Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
- (a) Subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. — Method: try to solve the equation as normal and see what happens. Working: subtract 4x from both sides: 4x + 3 − 4x = 4x + 10 − 4x, giving 3 = 10. This statement is false for every value of x, so the equation has no solution. Answer: subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. "x would have to be negative" invents a constraint on x that the equation never states. "It's true for every x" confuses this equation with an identity, where both sides would simplify to the same expression. "x = 7" misreads the false statement 3 = 10 as something to solve for x, rather than recognising it means no solution exists.
- (b) 1 — Method: replace the letter with its value, work out the multiplication first and the subtraction afterwards. Working: 3n = 3 × 1 = 3, so the expression becomes 3 − 2, which is 1. Answer: 1. The distractors: 3 comes from substituting into 3n but stopping before the 2 is taken away; −1 comes from subtracting the wrong way round and working out 2 − 3; 5 comes from adding the 2 instead of subtracting it, giving 3 + 2.
- (b) £14 — Method: read the fixed charge (the cost at 0 miles) and the rate (the cost per extra mile) from the graph, then use them to work out the cost for a distance beyond the part that is plotted. Working: the graph shows a fixed charge of £2 at 0 miles, and the cost rises by £2 for every extra mile, so for 6 miles the cost is £2 + (£2 × 6) = £2 + £12 = £14. Answer: £14. Distractor refutation: £12 comes from multiplying the rate by the distance and leaving out the £2 fixed charge. £8 comes from misreading the rate as £1 per mile instead of £2 per mile. £24 comes from adding the fixed charge to the rate first and then multiplying the total by the distance, instead of multiplying the rate by the distance and then adding the fixed charge.
- (b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
- (d) 28 — The height decreases by 8 cm at each bounce after the first, so the nth bounce reaches 60−(n−1)×8 cm. For the 5th bounce: 60−4×8=60−32=28. A candidate who subtracts 8 one time too many, five times instead of four, would compute 60−5×8=20. A candidate who adds the decrease instead of subtracting it, a sign error, would compute 60+4×8=92. A candidate who works out only the total decrease and forgets to include the starting height of 60 cm would compute just 5×8=40.
- (d) V = lwh — V = lwh is a formula: it relates one quantity, the volume V, to others, the length, width and height, in a way that is true generally. A candidate who picks lwh has chosen the expression, not a full statement relating two quantities. A candidate who picks lwh = 60 has chosen an equation, since it is only true for particular values of l, w and h that multiply to 60. A candidate who picks 2(l + w) ≡ 2l + 2w has chosen an identity, mistaking the identity symbol ≡ for a sign that makes a statement a formula.
- (b) 23 — Term 1 is 2. Term 2 = 2 × 2 + 1 = 5. Term 3 = 2 × 5 + 1 = 11. Term 4 = 2 × 11 + 1 = 23. A candidate who doubles each term but forgets to add 1 gets 2, 4, 8, 16. A candidate who adds 1 before doubling at each step (the wrong order) gets 2, 6, 14, 30. A candidate who forgets to add 1 only on the final step gets 2 × 11 = 22.
- (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
- (b) k − 5 — Method: the width is 5 less than the length, so subtract 5 from the length. Working: length − 5 = k − 5. Answer: k − 5. 5 − k comes from subtracting in the wrong order, taking the length away from 5 instead of the other way round. k + 5 comes from adding instead of subtracting, missing that the width is smaller than the length. 5k comes from multiplying the length by 5 instead of subtracting 5 from it.
- (a) −7 — The coefficient of xy is the number multiplying that exact term, including its sign: in 4x²y − 7xy + 2, the term in xy is −7xy, so the coefficient is −7. Answering 7 correctly picks out the number but drops the minus sign that belongs to it. Answering 4 picks the coefficient of the x²y term instead of the xy term — x²y and xy are different terms because their powers of x differ. Answering −5 combines −7 with the constant term +2, as though the coefficient of xy included the number with no letter attached to it. The coefficient of xy is −7.
- (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
- (b) 3 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c first, then read off the gradient. Working: dividing 4y = 12x + 20 by 4 gives y = 3x + 5, so the gradient is 3. The value 12 comes from reading the coefficient of x before dividing the equation by 4. The value 20 comes from using the constant term of the unsimplified equation instead of the gradient. The value 5 comes from finding the y-intercept, 20 / 4 = 5, and giving that instead of the gradient.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.