because it is solved to find that letter; the line joined by a comparison sign is an inequality.
- (d) a/2 — Method: write both terms over the same denominator, subtract the numerators, then cancel the fraction down. Working: 6 is a multiple of 3, so a/3 is rewritten as 2a/6; the calculation becomes 5a/6 − 2a/6 = 3a/6, and dividing numerator and denominator by 3 gives a/2. Answer: a/2. The distractors: 4a/3 comes from subtracting the denominators as well as the numerators, giving (5 − 1)a over (6 − 3); 2a/3 comes from subtracting 1 from 5 without first rewriting a/3 as 2a/6, giving 4a/6; 7a/6 comes from adding the two fractions instead of subtracting them, giving 5a/6 + 2a/6.
- (b) b = a/5 — Writing 5b means 5 × b, so b has been multiplied by 5. The inverse of multiplying by 5 is dividing by 5, and dividing both sides by 5 gives a/5 = b, which is written b = a/5. Multiplying both sides by 5 instead gives 5a, which applies the operation a second time; treating the 5 as though it were added gives a − 5; writing 5/a turns the fraction upside down.
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (b) (0, −2) — Method: a translation acts on the two coordinates separately: moving right or left changes the x-coordinate only, moving up or down changes the y-coordinate only, and right and up add while left and down subtract. Working: the point starts at (−4, 7); moving 4 units to the right gives an x-coordinate of −4 + 4 = 0; moving 9 units down gives a y-coordinate of 7 − 9 = −2. Answer: (0, −2). The distractors: (5, 3) comes from pairing each number with the wrong coordinate, adding 9 to −4 and taking 4 from 7; (0, 16) comes from treating 'down' as an addition, giving 7 + 9 = 16 for the second coordinate; (−8, −2) comes from treating 'to the right' as a subtraction, giving −4 − 4 = −8 for the first coordinate.
- (c) x = (y + 24)/4 — Method: expand the bracket first, then undo the operations done to x in reverse order. Working: y = 4(x − 6) = 4x − 24, so y + 24 = 4x, so x = (y + 24)/4. Answer: x = (y + 24)/4. x = (y + 6)/4 comes from expanding the bracket incorrectly, treating 4(x − 6) as 4x − 6 instead of 4x − 24. x = 4y + 96 comes from multiplying by 4 instead of dividing by 4 to undo the multiplication, giving 4(y + 24) = 4y + 96. x = y/4 − 6 comes from dividing by 4 first without expanding the bracket, then subtracting 6 as if the bracket's operation still applied afterwards.
- (a) (2, 7) — Midpoint = ((x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2) = ((−3+7)/2, (5+9)/2) = (4/2, 14/2) = (2, 7). (4, 14) comes from adding the coordinates correctly but forgetting to divide by 2. (2, 9) comes from correctly averaging the x-coordinates but simply copying the y-coordinate of the second point instead of averaging the y-coordinates. (5, 2) comes from subtracting the coordinates instead of adding them before halving: ((7−(−3))/2, (9−5)/2) = (5, 2).
- (a) 130 — Method: substitute the total bill into the formula, then subtract the fixed charge and divide by the cost per text message. Working: 24.50 = 18 + 0.05t, so 0.05t = 24.50 − 18 = 6.50, t = 6.50 ÷ 0.05 = 130. Answer: 130 extra text messages. 490 comes from dividing the whole bill by 0.05 without first subtracting the £18 fixed charge: 24.50 ÷ 0.05 = 490. 13 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.5 instead of 0.05, moving the decimal point one place too far: 6.50 ÷ 0.5 = 13. 65 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.1 instead of 0.05.
- (a) False — 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, not 8x − 3. — Expand the bracket by multiplying both terms by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, which is not 8x − 3 — the student is wrong. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 3 comes from multiplying only the 2x by 4 and copying the −3 across unchanged. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 2x − 12 comes from multiplying only the −3 by 4 and leaving 2x unmultiplied. Claiming it is true because both expressions are linear ignores that equivalence depends on the actual coefficients, not the type of expression.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.