Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 22 m — Rearranging P = 2l + 2w for l gives l = (P − 2w)/2. Substituting P = 60 and w = 8: l = (60 − 16)/2 = 44/2 = 22 m. Answering 30 m comes from ignoring the width altogether and working out l = P/2, which only holds when w = 0. Answering 38 m comes from adding 2w instead of subtracting it: (60 + 16)/2 = 38. Answering 11 m comes from dividing by 4 instead of 2, as if the formula were P = 4l + 4w. The pen's length is 22 m.
- (a) (n − 5)/2 — Method: do the subtraction first, keep it together as a single bracket, then divide that whole bracket by 2. Working: 'subtract 5 from n' is (n − 5); 'divide the result by 2' means the whole bracket goes over 2, giving (n − 5)/2. Answer: (n − 5)/2. n/2 − 5 comes from dividing n by 2 first and only then subtracting 5, the wrong order. 2(n − 5) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. (5 − n)/2 comes from subtracting n from 5 instead of subtracting 5 from n, the wrong way round.
- (b) −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 — Factorise x² − 2x − 8 = (x − 4)(x + 2), giving roots x = 4 and x = −2. Since the coefficient of x² is positive and the inequality is ≤ 0, the solution is the closed interval between the roots, −2 ≤ x ≤ 4, with the roots included because the inequality is not strict. The integers in this interval are −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Distractor routes: −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 drops both endpoints, treating ≤ as if it were the strict inequality <. −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 5)(x + 2), giving an upper root of 5 instead of 4. −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 4)(x + 3), giving a lower root of −3 instead of −2.
- (d) 6th term — The terms are aₙ = 3 × (√3)ⁿ⁻¹: a₁ = 3, a₂ = 3√3 ≈ 5.196, a₃ = 9, a₄ = 9√3 ≈ 15.588, a₅ = 27, a₆ = 27√3 ≈ 46.765. Since a₅ = 27 is still below 30 and a₆ ≈ 46.8 is above 30, the 6th term is the first to exceed 30. 4th term comes from treating the common ratio as 3 instead of √3: 3, 9, 27, 81, … — under that wrong ratio, 81, the 4th term, is the first over 30. 5th term comes from misjudging a₅ = 27 as already greater than 30. 7th term comes from tracking only the whole-number terms (3, 9, 27, 81, …) and reporting the ORIGINAL position of 81 in the full sequence — 81 is indeed a₇, but a₆ ≈ 46.8 already exceeds 30 first.
- (a) 19 — Each time x increases by 1, y increases by 3 (4, 7, 10, 13 — a constant difference of 3). So at x = 4, y = 13 + 3 = 16, and at x = 5, y = 16 + 3 = 19. A candidate who stops one step early, giving the value for x = 4 instead of x = 5, answers 16. A candidate who overcounts and adds three steps of 3 instead of two from x = 3 gets 13 + 9 = 22. A candidate who mistakes the y-intercept (4) for the common difference and adds 4 twice from x = 3 gets 13 + 8 = 21.
- (c) 72 m — The first section is a triangle with base 4 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 4 × 8 = 16 m. The middle section is a rectangle with base 6 s and height 8 m/s, area = 6 × 8 = 48 m. The final section is a triangle with base 2 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 2 × 8 = 8 m. Total distance = 16 + 48 + 8 = 72 m. Treating both sloping sections as full rectangles instead of triangles — forgetting the factor of a half — gives 4 × 8 + 6 × 8 + 2 × 8 = 96 m, which is wrong because a sloping speed-time section is a triangle, not a rectangle. Leaving out the final, decreasing section entirely gives 16 + 48 = 64 m, which is wrong because the cyclist is still moving and covering distance while slowing down. Leaving out the middle, constant-speed section gives 16 + 8 = 24 m, which is wrong because the cyclist covers the most distance of all during the 6 seconds of constant speed.
- (a) x > 4 — Subtract 2x from both sides: 3x − 3 > 9. Add 3 to both sides: 3x > 12. Divide both sides by 3: x > 4. A candidate who subtracts 3 from 9 instead of adding gets 3x > 6, so x > 2. A candidate who divides correctly but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative) gets x < 4. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing gets x > 36.
- (d) line 2 — Line 1 correctly represents three consecutive integers using n. Line 2 adds them: n + (n + 1) + (n + 2). Collecting terms: the n-terms give 3n, and the constants give 1 + 2 = 3, so the correct sum is 3n + 3, not 3n + 2 as Line 2 states — this is the first error, an arithmetic slip in collecting the constant terms. Lines 3 and 4 both follow correctly from Line 2's incorrect result, but that result itself is wrong: the true sum, 3n + 3 = 3(n + 1), is a multiple of 3 for every whole number n. Check the working of each line against what came before it, in order, rather than judging whether the final conclusion feels right — an error that flips the conclusion can sit several lines before the line that states it.
- (b) $y = x^3 - 4x$ — Method: count how many times the curve crosses the x-axis and check whether it is a cubic (an S-shape with up to three crossing points) rather than a lower power, and note which way it runs overall from bottom-left to top-right or the reverse. Working: the curve crosses the x-axis at three points, x = −2, 0 and 2, and runs from bottom-left to top-right, which matches y = x³ − 4x = x(x − 2)(x + 2). Answer: y = x³ − 4x. Distractor refutation: y = −x³ + 4x comes from a sign error on every term, which would flip the curve so it ran from top-left to bottom-right instead. y = x³ + 4x comes from a sign error on the x term only, which removes two of the three crossing points, since x(x² + 4) has only x = 0 as a real root. y = x² − 4x comes from dropping the cubic term altogether, giving a parabola with only two crossing points instead of an S-shaped curve with three.
- (d) The roots of x² − 6x + 5 = 0 are x = 1 and x = 5 (since it factorises to (x − 1)(x − 5)), so by symmetry the turning point has x-coordinate 3, not 6. — Factorising, x² − 6x + 5 = (x − 1)(x − 5), so the roots are x = 1 and x = 5. The turning point lies midway between the roots by symmetry: (1 + 5) ÷ 2 = 3. The coefficient of x has no direct role in locating the turning point this way. The option giving −6 makes an arbitrary sign change with no mathematical basis. The option giving 5 wrongly takes just one of the two roots instead of their midpoint.
- (d) 28 cm — Method: rate = 12 cm ÷ 3 min = 4 cm per minute. Depth after 7 minutes = 4 × 7 = 28 cm. Distractor origins: 84 cm multiplies the given depth by 7 directly, without first finding the rate per minute (12 × 7 = 84); 24 cm simply doubles the given depth instead of scaling correctly by the ratio of times; 16 cm combines the numbers with subtraction and addition (12 − 3 + 7 = 16) instead of finding a rate.
- (a) (−6, −3) — Reflecting in the y-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate and keeps the y-coordinate the same: (−6, −3). (6, 3) comes from reflecting in the x-axis instead, which changes the sign of the y-coordinate. (−6, 3) comes from reflecting in both axes. (6, −3) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (d) x = 5y + 4 — To make x the subject of y = (x − 4)/5, first multiply both sides by 5 to clear the fraction: 5y = x − 4, then add 4 to both sides: x = 5y + 4. Writing x = 5y − 4 multiplies correctly but keeps the minus sign on the 4 instead of changing it to a plus when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 + 4 divides by 5 instead of multiplying, the wrong inverse of the fraction. Writing x = 5(y + 4) adds 4 before multiplying by 5, reversing the correct order of the two steps. The correct rearrangement is x = 5y + 4.
- (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
- (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.