Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 75° — The three angles in the triangle formed by the two supports and the ground add up to 180°. Two of the angles are 34° and 71°, so the third angle is 180 − 34 − 71 = 75, which is 75°. 105° comes from adding the two given angles together instead of subtracting them from 180° (34 + 71 = 105). 146° comes from computing 180 − 34 = 146 and forgetting to also subtract 71°. 37° comes from subtracting the two given angles from each other instead of using the triangle's angle sum (71 − 34 = 37).
- (d) 125° — Method: two angles that sit next to each other at a crossing point lie on a straight line, so they add up to 180°; the angle that faces the given one across the point is the equal one, and that is not the angle asked for here. Working: 180° − 55° = 125°. Answer: 125°. The distractors: 55° is the angle vertically opposite the given one, taken by a candidate who reads “next to” as the facing angle and applies the equal-angles rule to the wrong pair; 35° comes from subtracting from 90°, treating the pair as complementary instead of as angles on a straight line; 90° comes from assuming that a line crossing a pair of parallel lines must meet them at right angles, which the question never says.
- (d) Base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal — DE = DF, so triangle DEF is isosceles with DE and DF as the two equal sides. The base angles opposite those equal sides, angle E and angle F, are therefore equal to each other. Angle F = 58°. A student who instead quotes 'Angles in a triangle sum to 180°' has picked a true fact about triangles, but that fact finds a missing angle from the other two — it does not explain why two angles are equal to each other. A student who quotes 'Angles on a straight line sum to 180°' has confused this with a straight-line angle fact, but no straight line of angles is described in this triangle.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (b) 25 minutes — Method: a rate in litres per minute can only be used on a volume measured in litres, so convert the tank first and then divide. Working: 1 m³ = 1000 litres, so the tank holds 0.45 × 1000 = 450 litres, and the time is 450 ÷ 18 = 25. Answer: 25 minutes. Using 1 m³ = 100 litres gives 45 ÷ 18 = 2.5 minutes. Using 1 m³ = 1 000 000 litres, which is the factor that turns cubic metres into cubic centimetres, gives 450 000 ÷ 18 = 25 000 minutes. Multiplying by the rate instead of dividing by it gives 450 × 18 = 8100.
- (a) A cuboid — Method: work out which solid has flat faces only, no curved surfaces and no point where edges meet, since only that gives rectangles for all three views. Working: a solid whose plan, front elevation and side elevation are all rectangles has three pairs of flat rectangular faces meeting at right angles — that is a cuboid. Answer: a cuboid. The distractors: a cylinder is wrong because its plan view (from above) is a circle, not a rectangle. A cone is wrong because its plan view is a circle and its front and side elevations are triangles. A square-based pyramid is wrong because its front and side elevations come to a point at the apex, giving triangles rather than rectangles, even though its plan view could be a square.
- (d) RHS — Both triangles have a right angle, their hypotenuses are equal, and one further pair of sides (AB and DE) are equal, exactly the RHS condition, so RHS is correct. SAS needs two sides and the angle between them; here the right angle at B is not between the hypotenuse and AB, so this is not a valid SAS setup, making SAS wrong. SSS needs three pairs of equal sides, but only two sides are given here, so SSS is wrong. ASA needs two angles and the side between them, but only one angle, the right angle, is given, so ASA is wrong.
- (a) a rounded rectangle: 5 m by 4 m with semicircular ends — Points within 2 m of the straight part of the fence form a rectangle running the 5 m length of the fence and 4 m wide (2 m on each side); points within 2 m of each END of the fence, beyond that rectangle, form a semicircle of radius 2 m there, since the nearest point of the fence to them is just that one end. Together this gives a rounded, stadium-shaped region. "a rectangle, 9 m by 4 m" extends the rectangle by 2 m at each end instead of rounding it, wrongly including corner points that are actually more than 2 m from every part of the fence. "a circle of radius 2 m" treats the whole 5 m fence as a single point. "a rectangle, 5 m by 2 m" uses 2 m as the full width instead of the distance on EACH side, so it only covers one side of the fence.
- (d) Equilateral — Method: triangles are named by their sides — three equal sides, exactly two equal sides, or no equal sides — or by their angles. Working: the triangle described has three equal sides, which is the equilateral case, and each of its angles is 60°. Answer: equilateral. The distractors: isosceles is the name for a triangle with exactly two equal sides, and is chosen by candidates who remember only that it is the 'equal sides' word; scalene is the name for a triangle whose sides are all different, so it is the opposite of what is described; right-angled classifies a triangle by an angle of 90° rather than by its sides, and is chosen by candidates who recall that the angles of this triangle are all equal and take 'equal angles' to mean 'right angles'.
- (b) A triangular prism standing on its triangular end — Method: a rectangular elevation with no sloping sides means the solid keeps the same cross-section all the way from the bottom to the top; work out which solid, standing the right way up, has a triangular cross-section that stays that shape as you go higher. Working: a triangular prism standing upright on its triangular end has a triangle as its plan view, and because the cross-section is constant all the way up, both the front and side elevations are plain rectangles. Answer: a triangular prism standing on its triangular end. The distractors: a triangle-based pyramid standing on its triangular base does give a triangle as its plan view, but its cross-section shrinks towards the apex, so its front and side elevations come to a point and are triangles, not rectangles. A cuboid standing on a rectangular face is wrong because its plan view is a rectangle, not a triangle. A triangular prism lying on one of its rectangular faces is wrong because it is then the triangular end that faces the side, so its plan view is a rectangle and one of its elevations is a triangle.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (b) (5, −2) — Reflecting in the x-axis keeps the x-coordinate the same and changes the sign of the y-coordinate, so (5, 2) → (5, −2). ((−5, 2) comes from reflecting in the y-axis instead, changing the sign of the x-coordinate; (−5, −2) comes from changing the sign of both coordinates, as for a reflection in the origin; (2, 5) comes from swapping the coordinates, which is what happens for a reflection in the line y = x.)
- (c) 2 hours 15 minutes — Divide the total minutes by 60: 135 ÷ 60 = 2 remainder 15, so that is 2 hours 15 minutes. Treating 100 minutes as one hour, a metric-style mistake, gives 135 − 100 = 35, so 1 hour 35 minutes. Subtracting 60 twice to reach the 15 minutes left over, but losing count and recording only one of the two hours removed, gives 1 hour 15 minutes. Writing 135 ÷ 60 = 2.25 and then reading the '25' as minutes, instead of converting the 0.25 of an hour into 15 minutes, gives 2 hours 25 minutes.
- (a) 2.40m — Method: a cost found from a rate is the rate multiplied by the amount bought. Working: the rate is £2.40 per kilogram and the amount is m kilograms, so the cost is 2.40 × m. Answer: 2.40m. A candidate who divides the amount by the rate instead of multiplying writes m/2.40. A candidate who adds the rate to the amount instead of multiplying writes 2.40 + m. A candidate who subtracts the rate from the amount instead of multiplying writes m − 2.40.
- (b) 16.747 m³ — Volume of a sphere = (4/3)πr³, so a hemisphere is half that: (2/3)πr³. Substitute r = 2: (2/3) × 3.14 × 2³ = (2/3) × 3.14 × 8 = (2/3) × 25.12 = 16.7467 m³, which rounds to 16.747 m³.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.