Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 36 — (2n)² means the whole of 2n is squared, so with n = 3: (2n)² = (2 × 3)² = 6² = 36. Answering 18 instead works out 2n² — squaring only the n and then multiplying by 2 — which is a different expression because the brackets around 2n are missing. Answering 12 squares only the coefficient, treating (2n)² as 2² × n = 4 × 3 = 12, and forgets to square the n as well. Answering 9 ignores the coefficient of 2 altogether and works out n² on its own. The value of (2n)² when n = 3 is 36.
- (d) x = (y + 3)/4 — Two operations have been applied to x: it has been multiplied by 4 and then 3 has been subtracted. Undo them in the opposite order. Adding 3 to both sides gives y + 3 = 4x. Dividing both sides by 4 then gives (y + 3)/4 = x, so x = (y + 3)/4. The bracket matters: writing y/4 + 3 divides only the y by 4 and leaves the 3 untouched. Writing (y − 3)/4 subtracts the 3 instead of adding it, and writing 4(y + 3) multiplies by 4 rather than dividing.
- (b) x = −3, y = −7 — x² + 6x + 2 = (x + 3)² − 3² + 2 = (x + 3)² − 7. Substituting x = −3: (−3)² = 9, 6 × (−3) = −18, so 9 − 18 + 2 = −7, confirming the minimum value −7 at x = −3: turning point (−3, −7). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket gives (x + 6)² − 34, turning point (−6, −34) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (3, −7) — wrong, because (x + 3)² is zero at x = −3, not x = 3. Computing 9 − 2 = 7 instead of 2 − 9 = −7 flips the sign of the constant, giving (−3, 7) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 2 minus 9, not 9 minus 2. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (c) Wrong — the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. — Rearranging x − 2 = x² − 4x + 2 by moving every term across: 0 = x² − 4x + 2 − x + 2 = x² − 5x + 4. The candidate's x-term is wrong: combining −4x with the moved −x gives −4x − x = −5x, not −3x. So the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. Distractor routes: "x² − 3x + 4 = 0 is correct" simply agrees with the candidate's sign error without checking it. "It should be x² − 5x − 4 = 0" correctly spots that something is wrong but blames the wrong term — the constant, 2 + 2 = 4, is correct; the error is in the x-term. "Subtracting is the same as adding" states something false: subtracting a term and adding it give different signs.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (d) The fixed call-out fee, charged before the hourly rate. — Method: compare the formula with C = (fixed charge) + (rate) × h, where the fixed charge is the part that does not depend on h. Working: in C = 40 + 25h, the term 25h depends on the number of hours, h, but 40 does not change however many hours the job takes. Answer: 40 is the fixed call-out fee. 'The hourly rate' confuses the fixed term with the coefficient of h, which is actually 25. 'The total cost for a job lasting 1 hour' comes from substituting h = 1 into the formula (40 + 25 = 65) rather than reading off the constant term. 'The number of hours worked before charging starts' wrongly treats the constant, which is in pounds, as if it were measured in hours.
- (d) a/2 — Method: write both terms over the same denominator, subtract the numerators, then cancel the fraction down. Working: 6 is a multiple of 3, so a/3 is rewritten as 2a/6; the calculation becomes 5a/6 − 2a/6 = 3a/6, and dividing numerator and denominator by 3 gives a/2. Answer: a/2. The distractors: 4a/3 comes from subtracting the denominators as well as the numerators, giving (5 − 1)a over (6 − 3); 2a/3 comes from subtracting 1 from 5 without first rewriting a/3 as 2a/6, giving 4a/6; 7a/6 comes from adding the two fractions instead of subtracting them, giving 5a/6 + 2a/6.
- (b) 4 — Method: form the equation 30 + 25h = 130, where h is the number of hours, then solve for h. Working: subtract the call-out fee from the total bill: 25h = 130 − 30 = 100. Divide by the hourly rate: h = 100 ÷ 25 = 4. Answer: 4 hours. 5.2 comes from dividing the whole bill by the hourly rate without subtracting the fixed fee first, 130 ÷ 25. 3.5 comes from swapping the fee and the rate, subtracting the rate from the bill and dividing by the fee, (130 − 25) ÷ 30. 6.4 comes from adding the call-out fee to the bill instead of subtracting it, before dividing by the rate, (130 + 30) ÷ 25.
- (c) 72 m — The first section is a triangle with base 4 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 4 × 8 = 16 m. The middle section is a rectangle with base 6 s and height 8 m/s, area = 6 × 8 = 48 m. The final section is a triangle with base 2 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 2 × 8 = 8 m. Total distance = 16 + 48 + 8 = 72 m. Treating both sloping sections as full rectangles instead of triangles — forgetting the factor of a half — gives 4 × 8 + 6 × 8 + 2 × 8 = 96 m, which is wrong because a sloping speed-time section is a triangle, not a rectangle. Leaving out the final, decreasing section entirely gives 16 + 48 = 64 m, which is wrong because the cyclist is still moving and covering distance while slowing down. Leaving out the middle, constant-speed section gives 16 + 8 = 24 m, which is wrong because the cyclist covers the most distance of all during the 6 seconds of constant speed.
- (b) (−5, −2) — A rotation of 180° about the origin reverses the sign of both coordinates, so Q = (−5, −2). A candidate who reverses the sign of only the y-coordinate, as if reflecting in the x-axis, gets (5, −2). A candidate who reverses the sign of only the x-coordinate, as if reflecting in the y-axis, gets (−5, 2). A candidate who swaps the coordinates instead of reversing their signs gets (2, 5).
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
- (c) 10 m/s — A symmetric chord gradient uses the two points either side of t = 3: (2, 40) and (4, 60). The gradient is the change in height divided by the change in time: (60 − 40) ÷ (4 − 2) = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 m/s. Using only the values either side of one gap, (2, 40) and (3, 54), instead of the full symmetric chord, gives (54 − 40) ÷ (3 − 2) = 14 m/s. Getting the correct number but dropping the time unit, leaving only metres, gives 10 m. Dividing time by height instead of height by time inverts the calculation to (4 − 2) ÷ (60 − 40) = 0.1 s/m.
- (c) (0, 0) — A curve crosses the y-axis where x = 0. Substituting x = 0 into y = x³ − 4x gives y = 0³ − 4(0) = 0 − 0 = 0, so the curve crosses the y-axis at (0, 0). A candidate who reads off the coefficient of x as the y-intercept, instead of working out the constant term, might write (0, −4). A candidate who swaps the coordinates might write (4, 0). A candidate who takes the coefficient of x but drops its sign might write (0, 4).
- (c) No — that moment has already passed — Method: call the number of years from now x, add x to both ages, form the equation from the comparison and then interpret the value of x that comes out. Working: in x years Harry will be 14 + x and Mia will be 8 + x, so 14 + x = 2(8 + x); expanding gives 14 + x = 16 + 2x, and subtracting x and 16 from both sides gives x = −2. A negative value of x places the moment two years in the past, when Harry was 12 and Mia was 6 and 12 = 2 × 6, so it is not something still to come. Answer: no — that moment has already passed. The distractors: the claim that it has never happened and never will comes from reaching x = −2 and reading a negative number of years as no solution at all, when x = −2 does not say that no such moment exists but says where it is — two years before now; the claim that it happens when Harry is 16 comes from doubling Mia's present age, 2 × 8 = 16, and reading that as the age Harry has to reach; the claim that it happens when Harry is 20 comes from expanding 2(8 + x) as 8 + 2x, doubling only the x, which gives x = 6.
- (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.