Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 9 — AB is a vertical segment, since A and B share the x-coordinate 1, and its length is the difference in y-coordinates: 5 − 1 = 4. BC is a horizontal segment, since B and C share the y-coordinate 5, and its length is the difference in x-coordinates: 6 − 1 = 5. The total path length is 4 + 5 = 9. 20 comes from multiplying the two lengths, 4 × 5, instead of adding them. 5 is only the length of BC, forgetting to include AB. 4 is only the length of AB, forgetting to include BC.
- (c) exterior angle = sum of the two interior opposite angles — Angle ACD is the exterior angle at C, and the exterior angle of a triangle is always equal to the sum of the two interior angles at the other two vertices — here, angle BAC and angle ABC — so angle ACD = 48° + 67° = 115°. "angles in a triangle add up to 180°" is a true fact, but on its own it only gives the INTERIOR angle at C (180 − 48 − 67 = 65°), not the exterior angle 115° — reaching 115° that way still needs a further step. "angles on a straight line add up to 180°" is the fact that links the interior and exterior angles at C to each other, not the fact that gives 115° directly from the two OTHER angles. "exterior angle is always double the smallest angle" is not a genuine angle fact: double the smallest angle here is 48° × 2 = 96°, not 115°.
- (b) Acute — An acute angle is any angle less than 90°. Since 47° is less than 90°, it is acute. An obtuse angle is between 90° and 180°, which 47° is not. A reflex angle is greater than 180°, which is far too big for 47°. A right angle is exactly 90°, not 47°. The angle is acute.
- (b) 360 cm² — Method: the total surface area is the square base plus the four triangular faces, and the height used for a triangular face is the slant height of 13 cm, not the vertical height of 12 cm. Working: the base is 10 × 10 = 100 cm²; one triangular face is (10 × 13) ÷ 2 = 65 cm², so four faces give 4 × 65 = 260 cm²; the total is 100 + 260 = 360. Answer: 360 cm². The distractors: 260 cm² comes from adding the four triangular faces and leaving out the base; 340 cm² comes from using the vertical height of 12 cm as the height of each triangle, 100 + 4 × 60; 620 cm² comes from working out each face as 10 × 13 without halving, 100 + 4 × 130.
- (d) All angles equal and all sides equal — Congruent triangles are identical in both shape and size, so every corresponding angle is equal and every corresponding side is equal, so 'all angles equal and all sides equal' is correct. 'All angles equal, sides may differ' describes 'similar' triangles, which have equal angles but sides in the same ratio rather than necessarily equal, not congruent ones. 'All sides equal, angles may differ' is not geometrically possible for triangles, since equal sides throughout force the angles to match too. 'Same area, angles and sides may differ' is wrong because equal area alone does not guarantee congruence; two triangles can share an area with completely different shapes.
- (a) 100° — In a kite, the pair of angles between the unequal sides are equal to each other. Angle X and angle Z are both between one side from the WX/WZ pair and one side from the XY/ZY pair, so angle Z = angle X = 100°.
- (a) 118° — When two straight lines cross, the angles that are vertically opposite each other are always equal. So the angle vertically opposite 118° is also 118°. A candidate who instead finds the angle next to it on the straight line, using 180° − 118° = 62°, has found the adjacent angle, not the vertically opposite one. A candidate who answers 180° has confused the rule with angles on a straight line. A candidate who doubles the angle, giving 236°, has applied no valid angle rule at all. The vertically opposite angle is 118°.
- (c) They must also be equal — Once two triangles are proved congruent by any condition, including ASA, they are identical in every respect: every pair of corresponding sides and every pair of corresponding angles must be equal, not just the ones originally used to prove the congruence. So the two remaining pairs of corresponding sides must also be equal, making 'they must also be equal' correct. 'They might be equal or not' and 'not enough information to say' both wrongly suggest that congruence only guarantees the specific facts used to prove it, when congruence actually guarantees the triangles are identical overall. 'They must be different' is backwards: the triangles being identical is the entire point of proving congruence, not a reason for a side to differ.
- (a) isosceles trapezium — One pair of parallel sides, plus a separate pair of equal non-parallel sides, is exactly the definition of an isosceles trapezium — the shape the designer should draw. Parallelogram is wrong because a parallelogram needs BOTH pairs of opposite sides parallel, but only one pair is parallel here. Kite is wrong because a kite has two separate pairs of adjacent equal sides and no requirement for any sides to be parallel, a different combination of properties. Rhombus is wrong because a rhombus needs all four sides equal, but the description only makes two of the four sides equal to each other.
- (c) 1 — sin 30° = 1/2 and cos 60° = 1/2, so sin 30° + cos 60° = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. 0 comes from subtracting the two values instead of adding them (1/2 − 1/2). 1/2 comes from writing down only one of the two exact values and forgetting to add the other. √3 comes from swapping the two angles and working out sin 60° + cos 30° = √3/2 + √3/2 = √3.
- (b) a rectangle — Lying on its side, the cylinder's curved surface touches the table along a straight line, and the two flat circular ends face sideways rather than up or down; viewed from directly above, the outline traced is a rectangle — as long as the cylinder and as wide as its diameter. "a circle" would be correct if the cylinder stood upright on one of its circular ends instead of lying on its side. "a triangle" belongs to a cone lying or standing so that it narrows to a point in that view, which a cylinder never does. "an oval" is a common guess from picturing the round ends, but from directly above those ends are edge-on and contribute to the rectangle's short sides, not a curved outline.
- (b) 320.3 cm³ — Cylinder volume = πr²h = 3.14 × 3² × 10 = 3.14 × 9 × 10 = 282.6 cm³. Cone volume = (1/3)πr²h = (1/3) × 3.14 × 9 × 4 = (1/3) × 113.04 = 37.68 cm³. Total = 282.6 + 37.68 = 320.28 cm³, which rounds to 320.3 cm³.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (b) trapezium — A quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides is a trapezium; field ABCD has AB parallel to DC and no other pair of parallel sides, so trapezium is correct. Parallelogram requires BOTH pairs of opposite sides to be parallel, but the plan says only AB and DC are parallel. Rhombus requires all four sides to be equal in length, which is not stated here. A kite is defined by two pairs of adjacent equal sides, not by having a pair of parallel sides, so it does not match this description either.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.