Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) t = 0 or t = 4 — The ball is at ground level exactly when h = 0. From the table, h = 0 at t = 0 and at t = 4, so those are the two times. Distractor origins: t = 1 or t = 3 picks the times with equal (but non-zero) height instead of ground level; t = 2 picks the time of maximum height instead of ground level; t = 0 finds only the starting time and misses the second one.
- (b) k = 9 — Method: complete the square, because a squared bracket is equal to zero for exactly one value of x. Working: x² − 6x = (x − 3)² − 9, so the equation becomes (x − 3)² − 9 + k = 0, that is (x − 3)² = 9 − k; there is exactly one solution when 9 − k = 0, so k = 9 and the equation reads x² − 6x + 9 = 0 with the repeated solution x = 3. Answer: k = 9. The distractors: k = 3 comes from halving the 6 and not squaring the result; k = 36 comes from squaring the whole of 6 instead of half of it; k = −9 comes from solving 9 − k = 0 with the sign of k the wrong way round.
- (c) y = (5/12)x − 169/12 — The gradient of the radius to (5, −12) is (−12 − 0) ÷ (5 − 0) = −12/5. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at that point, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal, 5/12. Using y − y₁ = m(x − x₁) with (5, −12): y + 12 = (5/12)(x − 5), which gives y = (5/12)x − 169/12. y = −(12/5)x comes from using the radius's own gradient, −12/5, instead of turning it into the perpendicular gradient, and building the line through the origin (as the radius itself does). y = −(5/12)x − 119/12 comes from taking the reciprocal of −12/5 correctly as a size but keeping the wrong sign, using −5/12 instead of 5/12. y = (5/12)x − 25/12 comes from using the correct gradient 5/12 but building the line through (5, 0) instead of (5, −12) — dropping the point's y-coordinate.
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (c) (2, 5) — Reflecting in the x-axis keeps the x-coordinate the same and changes the sign of the y-coordinate: Q = (2, 5). (−2, −5) comes from reflecting in the y-axis instead, which changes the sign of the x-coordinate. (−2, 5) comes from reflecting in both axes. (2, −5) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (b) 319 — Substitute n = 10: 3 × 10² + 2 × 10 − 1 = 3 × 100 + 20 − 1 = 300 + 20 − 1 = 319. A sign error on the +2n term, treating it as −2n, gives 300 − 20 − 1 = 279. Working out 3 × 10² + 2 × 10 but forgetting to subtract the final 1 gives 300 + 20 = 320. Using n = 9 instead of n = 10 gives 3 × 81 + 18 − 1 = 243 + 18 − 1 = 260.
- (c) Correct: 3y = 4 − x gives f⁻¹(x) = (4 − x)/3 — Swap x and y: x = 4 − 3y. Add 3y to both sides and subtract x from both sides: 3y = 4 − x. Divide by 3: y = (4 − x)/3, which is exactly what Ben wrote — his rearrangement is correct. Check with a value: f(1) = 4 − 3 = 1, and Ben's formula gives (4 − 1)/3 = 1, which matches. 'Correct, but only because f is its own inverse' gives the right verdict for a false reason — f(f(x)) = 4 − 3(4 − 3x) = 9x − 8, which is not x, so f is not self-inverse; Ben's rearrangement is correct for the ordinary algebraic reason above, not because of any special property of f. 'Wrong: sign kept, giving (−4 − x)/3' comes from not carrying the swap through consistently — testing x = 1 gives (−4 − 1)/3 = −5/3, which does not equal 1, so it is wrong. 'Wrong: correct inverse is (x − 4)/3' comes from writing 3y = x − 4 instead of 3y = 4 − x, a sign slip when isolating y — testing x = 1 gives (1 − 4)/3 = −1, which again does not equal 1.
- (c) 4(n + 3) — 'Add 3 to n' must happen before 'multiply the result by 4', so the addition needs brackets to show it happens first: 4(n + 3). Writing 4n + 3 multiplies n by 4 immediately and only adds the 3 afterwards, which reverses the order the words describe. Writing n + 3 × 4 only multiplies the 3 by 4, and adds n as a separate, unmultiplied term — it treats 'the result' as just the 3, not the whole of n + 3. Writing 3(n + 4) keeps the correct structure but swaps which number is added and which is multiplied. The expression for 'add 3 to n, then multiply the result by 4' is 4(n + 3).
- (d) 8 — Working backwards by halving (undoing the doubling), one 4-hour step at a time: 9,600 (20 h) → 4,800 (16 h) → 2,400 (12 h) → 1,200 (8 h) → 600 (4 h) → 300 (0 h). Reading these in time order — 300, 600, 1,200, 2,400, 4,800, 9,600 at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 hours — the population is still at or below 1,000 at 4 hours (600) and first goes above 1,000 at 8 hours (1,200). So the recorded population first exceeds 1,000 at 8 hours. Answering 20 just reads off the time stated in the question, without working out when the threshold was actually first crossed — wrong, because 9,600 is only the value AT 20 hours, not necessarily the first time the population passed 1,000. Answering 0 comes from recovering the starting population by dividing 9,600 by 5 (the number of 4-hour gaps up to 20 hours) instead of by 2⁵ = 32 (the correct number of halvings), giving a wrongly-inflated starting value of 9,600 ÷ 5 = 1,920 — already above 1,000 at 0 hours — wrong, because doubling means the value must be halved five times, dividing by 2 five times (2⁵ = 32), not divided once by the number of gaps. Answering 12 comes from halving back only twice, from 9,600 to 4,800 (16 h) to 2,400 (12 h), and stopping there because 2,400 is already above 1,000, without checking that 1,200 at 8 hours is also above 1,000 and occurs earlier — wrong, because the FIRST recorded time above 1,000 is the earliest such time, not the first one reached while working backwards from 20 hours.
- (c) 19 — Method: set up the equation 15 + 9n = 186, then subtract the deposit and divide by the cost per student. Working: 9n = 186 − 15 = 171; n = 171 ÷ 9 = 19. Answer: 19 students. 20.67 comes from dividing the whole £186 by £9 without first subtracting the deposit: 186 ÷ 9 ≈ 20.67. 11.8 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £9 and dividing by £15: (186 − 9) ÷ 15 = 11.8. 22.33 comes from adding the deposit instead of subtracting it: (186 + 15) ÷ 9 ≈ 22.33.
- (a) x = −1.8 and x = 2.8 — Method: the solutions of x² − x − 2 = 3 are the x-coordinates of the points where the curve y = x² − x − 2 meets the line y = 3, read off the grid to 1 decimal place. Working: the curve meets the line y = 3 at approximately x = −1.8 and at x = 2.8. Answer: x ≈ −1.8 and x ≈ 2.8. Distractor refutation: x = −1.0 and x = 2.0 comes from reading where the curve crosses the x-axis (y = 0), solving x² − x − 2 = 0, instead of where it meets the line y = 3. x = −3.0 and x = 4.0 comes from taking the two ends of the drawn curve as the intersection points, instead of finding where it actually crosses the line y = 3. x = 1.8 and x = 2.8 comes from a sign slip on the left-hand intersection, reading it as positive instead of negative.
- (d) 4x + 5 — A minus sign directly before a bracket changes the sign of both terms inside it: 6x − (2x − 5) = 6x − 2x + 5 = 4x + 5. The option 4x − 5 comes from only changing the sign of the 2x term and not the −5, giving 6x − 2x − 5. The option 8x − 5 comes from adding 2x instead of subtracting it, as if the minus sign did not apply to the bracket, giving 6x + 2x − 5. The option 8x + 5 repeats that same addition mistake and also changes the sign of the −5 term.
- (a) Subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. — Method: try to solve the equation as normal and see what happens. Working: subtract 4x from both sides: 4x + 3 − 4x = 4x + 10 − 4x, giving 3 = 10. This statement is false for every value of x, so the equation has no solution. Answer: subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. "x would have to be negative" invents a constraint on x that the equation never states. "It's true for every x" confuses this equation with an identity, where both sides would simplify to the same expression. "x = 7" misreads the false statement 3 = 10 as something to solve for x, rather than recognising it means no solution exists.
- (d) 2x² − 4x + 3 — fg(x) means f(g(x)): substitute g(x) into f in place of x. g(x) = x − 1, so fg(x) = f(x − 1) = 2(x − 1)² + 1. Expanding (x − 1)² = x² − 2x + 1, so fg(x) = 2(x² − 2x + 1) + 1 = 2x² − 4x + 2 + 1 = 2x² − 4x + 3. Writing 2x² comes from working out gf(x) instead — g(f(x)) = f(x) − 1 = (2x² + 1) − 1 = 2x², which applies the functions in the wrong order. Writing 2x² − 1 comes from expanding (x − 1)² as x² − 1, dropping the middle term, so f(x − 1) becomes 2(x² − 1) + 1 = 2x² − 2 + 1 = 2x² − 1. Writing 2x² − 4x + 2 comes from expanding correctly but forgetting the final + 1 from f, stopping at 2(x² − 2x + 1) = 2x² − 4x + 2.
- (c) every value of x except x = −3 — Method: factorise the quadratic, then use the fact that a squared bracket is never negative to decide where the expression is strictly greater than zero. Working: x² + 6x + 9 factorises as (x + 3)², and a square is greater than or equal to 0 for every value of x; (x + 3)² is equal to 0 only when x + 3 = 0, that is when x = −3, so it is strictly greater than 0 at every other value. Answer: every value of x except x = −3. The distractors: 'every value of x, with no exceptions' comes from remembering that a square cannot be negative but forgetting that it can be zero, which a strict > rules out; 'x > −3 only' comes from taking the square root of both sides to get x + 3 > 0 and keeping only that branch; 'x < −3 only' comes from the same square-rooting followed by turning the sign round, as though the step had been a division by a negative number.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.