Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 6,400 — 9 hours contains 9 ÷ 3 = 3 whole periods of doubling, so the population is 800 × 2³. Since 2³ = 8, the population after 9 hours is 800 × 8 = 6,400. Adding 100% growth three times instead of compounding it — treating the growth as simple, not repeated doubling — gives 800 × 4 = 3,200, which is wrong because each period doubles the CURRENT population, not the original one. Using 9 as the power instead of dividing by the 3-hour period first gives 800 × 2⁹ = 409,600, which is wrong because the exponent counts periods, not hours. Giving the growth factor 2³ = 8 on its own, without multiplying by the starting population 800, leaves the answer as 8, which is wrong because the question asks for the population, not the multiplier. Always check that your final number of periods matches the total time divided by the period length.
- (b) The total volume of water, in litres, that has flowed in. — On a rate-time graph, the y-axis is in litres per minute and the x-axis is in minutes; multiplying a rate by a time gives litres per minute × minutes = litres, a total volume. So the area under the graph represents the total volume of water that has flowed in. Thinking the area itself represents the rate, rather than what the rate accumulates to, gives the wrong claim about the average rate of flow. Confusing the area with the gradient of the graph — which measures how the rate is changing — gives the wrong claim about litres per minute squared. Ignoring the flow-rate axis and focusing only on the time axis gives the wrong claim that the area is simply the total time.
- (d) 3m³ — Method: multiply the powers of m by adding their indices, then bring the number coefficient to the front. Working: m² × m has indices 2 and 1; add them to get 3, giving m³, then × 3 gives 3m³. Answer: 3m³. 3m² comes from multiplying the indices instead of adding them: 2 × 1 = 2, giving m², then × 3 = 3m². m³ comes from correctly combining the m's but dropping the coefficient 3. m⁶ comes from multiplying the index by the coefficient instead of writing the coefficient in front: taking the 2 in m² and the 3 to give m raised to the power 2 × 3, which is m⁶, with the lone m left out.
- (b) x = −3, y = −7 — x² + 6x + 2 = (x + 3)² − 3² + 2 = (x + 3)² − 7. Substituting x = −3: (−3)² = 9, 6 × (−3) = −18, so 9 − 18 + 2 = −7, confirming the minimum value −7 at x = −3: turning point (−3, −7). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket gives (x + 6)² − 34, turning point (−6, −34) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (3, −7) — wrong, because (x + 3)² is zero at x = −3, not x = 3. Computing 9 − 2 = 7 instead of 2 − 9 = −7 flips the sign of the constant, giving (−3, 7) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 2 minus 9, not 9 minus 2. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (d) x = (y + 3)/4 — Two operations have been applied to x: it has been multiplied by 4 and then 3 has been subtracted. Undo them in the opposite order. Adding 3 to both sides gives y + 3 = 4x. Dividing both sides by 4 then gives (y + 3)/4 = x, so x = (y + 3)/4. The bracket matters: writing y/4 + 3 divides only the y by 4 and leaves the 3 untouched. Writing (y − 3)/4 subtracts the 3 instead of adding it, and writing 4(y + 3) multiplies by 4 rather than dividing.
- (a) 9 m — Undo the multiplication by the bracket first: dividing both sides by 2 gives P/2 = l + w. Subtracting the length from both sides gives w = P/2 − l. Substituting the measurements, 46 ÷ 2 = 23, and 23 − 14 = 9, so the width is 9 m. Taking the length off before halving gives (46 − 14) ÷ 2 = 16, which halves the length as well; expanding to P = 2l + 2w and then forgetting to divide by 2 gives 46 − 28 = 18; subtracting the length in the wrong direction gives 23 + 14 = 37.
- (b) 85 — Substitute n = 10: 10² − 2 × 10 + 5 = 100 − 20 + 5 = 85. A sign error on the −2n term, treating it as +2n, gives 100 + 20 + 5 = 125. Using n = 9 instead of n = 10 gives 81 − 18 + 5 = 68. Working out 10² − 2 × 10 but forgetting to add the final +5 gives 80.
- (b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
- (c) 2 — For a geometric sequence, a₄ = a₂ × r². So r² = a₄ ÷ a₂ = 24 ÷ 6 = 4, giving r = 2 or r = −2. Since all the terms are positive, r = 2. 4 comes from computing a₄ ÷ a₂ = 4 and stopping there, without taking the square root to find r. 18 comes from subtracting instead of dividing: a₄ − a₂ = 24 − 6 = 18, taken directly as the common ratio. −2 is the other square root of 4, but it is rejected because all the sequence's terms are given as positive.
- (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
- (a) 3 and 7 — Method: one equation is linear and the other is not, so rearrange the linear equation and substitute it into the other to leave a single quadratic in one letter. Working: x + y = 10 gives y = 10 − x, so xy = 21 becomes x(10 − x) = 21, which rearranges to x² − 10x + 21 = 0; factorising gives (x − 3)(x − 7) = 0, so the two values are 3 and 7, and 3 + 7 = 10 with 3 × 7 = 21. Answer: 3 and 7. The distractors: 1 and 21 comes from using only the product and taking the first factor pair of 21; −3 and −7 comes from factorising as (x + 3)(x + 7), which reverses the sign of both values; 5 and 5 comes from using only the sum and splitting 10 into two equal parts.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (a) It touches the x-axis once, only at x = 4. — (x − 4)² is a square, so it equals zero only when x − 4 = 0, that is at x = 4 — the curve just touches the x-axis there rather than crossing it, since a square cannot be negative on either side to cross through. Saying it crosses at x = 4 and x = −4 wrongly introduces a plus-or-minus, as if taking a square root of x, rather than recognising the bracket is already squared and only zero once. Saying it never touches the x-axis forgets that a squared term CAN equal zero, even though it can never be negative. Saying it crosses at x = 2 and x = −2 confuses (x − 4)² with the different expression x² − 4.
- (d) L/6 − 4 — Method: find the length of one equal piece first (divide by 6), then apply the later change (subtract 4) to that piece. Working: one piece is L/6 metres; removing 4 metres from it gives L/6 − 4. Answer: L/6 − 4. L/6 + 4 comes from adding the 4 metres instead of removing it. (L − 4)/6 comes from removing the 4 metres from the whole rope before cutting it into pieces, the wrong order. 4 − L/6 comes from subtracting the piece length from 4 instead of the other way round.
- (d) −3 — Substitute y = 11 into y = 5 − 2x, giving 11 = 5 − 2x. Subtracting 5 from both sides gives 6 = −2x, so x = 6 ÷ (−2) = −3. A candidate who mishandles the negative sign when rearranging, treating the equation as 6 = 2x, gets x = 3. A candidate who correctly finds −2x = 6 but forgets to divide by 2 at all gets x = 6. A candidate who adds 5 and 11 instead of subtracting, getting 2x = 16, gets x = 8.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.