Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (c) 9 — Method: replace the letter with the value given for it, then work out the multiplication before the addition. Working: 5y means 5 × y, and 5 × 0 = 0, so the expression becomes 0 + 9, which is 9. Answer: 9. The distractors: 14 comes from treating 5 × 0 as 5, a common slip with zero, and then adding the 9; 0 comes from assuming that an expression containing a zero must itself be zero, so the + 9 is ignored; 45 comes from multiplying the whole expression by 5 instead of multiplying only y, giving 5 × (0 + 9).
- (a) 5 — The symbol ≤ means n can equal 5 or any number less than 5, so 5 is included and is the largest integer value. A candidate who treats the inequality as strict, as if it were n < 5, answers 4. A candidate who confuses ≤ with ≥ and looks for a value just above the boundary answers 6. A candidate who makes a sign error and reads the inequality as n ≤ −5 answers −5.
- (d) £40 — Method: add the two prices to make one expression in x, turn 'at least' into ≥, solve the inequality, then read the lowest possible price off the boundary of the solution set. Working: the two items cost x + (2x + 30) = 3x + 30 pounds, so 3x + 30 ≥ 150; subtracting 30 from both sides gives 3x ≥ 120; dividing both sides by 3 gives x ≥ 40, and the smallest value the shirt price is allowed to take is the boundary, £40. Answer: £40. The distractors: £50 comes from leaving the £30 out of the total and solving 3x ≥ 150; £60 comes from using the trousers expression on its own, 2x + 30 ≥ 150; £120 comes from stopping at 3x ≥ 120 and reading the 120 as the price of the shirt without dividing by 3.
- (a) 3x = 12 — Adding the two equations: the y-terms, +y and −y, have opposite signs, so they cancel; the x-terms combine to 2x + x = 3x; and the right-hand sides add to 11 + 1 = 12. This gives 3x = 12. A candidate who forgets that the y-terms cancel, and instead adds them as if they had the same sign, would write 3x + 2y = 12. A candidate who subtracts the right-hand sides instead of adding them would get 3x = 10. A candidate who correctly reaches 3x = 12 but then treats 12 itself as the value of x, skipping the final division, would write x = 12.
- (a) 14 — Substituting x = 3: y = 5(3) − 1 = 15 − 1 = 14. A candidate who stops after the multiplication and forgets to subtract 1 gets 15. A candidate who adds 1 instead of subtracting gets 16. A candidate who incorrectly treats the expression as 5 × (3 − 1) gets 10.
- (d) $y = x^2 - 2x - 3$ — Method: read the two x-intercepts (roots) from the graph, write the quadratic as the product of the corresponding factors, then expand. Working: the curve crosses the x-axis at x = −1 and x = 3, so the equation factorises as (x + 1)(x − 3), which expands to x² − 2x − 3. Answer: y = x² − 2x − 3. Distractor refutation: y = x² − x − 6 comes from misreading the left-hand crossing point as x = −2 instead of x = −1, giving factors (x + 2)(x − 3). y = x² − x − 2 comes from misreading the right-hand crossing point as x = 2 instead of x = 3, giving factors (x + 1)(x − 2). y = x² + 2x − 3 comes from writing the factors as (x − 1)(x + 3), swapping which root gets the plus sign and which gets the minus sign, giving the wrong sign on the x term.
- (c) y = 3x + 1 — Method: a line of known gradient m has equation y = mx + c, and c is found by substituting the coordinates of a point known to lie on it. Working: the gradient is 3, so the line is y = 3x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 4 gives 4 = 3 × 1 + c, so c = 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: y = 3x + 1. The distractors: y = 3x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 3 − 4 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = x + 3 comes from swapping the two numbers over, putting the gradient 3 in the constant position and the x-coordinate 1 in front of x; y = 3x + 4 comes from using the y-coordinate 4 as the constant without substituting.
- (d) 2.7 — The height after 3 years of 10% compound growth is 2 × 1.1³ = 2.662 m, which rounds to 2.7 m. A candidate who adds 10% of the original height (0.2 m) in each of the 3 years, instead of compounding on the new height each time, would reach 2 + 3×0.2 = 2.6 m. A candidate who compounds for only 2 years would reach 2 × 1.1² = 2.42 m, rounding to 2.4 m. A candidate who compounds for 4 years instead of 3 would reach 2 × 1.1⁴ = 2.928 m, rounding to 2.9 m.
- (c) 4x − 3 — Subtract each term inside the bracket: 5x − (x + 3) = 5x − x − 3 = 4x − 3. Writing 4x + 3 comes from subtracting the x but not the 3, keeping its sign positive. Writing 6x − 3 comes from adding the x term, 5x + x = 6x, instead of subtracting it. Writing 5x − 3 comes from ignoring the x term inside the bracket and only subtracting the 3.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (c) Second and fourth — If x + y = 0 then y = −x, so x and y always have opposite signs, one positive and one negative. A point with a negative x and a positive y lies in the second quadrant, and a point with a positive x and a negative y lies in the fourth quadrant, so the point lies in the second or the fourth. A candidate who reads x + y = 0 as meaning x and y have the same sign picks First and third, which is where x × y is positive, not where x + y = 0. A candidate who decides that y must be the positive coordinate picks the two quadrants above the x-axis, First and second. A candidate who decides that y must be the negative coordinate picks the two quadrants below the x-axis, Third and fourth.
- (c) 15 and 9 — Method: write the two facts as two equations in the same pair of letters and add them, because the letter with opposite signs cancels. Working: with x the larger number and y the smaller, x + y = 24 and x − y = 6; adding gives 2x = 30, so x = 15, and substituting into x + y = 24 gives y = 9. Answer: 15 and 9, which add to 24 and differ by 6. The distractors: 18 and 6 come from halving 24 to 12 and then adding and subtracting the whole difference of 6 instead of half of it, which leaves a difference of 12; 15 and 21 come from finding the larger number correctly and then adding 6 to it instead of subtracting; 15 and 6 come from finding the larger number and then taking the 6 in the question to be the smaller number itself.
- (a) 7 — Method: substitute the given value of x into the rule and carry out the operation written in it. Working: y = x + 4 with x = 3 gives y = 3 + 4, an addition of two whole numbers. Answer: y = 7. The distractors: 12 comes from multiplying by 4 instead of adding 4; 4 comes from writing down the number in the rule and never using the input at all; 1 comes from subtracting, 4 − 3, instead of adding.
- (a) 130 — Method: substitute the total bill into the formula, then subtract the fixed charge and divide by the cost per text message. Working: 24.50 = 18 + 0.05t, so 0.05t = 24.50 − 18 = 6.50, t = 6.50 ÷ 0.05 = 130. Answer: 130 extra text messages. 490 comes from dividing the whole bill by 0.05 without first subtracting the £18 fixed charge: 24.50 ÷ 0.05 = 490. 13 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.5 instead of 0.05, moving the decimal point one place too far: 6.50 ÷ 0.5 = 13. 65 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.1 instead of 0.05.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.