Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) Reflect in the y-axis, +2 in x; roots 3, −2 — f(2 − x) is zero exactly when 2 − x equals one of f's roots: 2 − x = −1 or 2 − x = 4. Solving each correctly (x = 2 − (−1) = 3, and x = 2 − 4 = −2) gives the new roots x = 3 and x = −2. This is the same as reflecting y = f(x) in the y-axis to get f(−x), then translating 2 units in the positive x-direction to get f(−(x − 2)) = f(2 − x). Solving 2 − x = k as x = k − 2 instead of x = 2 − k is a sign slip when rearranging, and gives x = −3 and x = 2. Translating +2 in x with no reflection at all uses f(x − 2), whose roots are the original roots plus 2: x = 1 and x = 6 — this misses the reflection completely. Assuming 'no overall change' wrongly treats a reflection-and-translation pair as always cancelling out, when here the roots genuinely move, from x = −1 and x = 4 to x = 3 and x = −2.
- (a) 2x − 1 — Swap x and y: x = (y + 1)/2. Multiply both sides by 2: 2x = y + 1. Subtract 1 from both sides: y = 2x − 1, so f⁻¹(x) = 2x − 1. Writing 2x + 1 comes from not flipping the sign on the 1 when it is moved across the equals sign. Writing (x − 1)/2 comes from reversing the sign of the 1 but leaving the ÷2 from the original rule in place, instead of turning it into ×2. Writing x/2 − 1 comes from dividing only the x by 2 and treating the 1 as already outside the fraction.
- (c) P — Sequence P has a common ratio of 2 (4 × 2 = 8, 8 × 2 = 16, 16 × 2 = 32), so it is geometric. Sequence Q has a common difference of 4, which is arithmetic, not geometric — a candidate who confuses a constant difference with a constant ratio picks Q. Sequence R has increasing differences of 3, 5, 7, a quadratic sequence, not geometric — a candidate who assumes any fast-growing sequence must be geometric picks R. Sequence S is the square numbers from 2² onwards (2², 3², 4², 5²), which is also quadratic, not geometric — a candidate who thinks squaring always means geometric growth picks S.
- (b) 6 — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis turns the minimum point (2, −3) into a maximum point at (2, 3), since −f(x) negates every y-value: −(−3) = 3. Adding a then gives 3 + a = 9, so a = 9 − 3 = 6. Forgetting the reflection and using the original y-value of −3 gives −3 + a = 9, so a = 12 — this ignores that −f(x) changes the sign of the y-coordinate before a is added. Writing a = −12 comes from subtracting in the wrong order, working out 9 − (−3) as −3 − 9 instead. Writing a = −6 comes from taking the negative of the correct answer, as if the final value of a needed to be reflected too, on top of the turning point.
- (b) £47, and T=15+8h is a formula (relates T and h). — The charge is £15 fixed plus £8 for each hour: T=15+8h, so for h=4, T=15+8×4=15+32=47. Because T=15+8h relates two different quantities, the total charge T and the number of hours h, it is a formula, not an equation — an equation is solved for one particular value of an unknown, but this relationship holds for every value of h a job might last. A candidate who forgets to include the fixed £15 fee would compute only 8×4=32. A candidate who adds the three numbers in the formula together instead of multiplying the hourly rate by the number of hours would compute 15+8+4=27. A candidate who correctly finds the charge but mistakes the formula for an equation, treating it as something to be solved for one specific value of h rather than a general relationship between T and h, would pick the correct charge with the wrong classification.
- (b) x = −3, y = −7 — x² + 6x + 2 = (x + 3)² − 3² + 2 = (x + 3)² − 7. Substituting x = −3: (−3)² = 9, 6 × (−3) = −18, so 9 − 18 + 2 = −7, confirming the minimum value −7 at x = −3: turning point (−3, −7). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket gives (x + 6)² − 34, turning point (−6, −34) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (3, −7) — wrong, because (x + 3)² is zero at x = −3, not x = 3. Computing 9 − 2 = 7 instead of 2 − 9 = −7 flips the sign of the constant, giving (−3, 7) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 2 minus 9, not 9 minus 2. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (d) g is one-to-one: f(3) = f(−3), removed by x ≥ 0 — A function has an inverse only if it is one-to-one: every output must come from exactly one input. f(3) = 9 and f(−3) = 9, so two different inputs give the same output, and there is no way to send 9 back to a single input — f is not one-to-one over all real x. Restricting the domain to x ≥ 0 removes one of the two inputs behind every such pair, so g is one-to-one and does have an inverse. 'g's outputs are positive; f's could be negative' is wrong because f(x) = x² also only gives outputs of 0 or more — the outputs of f and g are identical sets; it is the INPUTS that differ, not the outputs. 'Restricting any domain always creates an inverse' is wrong because a restriction only helps if it actually removes the repeated outputs: restricting f(x) = x² to x ≥ −3 still leaves f(1) = f(−1) = 1, so that restricted function is still not one-to-one and still has no inverse. 'Squares can never be reversed, under any conditions' is wrong because √9 = 3 does reverse 3² = 9 once you know the input was non-negative — a square root just cannot tell you WHICH of two inputs you started from unless the domain has already ruled one of them out.
- (a) 19 — Each time x increases by 1, y increases by 3 (4, 7, 10, 13 — a constant difference of 3). So at x = 4, y = 13 + 3 = 16, and at x = 5, y = 16 + 3 = 19. A candidate who stops one step early, giving the value for x = 4 instead of x = 5, answers 16. A candidate who overcounts and adds three steps of 3 instead of two from x = 3 gets 13 + 9 = 22. A candidate who mistakes the y-intercept (4) for the common difference and adds 4 twice from x = 3 gets 13 + 8 = 21.
- (a) (n − 5)/2 — Method: do the subtraction first, keep it together as a single bracket, then divide that whole bracket by 2. Working: 'subtract 5 from n' is (n − 5); 'divide the result by 2' means the whole bracket goes over 2, giving (n − 5)/2. Answer: (n − 5)/2. n/2 − 5 comes from dividing n by 2 first and only then subtracting 5, the wrong order. 2(n − 5) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. (5 − n)/2 comes from subtracting n from 5 instead of subtracting 5 from n, the wrong way round.
- (d) 30° and 150° — The first solution is x = 30°, since sin 30° = 0.5. The graph of y = sin x is symmetrical about x = 90° between 0° and 180°, so the second solution is 180° − 30° = 150°. Adding 180° to the first solution instead of subtracting it from 180° gives 30° and 210°, but sin 210° = −0.5, not 0.5. Reflecting the first solution about x = 90° by adding 30° to 90° instead of subtracting from 180° gives 30° and 120°, but sin 120° = √3/2, not 0.5. Misremembering the standard value and using sin 45° = 0.5 instead of sin 30° = 0.5 gives 45° and 135°, but sin 45° = √2/2, not 0.5.
- (c) y = −x + 30 — Method: in a linear model the value at the start is the constant term and the steady rate of change is the gradient, which is negative when the quantity is falling. Working: at x = 0 the candle is 30 cm tall, so the constant term is 30; it loses 1 cm every hour, so the gradient is −1 and the height after x hours is y = −x + 30. Answer: y = −x + 30. The distractors: y = x + 30 comes from taking the rate as +1 and making the candle grow rather than shrink; y = 30x − 1 comes from building the model correctly as 30 − 1x and then copying it into the form y = mx + c with the two numbers left where they stood, so the starting height 30 ends up multiplying x and the hourly 1 is left behind as the constant being taken away; y = −30x + 1 comes from reading the two numbers the other way round, taking 30 cm per hour as the rate and 1 cm as the starting height, which burns 30 cm an hour from a candle only 1 cm tall.
- (d) The fixed call-out fee, charged before the hourly rate. — Method: compare the formula with C = (fixed charge) + (rate) × h, where the fixed charge is the part that does not depend on h. Working: in C = 40 + 25h, the term 25h depends on the number of hours, h, but 40 does not change however many hours the job takes. Answer: 40 is the fixed call-out fee. 'The hourly rate' confuses the fixed term with the coefficient of h, which is actually 25. 'The total cost for a job lasting 1 hour' comes from substituting h = 1 into the formula (40 + 25 = 65) rather than reading off the constant term. 'The number of hours worked before charging starts' wrongly treats the constant, which is in pounds, as if it were measured in hours.
- (d) line 2 — Line 1 correctly represents three consecutive integers using n. Line 2 adds them: n + (n + 1) + (n + 2). Collecting terms: the n-terms give 3n, and the constants give 1 + 2 = 3, so the correct sum is 3n + 3, not 3n + 2 as Line 2 states — this is the first error, an arithmetic slip in collecting the constant terms. Lines 3 and 4 both follow correctly from Line 2's incorrect result, but that result itself is wrong: the true sum, 3n + 3 = 3(n + 1), is a multiple of 3 for every whole number n. Check the working of each line against what came before it, in order, rather than judging whether the final conclusion feels right — an error that flips the conclusion can sit several lines before the line that states it.
- (a) y = −2x + 3 — Method: find the step in the outputs for each step of 1 in the input — falling outputs mean a negative multiplier — then read off the output when the input is 0, because that is the number added on. Working: the outputs 5, 3, 1, −1 fall by 2 each time x rises by 1, so x is multiplied by −2; the output at x = 0 is 3, so 3 is added. Answer: y = −2x + 3, checked at x = 2 by −2 × 2 + 3 = −1. The distractors: y = 2x + 3 comes from taking the size of the step, 2, as the multiplier and ignoring the fact that the outputs are falling; y = −2x − 3 comes from using the correct multiplier but writing the number added on as −3 instead of the output 3 listed at x = 0; y = −x + 4 comes from taking the multiplier as −1, its size read from the step of 1 in the inputs instead of the step of 2 in the outputs and its sign from the fact that the outputs fall, and then fitting the number added on to the pair x = −1, y = 5.
- (c) −0.5 — fg(x) = f(g(x)) = f(x²) = x² + 2. gf(x) = g(f(x)) = g(x + 2) = (x + 2)² = x² + 4x + 4. Setting fg(x) = gf(x): x² + 2 = x² + 4x + 4. Subtract x² from both sides: 2 = 4x + 4. Subtract 4 from both sides: −2 = 4x, so x = −0.5. Writing 1.5 comes from adding the 4 instead of subtracting it: 4x = 2 + 4 = 6, giving x = 1.5. Writing 'no solution' comes from expanding (x + 2)² as x² + 4 using (a + b)² = a² + b², losing the middle term — the equation then reads x² + 2 = x² + 4, which has no solution, but the expansion itself is wrong. Writing 0 comes from treating gf(x) as g(x) + f(x) instead of g(f(x)): x² + (x + 2) = x² + 2 gives x = 0, but that adds the two functions rather than composing them.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.