Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16

Proportion as equality of ratios worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Fifteen questions on "proportion as equality of ratios" — DfE statement R7. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

Non-calculator

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: Proportion as equality of ratios worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Maths · GCSE Foundation · R7 · Proportion as equality of ratios · Non-calculator · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(c) 16% — Method: scale each concentration to its own mass to find the salt it contains, add the two masses of salt, then write the ratio of salt to mixture per 100 g. Working: 10:100 = x:300 gives 30 g of salt, and 25:100 = y:200 gives 50 g of salt; the mixture holds 30 + 50 = 80 g of salt in 300 + 200 = 500 g of solution; 80:500 = 16:100. Answer: 16%. The distractors: 17.5% is the mean of 10% and 25%, which ignores that there is more of the weaker solution than of the stronger one; 19% comes from swapping the two concentrations over, working out (300 × 25% + 200 × 10%) ÷ 500; 26.7% comes from dividing the 80 g of salt by the 300 g of the first solution rather than by the 500 g of mixture.
(d) Yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6 — Method: two ratios are equal when their cross-products are equal, so multiply the first part of each ratio by the second part of the other. Working: 4 × 9 = 36 and 6 × 6 = 36; the two products match, so the ratios are equal, and simplifying both to 2:3 shows the same thing. Answer: yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6. The distractors: the reason that the number 6 appears in both ratios reaches the right verdict from a surface match, since a figure shared by two ratios says nothing about equivalence — 4:6 and 6:5 share a 6 and are not equal; the reason built on 9 − 6 and 6 − 4 compares the differences inside each ratio, 3 against 2, which is additive thinking and ends at a verdict of no; the reason built on 4 × 6 and 6 × 9 multiplies the two parts of each ratio together instead of across the pair, giving 24 against 54 and again a verdict of no.
(c) 30 — Method: use y = kx and find k from the given pair of values, then substitute x = 12. Working: k = 20 ÷ 8 = 2.5, so y = 2.5 × 12 = 30. Answer: 30. 24 comes from treating the relationship as additive, adding the increase in x (12 − 8 = 4) straight onto y (20 + 4 = 24), instead of multiplying by k. 14.5 comes from finding k correctly (2.5) but then adding it to x instead of multiplying (12 + 2.5 = 14.5). 4.8 comes from finding k upside down, 8 ÷ 20 = 0.4, and multiplying by x: 12 × 0.4 = 4.8.
(a) Yes — dividing both parts of 6 : 15 by 3 gives 2 : 5 — Method: divide both parts of the ratio by their highest common factor and compare. Working: the highest common factor of 6 and 15 is 3. 6 ÷ 3 = 2 and 15 ÷ 3 = 5, giving 2 : 5, so Ollie is correct. Wrong options: '6 : 15 simplifies to 3 : 5' divides incorrectly, giving the wrong simplified ratio; 'cannot simplify a ratio that does not start with an even number' states a false rule — any ratio can be simplified if its parts share a common factor; '15 ÷ 6 is not a whole number, so it cannot be simplified' wrongly tries to divide one part by the other instead of finding a common factor.
(d) £24 — Add the parts of the ratio: 2 + 3 + 7 = 12. Find the value of one part: £96 ÷ 12 = £8. Cara's share is 3 parts: 3 × £8 = £24. (£16 is Ben's share, 2 × £8, not Cara's. £56 is Dev's share, 7 × £8, not Cara's. £28.80 comes from wrongly adding the ratio parts as 10 instead of 12, giving one part = £9.60.)
(c) £21 — Method: the two amounts are in the same ratio as 5:3, so write 5:3 = 35:x, find the value of one part and then take the number of parts asked for. Working: Harry's £35 is 5 parts, so one part is £35 ÷ 5 = £7; Isla has 3 parts, so 3 × £7 = £21. Answer: £21. The distractors: £7 is the value of a single part, given as Isla's share instead of being multiplied by the 3 parts she has; £28 comes from finding one part correctly and then working out £35 − £7, subtracting one part from Harry's money instead of taking three parts; £33 comes from treating the ratio additively — the parts differ by 5 − 3 = 2, so £2 is taken off Harry's £35, but a ratio compares by multiplying, not by subtracting.
(c) Yes — 700 ÷ 7 = 100 ml for the 1 part of concentrate — Method: add the ratio parts to find the total number of parts, divide the total volume by this, then use the ratio to find concentrate's share. Working: 1 + 6 = 7 parts. 700 ÷ 7 = 100 ml per part. Concentrate = 1 part = 100 ml, so Freya is correct. Wrong options: 'divide 700 by 6' uses only one of the ratio numbers instead of the total of 7 parts, giving about 117 ml; '600 ml is concentrate' swaps which ratio number belongs to the concentrate and which belongs to the water; 'half of 700 ml should be concentrate' ignores the ratio altogether and assumes an equal split.
(c) 9% — Method: a percentage concentration is the ratio of salt to solution written per 100 g, so scale each concentration to the mass it belongs to, add the two masses of salt, then scale the ratio of salt to mixture back to a denominator of 100. Working: 5:100 = x:400 gives 5 ÷ 100 × 400 = 20 g of salt, and 25:100 = y:100 gives 25 g of salt; the mixture holds 20 + 25 = 45 g of salt in 400 + 100 = 500 g of solution; 45:500 = 9:100. Answer: 9%. The distractors: 15% is the mean of 5% and 25%, which would only be right if the two masses were equal, and here one is four times the other; 21% comes from attaching the concentrations to the wrong masses, working out (400 × 25% + 100 × 5%) ÷ 500; 0.9% comes from working out 45 ÷ 500 = 0.09 and then moving the decimal point one place instead of two when writing the decimal as a percentage.
(d) 450 g — Find the amount of rice per person: 300 ÷ 4 = 75 g. Multiply by the new number of people: 75 × 6 = 450 g. Giving 200 g swaps which number the rice is divided and multiplied by (300 ÷ 6 × 4 = 200), scaling the wrong way. Giving 180 g uses 4 + 6 = 10 as the base instead of the original 4 people (300 × 6 ÷ 10 = 180). Giving 400 g assumes each of the 2 extra people needs 300 ÷ 6 = 50 g on top of the original 300 g (300 + 2 × 50 = 400), rather than scaling the whole amount in proportion.
(a) 135 km — Method: find the distance travelled on one litre, then scale up to 9 litres. Working: 90 ÷ 6 = 15 km per litre, so 15 × 9 = 135 km. Answer: 135 km. 45 km comes from working out the extra distance for the extra 3 litres (15 × 3) but forgetting to add the original 90 km. 60 km comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 6 ÷ 9, instead of finding the rate per litre first. 99 km comes from simply adding the number of litres, 9, onto the original distance, 90, instead of scaling the whole journey.
(d) 75 pages — Method: find the number of pages printed in one minute, then scale up to 10 minutes. Working: 45 ÷ 6 = 7.5 pages per minute, so 7.5 × 10 = 75 pages. Answer: 75 pages. 27 pages comes from using the ratio upside down, 45 × 6 ÷ 10, instead of finding the rate per minute first. 55 pages comes from simply adding the extra minutes, 10, onto the original number of pages, 45. 70 pages comes from rounding the rate down to 7 pages per minute before multiplying by 10, instead of using the exact rate of 7.5.
(a) 375 g — Find the amount of flour needed per muffin: 150 ÷ 6 = 25 g. Multiply by the new number of muffins: 25 × 15 = 375 g. (60 g comes from using the scale factor the wrong way round, 6/15 × 150. 150 g comes from not scaling the recipe at all. 300 g comes from rounding the scale factor, 15 ÷ 6, down to 2 before multiplying.)
(c) 5 hours — Method: measure the job in decorator-hours, which is in the same ratio as the number of rooms, then share the decorator-hours between the decorators available. Working: 5 decorators × 6 hours = 30 decorator-hours for 3 rooms, so one room takes 30 ÷ 3 = 10 decorator-hours; 5 rooms take 5 × 10 = 50 decorator-hours; shared between 10 decorators that is 50 ÷ 10 = 5 hours. Answer: 5 hours. The distractors: 3 hours comes from halving the 6 hours because the number of decorators doubles, while forgetting that there are also more rooms to paint; 10 hours comes from scaling the 6 hours up for the rooms only, 6 × 5 ÷ 3, and leaving the workforce at 5 decorators; 6 hours comes from assuming that doubling the decorators and increasing the rooms cancel each other out, which they do not, because the rooms rise by a factor of 5/3 and the workforce by a factor of 2.
(d) 24 — Method: split 60 into 3 + 7 = 10 equal parts, find the value of one part, then use the difference in ratio parts. Working: 60 ÷ 10 = 6, so the numbers are 3 × 6 = 18 and 7 × 6 = 42, and their difference is 42 − 18 = 24. Answer: 24. 4 comes from finding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 3, but forgetting to multiply by the value of one part. 60 comes from adding the two numbers back together instead of subtracting, which just repeats the given sum. 80 comes from dividing 60 by the first ratio number, 3, instead of by the total number of parts, 10, giving a part value of 20 and a difference of 7 × 20 − 3 × 20 = 80.
(d) 132 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio, use it to find Leo's pages, then add both amounts together. Working: 84 ÷ 7 = 12 (value of one part). Leo's pages = 12 × 4 = 48. Total = 84 + 48 = 132. Wrong options: 48 gives only Leo's pages and forgets to add Mia's; 147 comes from reversing the ratio parts (84 ÷ 4 × 7 = 147) and stopping there; 231 comes from reversing the ratio parts and then adding Mia's pages (84 + 147).

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.