Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) a formula — A statement that shows how to calculate one quantity from others, using an equals sign, is a formula. P = 2l + 2w tells us how to work out the perimeter, P, from the length and width, so it is a formula. Distractor origins: 'an equation' confuses a formula linking several letters with an equation solved for one unknown value; 'an identity' confuses a formula with a statement that is true for every value of a single variable; 'an expression' forgets that an expression has no equals sign at all.
- (a) 36 — Square numbers are n² for n = 1, 2, 3, ...; the fifth term, 25, is 5². The sixth square number is 6² = 36. A candidate who mislabels 25 as the sixth square number would compute 7² = 49 instead. A candidate who repeats an earlier difference between terms (5, from 4 to 9) rather than the correct next difference (11, since the differences are the odd numbers 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) would reach 30. A candidate who instead adds 10 would reach 35.
- (d) 3x² + 4x − 7 — Method: the minus sign in front of the second bracket changes the sign of every term inside it; then collect like terms. Working: removing the brackets gives 5x² + 3x − 2 − 2x² + x − 5; the squared terms give 5x² − 2x² = 3x², the x terms give 3x + x = 4x, and the number terms give −2 − 5 = −7. Answer: 3x² + 4x − 7. The distractors: 7x² + 2x + 3 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting, giving 5x² + 2x², 3x − x and −2 + 5; 3x² + 2x + 3 comes from applying the minus sign to 2x² only, leaving −x and +5 unchanged so that 3x − x = 2x and −2 + 5 = 3; 3x² + 4x + 3 comes from changing the signs of the terms with letters but leaving +5 as it stood, so the number terms give −2 + 5 = 3.
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
- (d) 6 — Method: rearrange the formula to make d the subject, then substitute C = 133. Working: C = 25 + 18d, so subtracting 25 from both sides gives C − 25 = 18d, then dividing by 18 gives d = (C − 25) / 18. Substituting C = 133: d = (133 − 25) / 18 = 108 / 18 = 6. The value 7.4 comes from dividing 133 by 18 without subtracting the fixed £25 first (133 / 18 ≈ 7.4). The value 4.6 comes from pairing the numbers the wrong way round, working out (133 − 18) / 25 = 4.6. The value 90 comes from subtracting both 25 and 18 from 133 instead of dividing by 18.
- (d) 4x + 5 — A minus sign directly before a bracket changes the sign of both terms inside it: 6x − (2x − 5) = 6x − 2x + 5 = 4x + 5. The option 4x − 5 comes from only changing the sign of the 2x term and not the −5, giving 6x − 2x − 5. The option 8x − 5 comes from adding 2x instead of subtracting it, as if the minus sign did not apply to the bracket, giving 6x + 2x − 5. The option 8x + 5 repeats that same addition mistake and also changes the sign of the −5 term.
- (c) 5 — Method: gradient = change in y ÷ change in x between the two points. Working: change in y = 9 − 4 = 5, change in x = 1 − 0 = 1, so gradient = 5 ÷ 1 = 5. Answer: the gradient is 5. 13 comes from adding the y-values instead of subtracting them. 4 comes from using the y-value at x = 0 instead of the change in y between the two points. 1/5 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round.
- (b) 4 — Method: subtract the constant term from both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 4x = 24 − 8 = 16; x = 16 ÷ 4 = 4. Answer: x = 4. Priya's 6 comes from dividing 24 by 4 without first subtracting the 8, ignoring the constant term; substituting it back gives 4 × 6 + 8 = 32, not 24, which is why she is wrong. 16 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but forgetting to divide by 4. 12 comes from subtracting the coefficient 4 instead of dividing by it: 16 − 4 = 12. 8 comes from correctly finding 4x = 16 but then halving instead of dividing by 4.
- (d) 12 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 18 + 4(n − 1), set it equal to 62, and solve for n. Working: 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, so 4(n − 1) = 44, giving n − 1 = 11, so n = 12. Answer: row 12. 11 comes from using 18 + 4n = 62 instead of 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, an off-by-one error, giving n = 11. 48 comes from correctly simplifying to 4n = 48 but stopping there, without dividing by 4 to find n. 15.5 comes from dividing 62 by 4 directly, ignoring the 18 seats already in the front row.
- (a) 5.8 — The horizontal distance is 3 and the vertical distance is 5, so using Pythagoras' theorem the distance is √(3² + 5²) = √34 = 5.8 (1 d.p.). A candidate who adds the two differences instead of using Pythagoras gets 3 + 5 = 8.0. A candidate who works out 3² + 5² = 34 but forgets to take the square root gets 34.0. A candidate who subtracts the squares instead of adding them gets √(5² − 3²) = √16 = 4.0.
- (c) (x + 7)/4 — Method: dividing an expression by a number is written as a fraction, with the whole expression on top. Working: (x + 7) ÷ 4 = (x + 7)/4. Answer: (x + 7)/4. 4/(x + 7) comes from writing the numbers the wrong way round, putting 4 on top. 4(x + 7) comes from reading ÷ as ×, multiplying instead of dividing. (x + 7) − 4 comes from reading ÷ as −, subtracting instead of dividing.
- (d) 5n − 1 — The common difference is 5 (9−4=5), so the expression starts 5n. To match the first term when n=1, 5×1+c=4, so c=−1: the nth term is 5n−1. A candidate who uses the first term itself as the constant, instead of first term minus the common difference, would write 5n+4 (giving 9, 14, 19, 24 — one term too high throughout). A candidate who omits the constant term altogether would write just 5n (giving 5, 10, 15, 20, not matching the sequence). A candidate who adds the common difference to n instead of multiplying would write n+5 (giving 6, 7, 8, 9, far too small).
- (b) 27 — 27 = 3³ (3 × 3 × 3), so it is a cube number. The other three, 9 = 3², 16 = 4² and 25 = 5², are all square numbers, not cube numbers — each is reached by multiplying a whole number by itself only twice, not three times.
- (c) y = 9x + 3 — Method: in a linear cost model the charge that is paid once is the constant term and the charge made for each item is the coefficient of x. Working: each pizza costs £9, so x pizzas cost 9x pounds; the £3 delivery fee is paid once whatever the value of x, so it is added on as a constant and the total cost is y = 9x + 3. Answer: y = 9x + 3. The distractors: y = 3x + 9 comes from swapping the two charges over, treating the £3 delivery as a per-pizza cost and the £9 as the one-off charge; y = 9x leaves out the delivery fee altogether, which undercharges every order by £3; y = 12x comes from adding the delivery fee to the price of each pizza, £9 + £3 = £12 each, so the fee is charged once per pizza instead of once per order.
- (b) −1 — Method: in the form y = mx + c the gradient m is the number multiplying x, and an x term written with no number in front of it has a coefficient of 1. Working: y = −x + 3 is the same equation as y = (−1)x + 3, so comparing it with y = mx + c gives m = −1 and c = 3. Answer: −1. The distractors: 1 comes from taking the coefficient as 1 and leaving the minus sign out of the answer; 3 comes from reading the constant as the gradient, confusing m with c; −3 comes from moving the minus sign across to the constant term and then reading the gradient off that term instead of the x term.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.