Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (c) It is a parallelogram but not a rectangle — Method: match the given properties to the definition of each named quadrilateral. Working: having both pairs of opposite sides parallel and equal in length is exactly the definition of a parallelogram; since none of the angles are right angles, it cannot also be a rectangle, which needs four right angles. Options: 'must be a rectangle' wrongly assumes every parallelogram has right angles; 'must be a rhombus' wrongly assumes equal opposite sides means all four sides are equal, but only the opposite pairs are stated as equal here; 'trapezium' is wrong because a trapezium has exactly one pair of parallel sides, while this shape has two pairs, so it is a parallelogram and not a trapezium. Answer: it is a parallelogram but not a rectangle.
- (d) 4.44 m — The real van's length is 18.5 × 24 = 444 cm, which converts to 4.44 m. '0.77 m' comes from dividing by 24 instead of multiplying, using the ratio the wrong way round (18.5 ÷ 24 = 0.77 cm), and then writing that figure down as metres. '44.4 m' comes from converting 444 cm to metres with the decimal point in the wrong place. '444 m' comes from working out 444 cm correctly but forgetting to convert it into metres at all.
- (a) 6 — A cuboid has six faces in total: a top, a bottom, a front, a back, and two ends — each one is a rectangle in the net, giving six rectangles altogether. Choosing 3 counts only the three PAIRS of congruent rectangles (top/bottom, front/back, two ends) rather than all six individual faces. Choosing 5 forgets one face, as if the net were missing its lid. Choosing 12 is the number of edges of a cuboid, not the number of rectangles in its net.
- (c) (−2, 10) — To translate M(3, 8) by $\binom{−5}{2}$, add −5 to the x-coordinate and 2 to the y-coordinate: (3 + (−5), 8 + 2) = (−2, 10). (5, 3) comes from swapping the two components of the vector before applying them. (−2, 8) applies only the x-component and forgets to add the y-component. (3, 10) applies only the y-component and forgets to add the x-component.
- (d) SAS — two sides, included angle — Each section has two known sides, 3.6 m and 2.4 m, with the 70° angle between them, matching in both sections; this is exactly the SAS condition, so 'SAS — two sides, included angle' is correct. 'SSS — but only two sides given' is wrong because SSS requires three pairs of equal sides, but only two sides are given for each triangle here. 'ASA — angle between two sides' is wrong because ASA requires two angles with a side between them, but only one angle, 70°, is given, not two. 'Cannot prove — only one angle' is wrong because SAS is specifically designed to prove congruence from exactly two sides and the one angle between them, so no further angle is needed.
- (b) AB = DE — RHS needs a right angle, the hypotenuse, and one OTHER side to be equal; the right angles and hypotenuses are already equal, so a matching pair of the remaining sides, AB = DE, completes RHS. Angle A = angle D is an extra ANGLE fact, not the extra SIDE fact that RHS specifically requires. AC being parallel to DF says nothing about either triangle's side lengths, so it cannot complete a congruence condition. Being drawn the same way up is about orientation on the page, not about any measurement, so it proves nothing about congruence.
- (a) the lens-shaped region where the two circles overlap — The region within 30 km of the ship is a circle of radius 30 km around the ship; the region within 20 km of the lighthouse is a circle of radius 20 km around the lighthouse. Since 30 + 20 = 50 km is more than the 40 km between them, and 30 − 20 = 10 km is less than 40 km, the two circles genuinely overlap, in a lens-shaped region where both conditions hold at once. "the whole smaller circle, since it fits inside the larger one" would only be true if the 40 km distance between the centres were small enough for one circle to swallow the other, which it is not here. "no overlap — 30 km and 20 km don't add to 40 km" wrongly assumes the two radii must add up to exactly the distance between the centres for an overlap to exist; any total greater than that distance is enough. "a straight strip, exactly halfway between the two" confuses this with an equidistant locus, which is a different problem from the one asked here.
- (a) Isosceles trapezium: base angles are equal — WX is parallel to ZY and the two non-parallel sides WZ and XY are equal in length, so WXYZ is an isosceles trapezium. In an isosceles trapezium the two angles at each of the parallel sides are equal, so angle W = angle X (and angle Z = angle Y). A student who answers with the parallelogram property has quoted a fact that is true of a parallelogram, but WZ and XY are given as non-parallel so WXYZ is not a parallelogram — and in a parallelogram "opposite angles" pairs W with Y, not W with X. A student who answers with the kite property has again taken a true fact about the wrong shape: a kite's equal sides are two pairs of adjacent sides, not the two non-parallel sides of a trapezium. A student who answers with the rhombus property has used something no rhombus has — a rhombus has two pairs of parallel sides and only two pairs of equal angles; all four angles are equal only in a square.
- (a) 3.75 km — To convert metres to kilometres, divide by 1000: 3750 ÷ 1000 = 3.75 km. Dividing by 100 instead of 1000 gives 37.5 km. Dividing by 10 instead of 1000 gives 375 km. Dividing by 10 000 instead of 1000 gives 0.375 km.
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
- (a) $\binom{1}{6.5}$ — After the first flight, the drone is at (3.5 − 6.2, −2 + 4.5) = (−2.7, 2.5). The second vector takes it from (−2.7, 2.5) to (−1.7, 9): subtract the coordinates, (−1.7 − (−2.7), 9 − 2.5) = (1, 6.5). The distractor $\binom{−4.4}{6.5}$ comes from treating the drone's position after the first flight as (2.7, 2.5) instead of (−2.7, 2.5), giving −1.7 − 2.7 = −4.4 for the top number. The distractor $\binom{−5.2}{11}$ comes from finding the vector straight from the start point (3.5, −2) to (−1.7, 9), ignoring the first flight altogether. The distractor $\binom{−1}{−6.5}$ comes from subtracting the wrong way round, (−2.7 − (−1.7), 2.5 − 9), which reverses both signs of the correct vector.
- (b) 12 cm — Method: in similar shapes every length is multiplied by the same scale factor, and a ratio of 1 : 3 means that factor is 3 going from the smaller shape to the larger one. Working: 4 × 3 = 12. Answer: 12 cm. The distractors: 7 cm comes from adding 3 to the side instead of multiplying by it, which is what happens when a ratio is read as a difference; 36 cm comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, the factor that scales areas, and applying it to a length; 4 cm comes from treating the two shapes as congruent, so that corresponding sides stay equal — similar shapes have equal angles, but their sides are in proportion.
- (a) 5 — Method: add the two triangular end faces to the three rectangular side faces. Working: 2 triangular faces + 3 rectangular faces = 5 faces in total. A student who answers 6 has confused this with a cuboid's face count. A student who answers 9 has counted the edges instead of the faces. A student who answers 3 has only counted the rectangular faces and forgotten the two triangular ends. Answer: 5 faces.
- (a) opposite angles of a parallelogram are equal — P and R are opposite vertices of the parallelogram, and opposite angles of a parallelogram are always equal, which is why angle R equals angle P, 65°. Co-interior angles adding up to 180° is the correct fact for angle Q or angle S, the angles adjacent to P along a side, not for the opposite angle R. Alternate angles are equal is a fact about a transversal crossing two parallel lines, which explains other angle relationships in the parallelogram, not the one between opposite angles P and R directly. Angles on a straight line adding up to 180° applies to two angles that sit together on one straight line, which P and R do not.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.