Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 2(3x + 1) = 6x + 2 — Expanding 2(3x + 1) = 6x + 2 gives an expression that matches the right-hand side exactly for every value of x — it is an identity. 4x − 3 = 3x + 5 is an ordinary equation with one solution, x = 8. 7 − x = x − 7 is also an ordinary equation with one solution, x = 7. 5x + 1 = 5(x + 1) never holds for any value of x at all, since expanding the right-hand side gives 5x + 5, and 5x + 1 = 5x + 5 would require 1 = 5, which is impossible.
- (b) 25 — Substitute n = 7: 4 × 7 − 3 = 28 − 3 = 25. Forgetting to subtract 3 gives 4 × 7 = 28. Subtracting 3 from 7 before multiplying by 4, 4 × (7 − 3) = 16, applies the operations in the wrong order. Substituting n = 8 by miscounting the position gives 4 × 8 − 3 = 29.
- (b) 3 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c first, then read off the gradient. Working: dividing 4y = 12x + 20 by 4 gives y = 3x + 5, so the gradient is 3. The value 12 comes from reading the coefficient of x before dividing the equation by 4. The value 20 comes from using the constant term of the unsimplified equation instead of the gradient. The value 5 comes from finding the y-intercept, 20 / 4 = 5, and giving that instead of the gradient.
- (c) 6 km/h — Total distance = 8 + 4 = 12 km. Total time = 1 hour + 0.5 hours resting + 0.5 hours = 2 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 12 ÷ 2 = 6 km/h. A speed of 8 km/h comes from leaving the resting time out of the total time: 12 ÷ 1.5 = 8. A speed of 4 km/h comes from dividing by too much time, such as double-counting the rest period: 12 ÷ 3 = 4. A speed of 12 km/h simply gives the total distance and forgets to divide by the total time at all.
- (a) y = 2ˣ — An exponential graph y = 2ˣ passes through (0, 1) since 2⁰ = 1, rises more and more steeply for positive x, and has the x-axis as an asymptote as x becomes very negative, since 2ˣ gets closer to 0 without ever reaching it. y = x² + 1 also passes through (0, 1) and also rises steeply for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it rises to infinity too, rather than settling towards the x-axis — mistaking any curve that gets steeper for an exponential misses this. y = x³ + 1 passes through (0, 1) and rises for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it falls towards negative infinity rather than approaching the x-axis from above. y = 1 − x² also passes through (0, 1), but it falls for large positive x rather than rising — a candidate who checks only the y-intercept, without reading the described shape of the curve, could pick this.
- (b) 60 km/h — Method: the gradient of a distance-time graph is the change in distance divided by the change in time, and for a journey at a steady rate that gradient is the speed. Working: the change in distance is 195 − 15 = 180 km and the change in time is 3 hours, so the gradient is 180 ÷ 3 = 60 km/h. Answer: 60 km/h. The distractors: 180 km/h comes from stopping at the change in distance and never dividing by the 3 hours; 195 km/h comes from reading the final marker as the rate instead of working with the change between the two markers; 3 km/h comes from quoting the time taken, which belongs on the bottom of the fraction, as though it were the value of the fraction itself.
- (c) x = 8 — The turning point lies exactly halfway between the two roots. If the other root is r, the midpoint of −2 and r must be 3, so (−2 + r) ÷ 2 = 3, giving r = 8. Choosing x = 5 comes from adding 2 and 3 rather than using the midpoint relationship correctly. Choosing x = 1 comes from subtracting 2 from 3 instead of reflecting −2 across the turning point. Choosing x = −8 finds the right distance but then reflects in the y-axis instead of in the line of symmetry x = 3, so the sign of the answer is flipped.
- (d) 110 — Method: form the equation 15 + 0.08m = 23.80, where m is the number of minutes, then solve for m. Working: subtract the fixed fee: 0.08m = 23.80 − 15 = 8.80. Divide by the cost per minute: m = 8.80 ÷ 0.08 = 110. Answer: 110 minutes. 1.1 comes from using 8 instead of 0.08 as the cost per minute, forgetting to convert pence to pounds. 297.5 comes from dividing the whole bill by the cost per minute without subtracting the fixed fee first, 23.80 ÷ 0.08. 485 comes from adding the fixed fee to the bill instead of subtracting it, before dividing by the cost per minute, (23.80 + 15) ÷ 0.08.
- (b) 235 litres — The flow rate at t = 10 is the gradient of the tangent: change in volume ÷ change in time = (190 − 130) ÷ (12 − 8) = 60 ÷ 4 = 15 litres per minute. Treating this rate as roughly constant for a short interval, the volume 5 minutes after t = 10 is estimated as 160 + 5 × 15 = 235 litres. Using the tangent's own point spacing — 2 minutes, from t = 10 to t = 12 — instead of the 5 minutes actually asked for gives 160 + 2 × 15 = 190, which is just the volume already given at one of the tangent's own points, not an answer to the question asked. Multiplying the gradient by the time WITHOUT adding the starting volume, 5 × 15 = 75, forgets that a rate estimates a CHANGE, which must be added to the starting volume, not given as the answer on its own. Subtracting instead of adding, 160 − 5 × 15 = 85, extrapolates backward in time rather than forward.
- (d) Overestimate — the curve bends upward (convex). — The first differences of the speeds are 3, 5, 7 and 9, so the second differences are 2, 2 and 2 — constant and positive, which means the speed-time graph curves upwards (is convex). On a convex curve, each straight chord used by the trapezium rule lies above the curve, so the trapezium rule overestimates the true distance. 'Underestimate — the curve bends upward' states the same correct geometry but gets the conclusion backwards — a chord above the curve means too much area is counted, not too little. 'Overestimate — the speed values are increasing' uses the wrong evidence: increasing speed alone doesn't tell you whether the curve bends up or down, only the second differences do. 'Underestimate — second differences are constant' confuses a constant second difference with a steady rate of change in speed, which isn't what the second difference of a speed-time table measures.
- (c) 8n + 7 — Method: find the weekly increase, then find the constant by adjusting the week 1 total. Working: the total goes up by £8 each week (23 − 15 = 8), so the coefficient of n is 8. The constant is the week 1 total minus the common difference: 15 − 8 = 7. Answer: the nth term is 8n + 7. 8n + 15 comes from using the week 1 total, 15, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 8n − 1 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (15 − 8 − 8 = −1) instead of once. 7n + 8 comes from swapping the weekly increase and the constant.
- (b) (3x + 1)(2x − 3) — To factorise 6x² − 7x − 3, look for two numbers that multiply to 6 × (−3) = −18 and add to −7: these are −9 and 2. Splitting the middle term gives 6x² − 9x + 2x − 3, which groups to 3x(2x − 3) + 1(2x − 3) = (3x + 1)(2x − 3). Writing (3x − 1)(2x + 3) comes from using the pair 9 and −2 instead — the right product but the wrong signs, giving +7x instead of −7x. Writing (6x − 1)(x + 3) comes from picking the factor pair 18 and −1: it multiplies to −18 correctly, but it adds to 17, not −7, so checking only the product splits the middle term as 6x² + 18x − x − 3 and pairs the wrong factors of 6 and 3 together. Writing (x − 3)(6x + 1) comes from that same unchecked pair used the other way round, splitting the middle term as 6x² + x − 18x − 3.
- (b) x = 2, y = −5 — 2x² − 8x + 3 rewrites as 2(x² − 4x) + 3, then as 2[(x − 2)² − 4] + 3, which simplifies to 2(x − 2)² − 5, since −2 × 4 + 3 = −5. Substituting x = 2: 2 × 2² = 8, 8 × 2 = 16, so 8 − 16 + 3 = −5, confirming the minimum value −5 at x = 2: turning point x = 2, y = −5. Halving b instead of halving b/a — using 4 as the shift instead of 2 — lands on turning point x = 4, y = −29, which is wrong because when a ≠ 1 the shift inside the bracket is b/(2a), not b/a alone. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives x = −2, y = −5 — wrong, because (x − 2)² is zero at x = 2, not x = −2. Computing 8 − 3 = 5 instead of 3 − 8 = −5 flips the sign of the constant, giving x = 2, y = 5 — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 3 minus 8, not 8 minus 3. Whenever a ≠ 1, factor a out of the x² and x terms first, and always check a turning point by substituting back into the original equation.
- (b) 143 — fg(4) means f(g(4)): work out g(4) first, then substitute the result into f. g(4) = 3 × 4 = 12, then f(12) = 12² − 1 = 144 − 1 = 143. Working out gf(4) instead swaps the order: f(4) = 4² − 1 = 15, then g(15) = 3 × 15 = 45 — that is the wrong composition. Treating f(x) as x − 1 (forgetting to square the input) gives f(12) = 12 − 1 = 11. Applying g twice instead of applying g then f gives g(g(4)) = g(12) = 3 × 12 = 36, which mixes up which function should be applied second.
- (d) 8 — Working backwards by halving (undoing the doubling), one 4-hour step at a time: 9,600 (20 h) → 4,800 (16 h) → 2,400 (12 h) → 1,200 (8 h) → 600 (4 h) → 300 (0 h). Reading these in time order — 300, 600, 1,200, 2,400, 4,800, 9,600 at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 hours — the population is still at or below 1,000 at 4 hours (600) and first goes above 1,000 at 8 hours (1,200). So the recorded population first exceeds 1,000 at 8 hours. Answering 20 just reads off the time stated in the question, without working out when the threshold was actually first crossed — wrong, because 9,600 is only the value AT 20 hours, not necessarily the first time the population passed 1,000. Answering 0 comes from recovering the starting population by dividing 9,600 by 5 (the number of 4-hour gaps up to 20 hours) instead of by 2⁵ = 32 (the correct number of halvings), giving a wrongly-inflated starting value of 9,600 ÷ 5 = 1,920 — already above 1,000 at 0 hours — wrong, because doubling means the value must be halved five times, dividing by 2 five times (2⁵ = 32), not divided once by the number of gaps. Answering 12 comes from halving back only twice, from 9,600 to 4,800 (16 h) to 2,400 (12 h), and stopping there because 2,400 is already above 1,000, without checking that 1,200 at 8 hours is also above 1,000 and occurs earlier — wrong, because the FIRST recorded time above 1,000 is the earliest such time, not the first one reached while working backwards from 20 hours.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.