Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 18 — Method: substitute the value, apply the index before the multiplication, and remember that a negative number multiplied by itself gives a positive result. Working: x² = (−3) × (−3) = 9, and then 2 × 9 = 18. Answer: 18. The distractors: −18 comes from squaring only the 3 and leaving the minus sign outside the index, giving 2 × (−9); 36 comes from multiplying 2 by −3 first and squaring afterwards, giving (−6)²; −12 comes from reading x² as 2x, so that the calculation becomes 2 × 2 × (−3).
- (a) −10 — Method: multiply each bracket out, treating the second bracket as being multiplied by −3 because it is subtracted, then collect like terms. Working: 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4 and −3(x + 2) = −3x − 6, so the expression becomes 8x − 4 − 3x − 6 − 5x; the x terms give 8x − 3x − 5x = 0, so no term in x survives, and the numbers give −4 − 6 = −10. Answer: −10. The distractors: 2 comes from expanding −3(x + 2) as −3x + 6, leaving the numbers −4 + 6; 5x − 10 comes from forgetting the final −5x, so the x terms give 8x − 3x = 5x; −7 comes from multiplying the 4 over only the first term of its bracket, giving 8x − 1 and so the numbers −1 − 6.
- (a) 6c — Each box has 6 chocolates, so c boxes have 6 × c = 6c chocolates. A candidate who adds the number of boxes to the number per box instead of multiplying gets 6 + c. A candidate who subtracts instead of multiplying gets c − 6. A candidate who divides instead of multiplying gets c ÷ 6.
- (d) 3 — Method: add the constant term to both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 3x = 4 + 5 = 9; x = 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: x = 3. −1/3 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 4 − 5 = −1, then x = −1/3. 6 comes from subtracting the coefficient 3 instead of dividing by it: 9 − 3 = 6. 9 comes from correctly finding 3x = 9 but forgetting to divide by 3.
- (b) 27 — 27 = 3³ (3 × 3 × 3), so it is a cube number. The other three, 9 = 3², 16 = 4² and 25 = 5², are all square numbers, not cube numbers — each is reached by multiplying a whole number by itself only twice, not three times.
- (a) 3 — Method: substitute the given value into the formula and carry out the subtraction in the order the formula is written. Working: replacing m with 8 gives L = 8 − 5, and 8 − 5 = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: 13 comes from adding 5 to 8 instead of subtracting it; 40 comes from reading m − 5 as a multiplication and working out 8 × 5; −3 comes from subtracting the wrong way round and working out 5 − 8.
- (b) y = 84 − 14x — Method: the distance still to go is the whole route minus the distance already covered, and at a steady speed the distance covered after x hours is the speed multiplied by x. Working: after x hours Freya has cycled 14x km, so the distance remaining is the 84 km route take away 14x, giving y = 84 − 14x, a straight line with intercept 84 and gradient −14. Answer: y = 84 − 14x. The distractors: y = 84 + 14x comes from adding the distance cycled to the length of the route rather than taking it away, so the ride would grow longer the further she goes; y = 14x − 84 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, which is negative for the whole of the ride; y = 14 − 84x comes from swapping the two numbers over, treating 84 km as the hourly speed and 14 km as the length of the route.
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (c) 5 — Method: let a be the number of adult tickets, so the number of child tickets is 9 − a. Form the equation 10a + 6(9 − a) = 74. Working: expand the bracket: 10a + 54 − 6a = 74, so 4a = 20, giving a = 5. Answer: 5 adult tickets. 4 comes from correctly finding the number of child tickets but reporting it instead of the number of adult tickets asked for. 1.25 comes from a sign error expanding the bracket, writing 10a + 54 + 6a = 74 instead of subtracting, which gives 16a = 20. 7.4 comes from dividing the total takings by the adult ticket price only, ignoring the children entirely, 74 ÷ 10.
- (d) x = 4 or x = −4 — Method: divide both sides by 2 to get x² = 16, then take the square root of both sides: x = 4 or x = −4. Distractor origins: x = 4 forgets the negative root; x = 8 comes from halving 16 instead of taking its square root; x = 16 stops at x² = 16 without ever taking the square root.
- (d) 128 — In 2p³ the index belongs to p only, so cube p first and multiply by the coefficient afterwards. Cubing gives 4 × 4 × 4 = 64, and then 2 × 64 = 128. Cubing the coefficient as well would mean working out (2 × 4)³, which is 512. Reading the index as an instruction to multiply by 3 gives 2 × 4 × 3 = 24, and ignoring the coefficient altogether leaves 64.
- (a) An identity, because it is true for every value of x — Expanding the brackets multiplies both terms inside by 4, giving 4x + 12, which is exactly the right-hand side. The two sides are therefore equal whatever x is, and a statement true for every value of the letter is an identity. An equation is true only for particular values, and trying to solve this one leads to 0 = 0, which places no restriction on x at all. Being able to expand brackets is not what makes a statement an identity, since any equation with brackets can be expanded. Nor is it a formula: a formula links two different quantities, and only one letter appears here.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (a) r = C / (2π) — Method: undo the multiplication by 2π by dividing both sides by 2π. Working: C = 2πr, so dividing both sides by 2π gives r = C / (2π). The value r = C / π comes from dividing by π only and forgetting the factor of 2 in 2π. The value r = 2πC comes from multiplying by 2π instead of dividing. The value r = C − 2π comes from subtracting 2π instead of dividing by it.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.