Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 60 km/h — Method: the gradient of a distance-time graph is the change in distance divided by the change in time, and for a journey at a steady rate that gradient is the speed. Working: the change in distance is 195 − 15 = 180 km and the change in time is 3 hours, so the gradient is 180 ÷ 3 = 60 km/h. Answer: 60 km/h. The distractors: 180 km/h comes from stopping at the change in distance and never dividing by the 3 hours; 195 km/h comes from reading the final marker as the rate instead of working with the change between the two markers; 3 km/h comes from quoting the time taken, which belongs on the bottom of the fraction, as though it were the value of the fraction itself.
- (a) (n − 5)/2 — Method: do the subtraction first, keep it together as a single bracket, then divide that whole bracket by 2. Working: 'subtract 5 from n' is (n − 5); 'divide the result by 2' means the whole bracket goes over 2, giving (n − 5)/2. Answer: (n − 5)/2. n/2 − 5 comes from dividing n by 2 first and only then subtracting 5, the wrong order. 2(n − 5) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. (5 − n)/2 comes from subtracting n from 5 instead of subtracting 5 from n, the wrong way round.
- (c) 5 — Method: let a be the number of adult tickets, so the number of child tickets is 9 − a. Form the equation 10a + 6(9 − a) = 74. Working: expand the bracket: 10a + 54 − 6a = 74, so 4a = 20, giving a = 5. Answer: 5 adult tickets. 4 comes from correctly finding the number of child tickets but reporting it instead of the number of adult tickets asked for. 1.25 comes from a sign error expanding the bracket, writing 10a + 54 + 6a = 74 instead of subtracting, which gives 16a = 20. 7.4 comes from dividing the total takings by the adult ticket price only, ignoring the children entirely, 74 ÷ 10.
- (c) Correct: 3y = 4 − x gives f⁻¹(x) = (4 − x)/3 — Swap x and y: x = 4 − 3y. Add 3y to both sides and subtract x from both sides: 3y = 4 − x. Divide by 3: y = (4 − x)/3, which is exactly what Ben wrote — his rearrangement is correct. Check with a value: f(1) = 4 − 3 = 1, and Ben's formula gives (4 − 1)/3 = 1, which matches. 'Correct, but only because f is its own inverse' gives the right verdict for a false reason — f(f(x)) = 4 − 3(4 − 3x) = 9x − 8, which is not x, so f is not self-inverse; Ben's rearrangement is correct for the ordinary algebraic reason above, not because of any special property of f. 'Wrong: sign kept, giving (−4 − x)/3' comes from not carrying the swap through consistently — testing x = 1 gives (−4 − 1)/3 = −5/3, which does not equal 1, so it is wrong. 'Wrong: correct inverse is (x − 4)/3' comes from writing 3y = x − 4 instead of 3y = 4 − x, a sign slip when isolating y — testing x = 1 gives (1 − 4)/3 = −1, which again does not equal 1.
- (a) {x : x < −3} ∪ {x : x ≥ 1} — "Less than −3" stays strict, since the wording never says "or equal to": x < −3. "Greater than or equal to 1" is inclusive: x ≥ 1. These are two separate, non-overlapping ranges joined with "or", so in set notation they are combined with the union symbol: {x : x < −3} ∪ {x : x ≥ 1}. Distractor routes: {x : x ≤ −3} ∪ {x : x > 1} swaps the strict and inclusive signs, marking −3 as included and 1 as excluded, the opposite of the wording. {x : −3 < x ≤ 1} treats "or" as "and", joining the two conditions into one continuous interval between the values instead of a union of two separate ranges. {x : x > −3} ∪ {x : x ≤ 1} reverses both inequality directions; the two reversed ranges then overlap and between them cover every number on the number line, so that set is the whole of the real line rather than the two separate ranges the description asks for.
- (a) (6, 8) — Method: a point lies on the circle x² + y² = 100 exactly when the squares of its two coordinates add to 100, so square both coordinates of each point and add them. Working: for (6, 8), 6² + 8² = 36 + 64 = 100, which matches the right-hand side of the equation. Answer: (6, 8) lies on the circle. The distractors: (3, 4) is the 3, 4, 5 right-angled triangle recalled but never scaled up to a radius of 10, and 3² + 4² = 25, so it lies on the far smaller circle x² + y² = 25; (5, 5) has coordinates adding to 10, which compares the sum of the coordinates with the radius instead of the sum of their squares with r², and 5² + 5² = 50; (10, 10) takes each coordinate separately to equal the radius, and 10² + 10² = 200, which is twice too big.
- (d) It crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. — y = x² − 9 factorises as (x − 3)(x + 3), since 9 = 3², so the curve crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. Saying it crosses once at x = 9 mistakes the constant term for a root directly, without taking its square root. Saying it crosses at x = 9 and x = −9 makes the same mistake but adds a sign either way. Saying it does not cross the x-axis confuses the y-intercept, which is negative at (0, −9), with the number of times the curve meets the x-axis — a negative y-intercept combined with an upward-opening curve guarantees it crosses the x-axis twice.
- (d) 6 — Method: collect the x-terms on one side and the constants on the other, then divide by the remaining coefficient of x. Working: 6x − 3x = 13 + 5, so 3x = 18, x = 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Answer: x = 6. 2.67 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 13 − 5 = 8, x = 8 ÷ 3 ≈ 2.67. 2 comes from a sign error when moving the x-term, adding instead of subtracting: 9x = 18, x = 2. 18 comes from correctly finding 3x = 18 but forgetting to divide by 3.
- (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.
- (d) (5x − 1)/(x² − x − 2) — The common denominator is (x + 1)(x − 2) = x² − x − 2. The numerator becomes 2(x − 2) + 3(x + 1) = (2x − 4) + (3x + 3) = 5x − 1, so the sum is (5x − 1)/(x² − x − 2). Choosing 5/(2x − 1) adds the numerators (2 + 3 = 5) and the denominators ((x + 1) + (x − 2) = 2x − 1) directly, which is not how fractions add. Choosing (5x + 1)/(x² − x − 2) comes from expanding 2(x − 2) as 2x − 2 instead of 2x − 4, losing part of the constant term. Choosing (5x − 1)/(x² + x − 2) has the correct numerator but the wrong sign on the x-term when (x + 1)(x − 2) is expanded.
- (b) 3 — Method: a term is any part of an expression separated from the rest by a + or − sign, including a number on its own. Working: 8 − 3x + 5x² splits at the + and − signs into 8, −3x and 5x² — that is three separate terms. Answer: 3. Ryan's answer of 2 comes from wrongly excluding the number 8, thinking a term must contain a letter. 5 comes from miscounting by treating the coefficients and powers as separate terms as well as the letters. 1 comes from treating the whole expression as a single term because it is written without brackets.
- (d) 2x = 10 — Method: collect the x-terms on one side and the constants on the other, keeping the equals sign balanced. Working: 5x − 3x = 8 + 2, giving 2x = 10. Answer: 2x = 10. 2x = 6 comes from a sign error moving the constant, subtracting instead of adding: 8 − 2 = 6. 8x = 6 comes from adding the x-terms instead of subtracting them (5x + 3x = 8x), alongside the constant sign error. 2x = −10 comes from a sign error moving the constant the other way: −2 − 8 = −10.
- (d) 40 m — Each trapezium has width 2. Its area is width × the average of its two heights. Strip 1: average of 0 and 5 is 2.5, so area = 2 × 2.5 = 5. Strip 2: average of 5 and 9 is 7, so area = 2 × 7 = 14. Strip 3: average of 9 and 12 is 10.5, so area = 2 × 10.5 = 21. Total distance = 5 + 14 + 21 = 40 m. Leaving out the division by 2 in the averaging step doubles every strip, giving 80 m instead of 40 m. Using only the LEFT height of each strip as a rectangle, 0 × 2 + 5 × 2 + 9 × 2 = 28, or only the RIGHT height, 5 × 2 + 9 × 2 + 12 × 2 = 52, both ignore that the graph curves between the two ends of each strip — always average the two heights of a trapezium, never use just one of them.
- (c) Wrong — the product is −4/25, not −1. — The student's rearrangement is correct: 5y = −2x + 15 gives y = −(2/5)x + 3, gradient −2/5. But the test for perpendicularity is that the product of the two gradients equals exactly −1, not merely that it is negative. Here 2/5 × (−2/5) = −4/25, which is not −1, so the lines are NOT perpendicular. Distractor routes: "a negative product always means perpendicular" states a rule that does not exist — many pairs of lines have a negative gradient product without being perpendicular, as this pair shows. "The rearrangement is incorrect" wrongly blames a correct step; 5y = −2x + 15 does rearrange to y = −(2/5)x + 3. "2/5 and −2/5 are negatives of each other" notices a true but irrelevant fact — being negatives of each other is not the perpendicularity condition; an exact product of −1 is.
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.