Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) (40, 0) — Method: a graph crosses the x-axis where y = 0, which in this context is the moment the tank holds no water, so substituting y = 0 and solving gives the time. Working: 0 = −5x + 200 gives 5x = 200, so x = 200 ÷ 5 = 40 and the crossing point is (40, 0); the tank is empty after 40 minutes. Answer: (40, 0). The distractors: (0, 200) is the y-axis crossing, the 200 litres in the tank at the start, found by substituting x = 0 instead of y = 0; (200, 0) comes from reading the constant 200 as the x-coordinate without dividing by the 5 litres lost each minute; (0, 40) has the right number in the wrong place, with the time written as a y-coordinate.
- (b) 6x + 6 — Perimeter = 2[(2x + 5) + (x − 2)] = 2(3x + 3) = 6x + 6. A candidate who adds the length and width but forgets to double for the perimeter gets 3x + 3. A candidate who makes a sign error and adds 2 instead of subtracting it before doubling gets 2[(2x + 5) + (x + 2)] = 6x + 14. A candidate who multiplies the length and width instead of adding them, confusing the perimeter formula with the area formula, and then doubles that product, gets 2(2x + 5)(x − 2) = 4x² + 2x − 20.
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
- (c) 37 — The first differences are 3, 5, 7, 9 — they increase by 2 each time (the second difference), so the next first difference is 11, giving 26+11=37. A candidate who repeats the last first difference (9) instead of increasing it would reach 26+9=35. A candidate who increases the difference by 4 instead of 2 would reach 26+13=39. A candidate who adds only the second difference (2) to the last term, instead of the next first difference, would reach 26+2=28.
- (c) Wrong — the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. — Rearranging x − 2 = x² − 4x + 2 by moving every term across: 0 = x² − 4x + 2 − x + 2 = x² − 5x + 4. The candidate's x-term is wrong: combining −4x with the moved −x gives −4x − x = −5x, not −3x. So the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. Distractor routes: "x² − 3x + 4 = 0 is correct" simply agrees with the candidate's sign error without checking it. "It should be x² − 5x − 4 = 0" correctly spots that something is wrong but blames the wrong term — the constant, 2 + 2 = 4, is correct; the error is in the x-term. "Subtracting is the same as adding" states something false: subtracting a term and adding it give different signs.
- (c) 90° — The graph of y = tan x has a vertical asymptote at x = 90°, the smallest positive value for which it is undefined. tan 0° = 0, a defined value, not an undefined one — confusing where the graph equals zero with where it is undefined gives 0°. x = 270° is also a value where y = tan x is undefined, but it is not the smallest positive one, since 90° comes first. tan 45° = 1, a defined value — confusing the asymptote with the angle at which tan x = 1 gives 45°.
- (b) x = −3, y = −7 — x² + 6x + 2 = (x + 3)² − 3² + 2 = (x + 3)² − 7. Substituting x = −3: (−3)² = 9, 6 × (−3) = −18, so 9 − 18 + 2 = −7, confirming the minimum value −7 at x = −3: turning point (−3, −7). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket gives (x + 6)² − 34, turning point (−6, −34) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (3, −7) — wrong, because (x + 3)² is zero at x = −3, not x = 3. Computing 9 − 2 = 7 instead of 2 − 9 = −7 flips the sign of the constant, giving (−3, 7) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 2 minus 9, not 9 minus 2. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (b) It is not even an ordinary equation with a solution: expanding the left-hand side gives 3x − 12, and 3x − 12 = 3x − 4 would require −12 = −4, which is never true. — Expanding the left-hand side, 3(x − 4) = 3x − 12. Setting this equal to the right-hand side, 3x − 12 = 3x − 4, gives −12 = −4 once the 3x terms are removed from both sides — a statement that is never true, so no value of x satisfies the equation at all, and it is certainly not an identity. The option about substituting a specific value misunderstands algebraic expansion, which holds for every x, not one chosen value. The option matching the first term wrongly assumes that is enough to prove equivalence. The option about multiplying the 4 by 3 on both sides is nonsensical, since there is only one bracket to expand, on the left-hand side.
- (c) y = 2x + 1 — Method: the gradient of the line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x, and the constant is then found by substituting one of the points into y = mx + c. Working: m = (5 − 3) ÷ (2 − 1) = 2 ÷ 1 = 2, so the line is y = 2x + c; substituting x = 1 and y = 3 gives 3 = 2 × 1 + c, so c = 3 − 2 = 1. Answer: y = 2x + 1. The distractors: y = x + 2 comes from taking the gradient as the change in x, 2 − 1 = 1, and then substituting (1, 3) to reach a constant of 2; y = 2x − 1 comes from working out the constant as mx − y, 2 × 1 − 3 = −1, instead of y − mx; y = 2x + 3 comes from using the y-coordinate of (1, 3) as the constant without substituting at all.
- (d) 12√2 — The nth term of a geometric sequence is a × rⁿ⁻¹. Here a = 3, r = √2, n = 6, so the 6th term is 3 × (√2)⁵. Since (√2)² = 2, (√2)⁴ = (2)² = 4, so (√2)⁵ = (√2)⁴ × √2 = 4√2. The 6th term is 3 × 4√2 = 12√2. 15√2 comes from treating (√2)⁵ as 5√2 — multiplying the index by the surd instead of raising √2 to that power — then multiplying by 3 gives 3 × 5√2 = 15√2, which is wrong because powers of a surd do not scale linearly with the index. 24√2 comes from miscalculating (√2)⁴ as 8 instead of 4 (a squaring slip, since (√2)² = 2 but (√2)⁴ should be 2² = 4, not 2 × 4), giving 3 × 8√2 = 24√2. 4√2 comes from forgetting to multiply by the first term a = 3, leaving just (√2)⁵ = 4√2.
- (c) 37.5 — The tangent at (18, 24) is 18x + 24y = 900 (using ax + by = r² with a = 18, b = 24, r² = 900). Setting x = 0 to find the y-intercept: 24y = 900, so y = 37.5. Choosing 900 skips the division by 24 and just repeats the constant. Choosing 50 divides the constant by the x-coefficient 18 instead of the y-coefficient 24. Choosing 1.25 uses the radius 30 instead of r² = 900 as the constant before dividing.
- (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.