Printable · GCSE Foundation · ages 14-16

Proportion as equality of ratios worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Fifteen questions on "proportion as equality of ratios" — DfE statement R7. Print it, or print three versions so neighbours cannot copy by letter; the key gives the letter for each version.

Non-calculator

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

CalculatorMixed Non-calculator (Paper 1)Calculator (Papers 2 and 3)

New sheet

Answer key: Proportion as equality of ratios worksheet — GCSE Foundation

Maths · GCSE Foundation · R7 · Proportion as equality of ratios · Non-calculator · 15 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(d) 75 pages — Method: find the number of pages printed in one minute, then scale up to 10 minutes. Working: 45 ÷ 6 = 7.5 pages per minute, so 7.5 × 10 = 75 pages. Answer: 75 pages. 27 pages comes from using the ratio upside down, 45 × 6 ÷ 10, instead of finding the rate per minute first. 55 pages comes from simply adding the extra minutes, 10, onto the original number of pages, 45. 70 pages comes from rounding the rate down to 7 pages per minute before multiplying by 10, instead of using the exact rate of 7.5.
(a) 0.6 litres — The ratio 1 : 9 means the solution has 1 + 9 = 10 equal parts in total. Each part is 6 ÷ 10 = 0.6 litres, and disinfectant is 1 part, so Priti needs 0.6 litres of disinfectant. Giving 0.667 litres divides by 9, the number of parts of water, instead of the total number of parts, 10 (6 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.667). Giving 6 litres is the total amount of solution, not just the disinfectant's share of it. Giving 5.4 litres works out the water's share (6 × 9 ÷ 10 = 5.4), not the disinfectant's.
(c) Yes — 700 ÷ 7 = 100 ml for the 1 part of concentrate — Method: add the ratio parts to find the total number of parts, divide the total volume by this, then use the ratio to find concentrate's share. Working: 1 + 6 = 7 parts. 700 ÷ 7 = 100 ml per part. Concentrate = 1 part = 100 ml, so Freya is correct. Wrong options: 'divide 700 by 6' uses only one of the ratio numbers instead of the total of 7 parts, giving about 117 ml; '600 ml is concentrate' swaps which ratio number belongs to the concentrate and which belongs to the water; 'half of 700 ml should be concentrate' ignores the ratio altogether and assumes an equal split.
(a) 135 km — Method: find the distance travelled on one litre, then scale up to 9 litres. Working: 90 ÷ 6 = 15 km per litre, so 15 × 9 = 135 km. Answer: 135 km. 45 km comes from working out the extra distance for the extra 3 litres (15 × 3) but forgetting to add the original 90 km. 60 km comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 6 ÷ 9, instead of finding the rate per litre first. 99 km comes from simply adding the number of litres, 9, onto the original distance, 90, instead of scaling the whole journey.
(a) 20% — Method: a percentage concentration compares the sugar with the whole solution, so add the two masses to get the mass of solution and then scale the ratio of sugar to solution to a denominator of 100. Working: the solution has a mass of 200 + 50 = 250 g; sugar:solution = 50:250, and scaling to per 100 gives 50 ÷ 250 × 100 = 20, so the ratio is 20:100. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 25% comes from comparing the sugar with the 200 g of water, 50:200, rather than with the whole solution; 80% is the percentage of the solution that is water, 200:250, which answers for the wrong part of the mixture; 0.2% comes from working out 50 ÷ 250 = 0.2 and writing that decimal down as a percentage without multiplying by 100.
(c) 5 hours — Method: measure the job in decorator-hours, which is in the same ratio as the number of rooms, then share the decorator-hours between the decorators available. Working: 5 decorators × 6 hours = 30 decorator-hours for 3 rooms, so one room takes 30 ÷ 3 = 10 decorator-hours; 5 rooms take 5 × 10 = 50 decorator-hours; shared between 10 decorators that is 50 ÷ 10 = 5 hours. Answer: 5 hours. The distractors: 3 hours comes from halving the 6 hours because the number of decorators doubles, while forgetting that there are also more rooms to paint; 10 hours comes from scaling the 6 hours up for the rooms only, 6 × 5 ÷ 3, and leaving the workforce at 5 decorators; 6 hours comes from assuming that doubling the decorators and increasing the rooms cancel each other out, which they do not, because the rooms rise by a factor of 5/3 and the workforce by a factor of 2.
(c) 250 miles — Find the distance travelled in 1 hour: 150 ÷ 3 = 50 miles. Multiply by 5 hours: 50 × 5 = 250 miles. Giving 300 miles doubles the original distance (150 × 2 = 300) using a scale factor of 2 instead of the correct 5 ÷ 3. Giving 200 miles adds only one extra hour's distance, 50, instead of the two extra hours actually needed (150 + 50 = 200, rather than 150 + 100). Giving 90 miles divides by the scale factor instead of multiplying (150 × 3 ÷ 5 = 90).
(b) 12 cm — Method: height:width = 3:2 means both lengths are built from parts of the same size, so write 3:2 = 18:x, find one part and multiply by the number of parts in the width. Working: the height is 3 parts and measures 18 cm, so one part is 18 ÷ 3 = 6 cm; the width is 2 parts, so 2 × 6 = 12 cm. Answer: 12 cm. The distractors: 27 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 18 ÷ 2 × 3, which makes the width longer than the height even though 2 is the smaller part; 6 cm is the value of one part, given as the width instead of being doubled; 17 cm comes from treating the ratio as a difference — 3 − 2 = 1, so 1 cm is taken off the height — but a ratio scales the lengths, it does not subtract from them.
(d) Yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6 — Method: two ratios are equal when their cross-products are equal, so multiply the first part of each ratio by the second part of the other. Working: 4 × 9 = 36 and 6 × 6 = 36; the two products match, so the ratios are equal, and simplifying both to 2:3 shows the same thing. Answer: yes, because 4 × 9 = 6 × 6. The distractors: the reason that the number 6 appears in both ratios reaches the right verdict from a surface match, since a figure shared by two ratios says nothing about equivalence — 4:6 and 6:5 share a 6 and are not equal; the reason built on 9 − 6 and 6 − 4 compares the differences inside each ratio, 3 against 2, which is additive thinking and ends at a verdict of no; the reason built on 4 × 6 and 6 × 9 multiplies the two parts of each ratio together instead of across the pair, giving 24 against 54 and again a verdict of no.
(d) 24 — Method: split 60 into 3 + 7 = 10 equal parts, find the value of one part, then use the difference in ratio parts. Working: 60 ÷ 10 = 6, so the numbers are 3 × 6 = 18 and 7 × 6 = 42, and their difference is 42 − 18 = 24. Answer: 24. 4 comes from finding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 3, but forgetting to multiply by the value of one part. 60 comes from adding the two numbers back together instead of subtracting, which just repeats the given sum. 80 comes from dividing 60 by the first ratio number, 3, instead of by the total number of parts, 10, giving a part value of 20 and a difference of 7 × 20 − 3 × 20 = 80.
(a) 42 — Find the value of one part: 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Find the number of dogs: 4 × 6 = 24. Add the cats and the dogs to find the total: 18 + 24 = 42. (24 is the number of dogs only, not the total number of animals. 126 comes from multiplying the number of cats by the total number of parts, 18 × 7, instead of finding one part first. 25 comes from adding the ratio numbers 3 and 4 directly to the number of cats.)
(c) £450 — Method: use the equal ratios 4:5 = 200:x to find Grace's savings, then add the two amounts. Working: Noah's £200 is 4 parts, so one part is £200 ÷ 4 = £50; Grace has 5 parts, so 5 × £50 = £250; altogether £200 + £250 = £450. Answer: £450. The distractors: £250 is Grace's savings on their own, which is the middle step rather than the total the question asks for; £360 comes from reading £200 as the 5 parts instead of the 4, giving one part of £40 and a total of 9 × £40; £400 comes from doubling £200, which treats the two savings as equal and ignores the ratio altogether.
(a) 18 — Method: write both numbers with the same multiplier, turn the second ratio into an equation by cross-multiplying, solve for the multiplier and then build A from it. Working: let A = 3k and B = 5k, so 3k : (5k + 6) = 1 : 2; cross-multiplying gives 2 × 3k = 5k + 6, so 6k = 5k + 6 and k = 6; A = 3 × 6 = 18. Answer: 18, and the check works, because B = 30, B + 6 = 36 and 18:36 = 1:2. The distractors: 9 comes from reading the 6 as the difference between the two numbers — 5 − 3 = 2 parts, so one part is 3 and A is 3 × 3 — but the 6 is added to B, it is not the gap between A and B; 6 comes from solving A : (A + 6) = 1 : 2, adding the 6 to A instead of to B; 30 is the value of B, found from the correct multiplier but given in place of A.
(c) 30 — Method: use y = kx and find k from the given pair of values, then substitute x = 12. Working: k = 20 ÷ 8 = 2.5, so y = 2.5 × 12 = 30. Answer: 30. 24 comes from treating the relationship as additive, adding the increase in x (12 − 8 = 4) straight onto y (20 + 4 = 24), instead of multiplying by k. 14.5 comes from finding k correctly (2.5) but then adding it to x instead of multiplying (12 + 2.5 = 14.5). 4.8 comes from finding k upside down, 8 ÷ 20 = 0.4, and multiplying by x: 12 × 0.4 = 4.8.
(d) £24 — Add the parts of the ratio: 2 + 3 + 7 = 12. Find the value of one part: £96 ÷ 12 = £8. Cara's share is 3 parts: 3 × £8 = £24. (£16 is Ben's share, 2 × £8, not Cara's. £56 is Dev's share, 7 × £8, not Cara's. £28.80 comes from wrongly adding the ratio parts as 10 instead of 12, giving one part = £9.60.)

Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.