Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Foundation tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Foundation
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 1 — At 45° the right-angled isosceles triangle has both shorter sides equal, so tan 45° = opposite ÷ adjacent = 1 ÷ 1 = 1. 0 is the value of tan 0° (mixing up the two angles). √3 is the value of tan 60°. √3/3 (equivalent to 1/√3) is the value of tan 30°.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
- (b) Wrong: 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 3.2 l = 3200 ml. — 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 3.2 litres = 3.2 × 1000 = 3200 ml — Sam is wrong because he multiplied by 100 instead of 1000. Saying Sam is correct accepts the wrong multiplier. Saying Sam is wrong only because 3.2 should be rounded first misses the real error, which is the multiplier, not the starting number. Saying '1 litre is 100 ml' misstates the basic fact and blames the wrong part of Sam's working.
- (a) A smaller circle — Since the cutting plane is parallel to the circular base, the cross-section is also a circle, but smaller than the base because the cone narrows as it rises towards the apex, so 'a smaller circle' is correct. 'A triangle' wrongly describes the outline seen from the side of the cone, not a horizontal cross-section. 'An ellipse' would only result from a cut made at an angle to the base, not one parallel to it. 'The same size circle as the base' wrongly ignores that the cone tapers, so any parallel cross-section above the base must be smaller.
- (c) 5 cm — Diameter = circumference ÷ π, so 31.4 ÷ 3.14 = 10 cm, and the radius is half the diameter, so 10 ÷ 2 = 5 cm. 10 cm is the diameter itself, given as the radius by forgetting the final halving step. 15.7 cm comes from halving the circumference, 31.4 ÷ 2 = 15.7, and stopping there, treating half the circumference as the radius without ever dividing by π. 2.5 cm comes from halving the correct radius again, effectively dividing by 2 twice instead of once.
- (b) A right-angled triangle — The right angle at Y makes this a right-angled triangle, so that description is correct. Since XY is twice YZ, those two sides cannot be equal. The third side XZ is opposite the right angle, so it is the hypotenuse and is longer than either XY or YZ, so it cannot equal either of them. No two sides are equal, which rules out 'an isosceles triangle' and 'a right-angled isosceles triangle', both of which wrongly assume two equal sides. 'An equilateral triangle' would need all three sides equal, which contradicts XY being twice YZ, so it is wrong too.
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
- (c) 11.0 cm — Arc length = (angle ÷ 360) × 2 × π × r = (90 ÷ 360) × 2 × 3.14 × 7 = 0.25 × 43.96 = 10.99 cm, which rounds to 11.0 cm. (44.0 cm comes from finding the full circumference, 2 × 3.14 × 7 = 43.96 cm, and forgetting the angle fraction; 5.5 cm comes from leaving out the factor of 2, using π × r instead of 2 × π × r, giving 0.25 × 3.14 × 7 = 5.495 cm; 22.0 cm comes from using the diameter, 14 cm, in place of the radius, giving 0.25 × 2 × 3.14 × 14 = 21.98 cm.)
- (d) 2π cm — Arc length is the fraction θ/360 of the full circumference, 2πr. Substitute θ = 60 and r = 6: 60 out of 360 is one sixth, and the full circumference is 2π × 6 = 12π. One sixth of 12π is 2π, so the arc length is 2π cm. Choosing 12π cm uses the full circumference without scaling it down by the fraction θ/360 first. Choosing 6π cm applies the SECTOR AREA formula, (θ/360) × πr², instead of the arc length formula — that calculation actually gives 6π, which is the area in cm², not a length. Choosing π cm uses πr instead of 2πr, missing the factor of 2 in the circumference formula.
- (c) 56.52 cm² — Sector area = (45 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 12² = 0.125 × 3.14 × 144 = 56.52 cm². (4.71 cm² comes from forgetting to square the radius; 452.16 cm² comes from finding the area of the whole circle and forgetting the angle fraction; 9.42 cm² comes from using the arc length formula instead of the sector area formula.)
- (a) 6 cm — Method: a rectangle is made of two lengths and two widths, so the perimeter is 2 × (length + width). Half the perimeter is therefore one length plus one width, and the width is what is left of that half once the length is taken away. Working: 30 ÷ 2 = 15 cm is one length added to one width, and 15 − 9 = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 21 cm comes from taking the length off the whole perimeter, 30 − 9, so three sides are still counted in the figure that is written down; 12 cm comes from removing both lengths correctly, 30 − 2 × 9 = 12, and then recording that remainder as the width instead of halving it, because it is in fact the two widths together; 7.5 cm comes from dividing the perimeter by four, 30 ÷ 4, which is the calculation for the side of a square and throws away the length that was given.
- (c) 6 cm — For a parallelogram, area = base × height, so height = area ÷ base = 54 ÷ 9 = 6 cm. 12 cm comes from using the triangle's reverse formula, height = 2 × area ÷ base, which does not apply to a parallelogram. 45 cm comes from subtracting the base from the area, 54 − 9, instead of dividing. 486 cm comes from multiplying the area by the base, 54 × 9, instead of dividing.
- (c) 9 cm — The scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is PQ ÷ AB = 12 ÷ 8 = 1.5. So PR = AC × 1.5 = 6 × 1.5 = 9 cm. (4 cm comes from using the scale factor upside down, AB ÷ PQ; 10 cm comes from adding the difference between AB and PQ, 4 cm, to AC instead of scaling; 16 cm comes from multiplying PQ by the ratio AB : AC instead of scaling AC by the correct scale factor.)
- (b) Square — A square has all four sides equal, all four angles equal to 90°, and diagonals that are equal in length and bisect each other at right angles — every part of the description matches, so Square is correct. A rhombus has all four sides equal and diagonals bisecting at right angles, but its interior angles are not generally 90° (only a square, a special rhombus, has that), so it does not fully match. A rectangle has four 90° angles and equal diagonals, but its sides are not all equal in general, so it fails the equal-sides condition. A kite has two pairs of adjacent equal sides rather than all four sides equal, and its diagonals are not generally equal in length, so it fails both conditions.
- (a) 60° — Method: the three angles of a triangle add up to 180°, so add the two known angles and subtract the total from 180°. Working: 50 + 70 = 120, then 180 − 120 = 60. Answer: 60°. The distractors: 120° is the sum of the two known angles, given as the answer instead of being subtracted from 180°; 110° comes from subtracting only the 70° angle from 180° and forgetting the 50° one; 240° comes from subtracting the sum from 360°, using the angles at a point rather than the angle sum of a triangle.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.