Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 52° — When two straight lines cross, the angles opposite each other at the crossing point are vertically opposite and are equal. Ray OQ is opposite ray OP and ray OS is opposite ray OR, so angle QOS is vertically opposite angle POR. Therefore angle QOS = 52°.
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (c) I is the same distance from all three sides. — The angle bisector from A is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and AC, and the angle bisector from B is the locus of points equidistant from sides AB and BC. Point I lies on both bisectors, so I is equidistant from AB and AC, and also equidistant from AB and BC — meaning I is the same distance from all three sides. (Being the same distance from all three vertices instead describes the circumcentre, found from the perpendicular bisectors of the sides, not the angle bisectors; I being the midpoint of AB confuses the angle bisector construction with the perpendicular bisector of a side; I lying on side AC is wrong because the angle bisectors meet inside the triangle, not on one of its sides.)
- (a) a rounded rectangle: 5 m by 4 m with semicircular ends — Points within 2 m of the straight part of the fence form a rectangle running the 5 m length of the fence and 4 m wide (2 m on each side); points within 2 m of each END of the fence, beyond that rectangle, form a semicircle of radius 2 m there, since the nearest point of the fence to them is just that one end. Together this gives a rounded, stadium-shaped region. "a rectangle, 9 m by 4 m" extends the rectangle by 2 m at each end instead of rounding it, wrongly including corner points that are actually more than 2 m from every part of the fence. "a circle of radius 2 m" treats the whole 5 m fence as a single point. "a rectangle, 5 m by 2 m" uses 2 m as the full width instead of the distance on EACH side, so it only covers one side of the fence.
- (d) 6 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 60° angle and the zip-wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 60° = 12 × 1/2 = 6 m. 6√3 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60°, which would give the vertical drop, not the horizontal distance. 4√3 m comes from treating 12 as the side adjacent to a tangent ratio and dividing by tan 60° = √3. 24 m comes from dividing 12 by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it.
- (b) The arcs only meet exactly on AB, not above or below it. — With a radius of exactly half of AB, the arc centred at A and the arc centred at B each reach precisely to the midpoint of AB, so they meet only at that one point, on the line AB itself — there are no two intersection points above and below the line to join, so the perpendicular bisector cannot be drawn. (The claim that this radius is always too short to draw any arc is wrong, since a radius equal to half of AB is a perfectly valid, positive length for a compass arc; the claim that the radius must equal the full length of AB is wrong — a longer radius than half of AB would also work, it does not have to equal AB exactly; the claim that the arcs would not cross line AB at all is wrong, since they do cross it — that is exactly the problem, they meet only on it.)
- (c) 117° — Co-interior (also called allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Angle PXY and angle XYS are co-interior angles, so angle PXY + angle XYS = 180°. 180° − 63° = 117°, so angle XYS = 117°. A student who mistakes co-interior angles for alternate angles, which are equal rather than supplementary, answers 63° instead. A student who treats the two angles as complementary, subtracting from 90° instead of 180°, gets 90° − 63° = 27°. A student who assumes the transversal meets the parallel lines at right angles answers 90°.
- (d) RHS, using AM as common side — Triangle ABM and triangle ACM both have a right angle at M, since AM is perpendicular to BC. AB and AC are the hypotenuses of the two triangles and are equal, and AM is a side common to both triangles, giving a right angle, equal hypotenuses and one further equal side, exactly RHS, so 'RHS, using AM as common side' is correct. 'SAS, right angle as included angle' wrongly treats the right angle at M as included between AB and AM, but AB is the hypotenuse, not one of the two sides forming that right angle. 'SSS, using BM = CM as a fact' wrongly assumes BM equals CM as a given fact, when this is only true because of the RHS congruence, not before it, so it cannot be used to prove that congruence. 'ASA, AB as the included side' again wrongly labels a side as if it could sit between two angles when only one angle, the right angle, is actually known.
- (a) Similar, but AAA alone does not prove congruence — Three equal corresponding angles (AAA) show that the two triangles are similar — the same shape — but says nothing about their size, so it does not prove congruence. They could be congruent, or one could simply be an enlargement of the other; without matching side lengths, congruence is not established, so 'congruent because AAA proves congruence' is wrong. Equal angles do not force equal sides — a triangle can be enlarged to any size while keeping the same angles, so that option is also wrong. Something CAN be said here — that the triangles are similar — so 'no relationship can be determined' is wrong too.
- (a) SSA - not sufficient to prove congruence — The angle given, angle A, is not the angle between sides AB and BC — it is not the included angle — so this data is SSA (side, side, angle), which is not sufficient to prove congruence on its own; two triangles can share this SSA information without being congruent. SAS is wrong because the given angle is not the one included between the two given sides. ASA is wrong because only one angle (A) is given, not two. AAS is wrong for the same reason — only one angle is given, not two.
- (c) 13 cm — Method: the two given sides meet at the right angle, so they are the shorter pair and the hypotenuse comes from Pythagoras' theorem, a² + b² = c². Working: c² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so c = √169 = 13. Answer: 13 cm. The distractors: 17 cm comes from adding the two sides, 5 + 12, rather than adding their squares; 60 cm comes from multiplying them, 5 × 12, which is twice the area of the triangle and not a length; 7 cm comes from subtracting, 12 − 5, as though the hypotenuse were the difference of the two shorter sides.
- (d) 8 — A cuboid is a 3D shape with 6 rectangular faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices (corners). Counting the corners of a cuboid gives 8. A candidate who mixes up vertices with faces answers 6. A candidate who mixes up vertices with edges answers 12. A candidate who counts only the 4 corners of the top face, forgetting the 4 corners of the bottom face, answers 4. The correct number of vertices is 8.
- (b) Square — A square has all four sides equal, all four angles equal to 90°, and diagonals that are equal in length and bisect each other at right angles — every part of the description matches, so Square is correct. A rhombus has all four sides equal and diagonals bisecting at right angles, but its interior angles are not generally 90° (only a square, a special rhombus, has that), so it does not fully match. A rectangle has four 90° angles and equal diagonals, but its sides are not all equal in general, so it fails the equal-sides condition. A kite has two pairs of adjacent equal sides rather than all four sides equal, and its diagonals are not generally equal in length, so it fails both conditions.
- (a) 2 — Method: recall that the diagonals of a rhombus are always lines of symmetry, whatever its angles are. Working: a rhombus (all sides equal) always has its two diagonals as lines of symmetry, giving 2 lines of symmetry, whether or not the angles are 90°. Options: 0 wrongly assumes a non-square rhombus has no symmetry at all; 4 comes from the number of lines of symmetry a square has, mistaking this rhombus for a square; 1 comes from treating the rhombus like a kite, which has only one diagonal as a line of symmetry. Answer: 2.
- (a) Two sides equal, with the angle between them equal — Method: recall what each letter in SAS stands for, and the order they must appear in. Working: SAS stands for Side, Angle, Side — two pairs of equal sides, with the equal angle positioned between them. Options: 'two sides and any one angle' describes SSA, which is not valid, since the angle must specifically be the included one; 'two angles with the side between them' describes ASA, a different condition; 'all three pairs of sides' describes SSS, also different. Answer: two sides equal, with the angle between them equal.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.