Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 2n² − n − 2 — First differences: 5, 9, 13, 17. Second differences: 4, 4, 4, so a = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Subtracting 2n² (2, 8, 18, 32, 50) from the terms (−1, 4, 13, 26, 43) leaves −3, −4, −5, −6, −7, which is the linear expression −n − 2. So the nth term is 2n² − n − 2. Using the second difference itself as a, without halving it, gives 4n² − n − 2. Finding a = 2 correctly but dropping the linear remainder −n − 2 entirely leaves 2n². Treating the first first difference (5) as a common difference and building a + (n − 1)d = −1 + 5(n − 1) gives 5n − 6, which only matches the first two terms.
- (d) y = −f(x + 2) has a maximum turning point at (1, 5). — y = f(x + 2) translates the graph 2 units in the negative x-direction, so the turning point's x-coordinate moves from 3 to 1; reflecting in the x-axis then negates the y-coordinate, turning −5 into 5, and also turns a minimum into a maximum — giving a true maximum turning point at (1, 5). Translating the root at x = 1 in the wrong direction, adding 2 instead of subtracting it, gives x = 3, but the true image root is at 1 − 2 = −1, so that statement is false. Keeping the coordinates (1, 5) correct but forgetting that reflecting in the x-axis turns a minimum into a maximum gives a false "minimum turning point" statement. Getting the reflection's effect on the turning-point type right (a maximum) but translating the x-coordinate in the wrong direction, using 3 + 2 = 5 instead of 3 − 2 = 1, gives a false statement at (5, 5).
- (d) 5 — Method: rearrange the formula to make m the subject, then substitute F = 15.50. Working: F = 3 + 2.5m, so subtracting 3 from both sides gives F − 3 = 2.5m, then dividing by 2.5 gives m = (F − 3) / 2.5. Substituting F = 15.50: m = (15.50 − 3) / 2.5 = 12.50 / 2.5 = 5. The value 6.2 comes from dividing 15.50 by 2.5 without subtracting the fixed £3 first. The value 3.2 comes from dividing first and subtracting afterwards, in the wrong order: (15.50 / 2.5) − 3 = 3.2. The value 7.4 comes from adding £3 instead of subtracting it before dividing: (15.50 + 3) / 2.5 = 7.4.
- (b) £14 — Method: read the fixed charge (the cost at 0 miles) and the rate (the cost per extra mile) from the graph, then use them to work out the cost for a distance beyond the part that is plotted. Working: the graph shows a fixed charge of £2 at 0 miles, and the cost rises by £2 for every extra mile, so for 6 miles the cost is £2 + (£2 × 6) = £2 + £12 = £14. Answer: £14. Distractor refutation: £12 comes from multiplying the rate by the distance and leaving out the £2 fixed charge. £8 comes from misreading the rate as £1 per mile instead of £2 per mile. £24 comes from adding the fixed charge to the rate first and then multiplying the total by the distance, instead of multiplying the rate by the distance and then adding the fixed charge.
- (d) x = 6 — Method: with an unknown on both sides, first collect the x terms on one side by subtracting the smaller x term from both sides, then deal with the numbers. Working: subtracting x from both sides gives x + 7 = 13, and subtracting 7 from both sides gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 20 comes from adding 7 to 13 instead of subtracting it once the x terms have been collected; x = 2 comes from collecting the x terms by adding them, giving 3x + 7 = 13 and then 3x = 6; x = −6 comes from subtracting 2x from both sides to get 7 = −x + 13, reaching −6 = −x and then copying the sign straight across instead of dividing by −1.
- (a) False — 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, not 8x − 3. — Expand the bracket by multiplying both terms by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, which is not 8x − 3 — the student is wrong. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 3 comes from multiplying only the 2x by 4 and copying the −3 across unchanged. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 2x − 12 comes from multiplying only the −3 by 4 and leaving 2x unmultiplied. Claiming it is true because both expressions are linear ignores that equivalence depends on the actual coefficients, not the type of expression.
- (a) −10 — Method: multiply each bracket out, treating the second bracket as being multiplied by −3 because it is subtracted, then collect like terms. Working: 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4 and −3(x + 2) = −3x − 6, so the expression becomes 8x − 4 − 3x − 6 − 5x; the x terms give 8x − 3x − 5x = 0, so no term in x survives, and the numbers give −4 − 6 = −10. Answer: −10. The distractors: 2 comes from expanding −3(x + 2) as −3x + 6, leaving the numbers −4 + 6; 5x − 10 comes from forgetting the final −5x, so the x terms give 8x − 3x = 5x; −7 comes from multiplying the 4 over only the first term of its bracket, giving 8x − 1 and so the numbers −1 − 6.
- (d) 8(7x − 3) — Method: find the highest common factor of the two terms, write it in front of a bracket and divide each term by it. Working: 56 = 8 × 7 and 24 = 8 × 3, so the highest common factor is 8; dividing gives 56x ÷ 8 = 7x and 24 ÷ 8 = 3, and the subtraction sign stays between them. Answer: 8(7x − 3), which multiplies back out to 56x − 24. The distractors: 8(7x + 3) comes from dropping the minus sign of −24 while dividing; 8(56x − 3) comes from dividing only the number term by 8 and leaving 56x untouched inside the bracket; 8(7x − 16) comes from subtracting 8 from 24 instead of dividing 24 by 8.
- (d) x = 0, y = −1 and x = 3, y = 5 — Set the two expressions for y equal: 2x − 1 = x² − x − 1. Rearranging, subtracting 2x and adding 1 to both sides: 0 = x² − x − 1 − 2x + 1 = x² − 3x, so x² − 3x = 0. Factorise: x(x − 3) = 0, giving x = 0 or x = 3. Using y = 2x − 1: x = 0 gives y = −1; x = 3 gives y = 5. Distractor routes: x = 0, y = −1 alone stops after the factor x = 0 and never checks the second factor, x − 3 = 0. x = 0, y = −1 and x = −3, y = −7 comes from mis-factorising x² − 3x as x(x + 3), a sign error that gives a second root of −3 instead of 3. x = −2, y = −5 and x = 1, y = 1 comes from adding 2x to both sides instead of subtracting it when rearranging, giving x² + x − 2 = 0 instead of x² − 3x = 0.
- (a) y = (1/4)x + 1/4 — Rearrange 4x + y = 12 to y = −4x + 12, so the path has gradient −4. The perpendicular gradient is 1/4. Substituting (3, 1) into y − 1 = (1/4)(x − 3): y = (1/4)x − 3/4 + 1 = (1/4)x + 1/4. Distractor routes: y = −4x + 13 uses the path's own gradient, −4, instead of the perpendicular gradient, giving a line PARALLEL to the path through (3, 1) rather than perpendicular to it. y = (1/4)x − 1/4 makes an arithmetic slip combining −3/4 and 1, landing on −1/4 instead of the correct 1/4. y = −(1/4)x + 1/4 takes the reciprocal of −4, which is −1/4, but forgets to change its sign, so it is not the true negative reciprocal.
- (c) No — that moment has already passed — Method: call the number of years from now x, add x to both ages, form the equation from the comparison and then interpret the value of x that comes out. Working: in x years Harry will be 14 + x and Mia will be 8 + x, so 14 + x = 2(8 + x); expanding gives 14 + x = 16 + 2x, and subtracting x and 16 from both sides gives x = −2. A negative value of x places the moment two years in the past, when Harry was 12 and Mia was 6 and 12 = 2 × 6, so it is not something still to come. Answer: no — that moment has already passed. The distractors: the claim that it has never happened and never will comes from reaching x = −2 and reading a negative number of years as no solution at all, when x = −2 does not say that no such moment exists but says where it is — two years before now; the claim that it happens when Harry is 16 comes from doubling Mia's present age, 2 × 8 = 16, and reading that as the age Harry has to reach; the claim that it happens when Harry is 20 comes from expanding 2(8 + x) as 8 + 2x, doubling only the x, which gives x = 6.
- (a) 55 − 5n — The number of chairs decreases by 5 in each row after the first, so the common difference is d=−5, and the first term is a=50. The nth term is a+(n−1)d = 50+(n−1)(−5) = 50−5n+5 = 55−5n. A candidate who uses the common difference as the constant term instead of correctly finding 55, giving the constant as −5 instead, would write −5n−5. A candidate who uses the first term, 50, as the coefficient of n instead of the common difference, would write 50n−5. A candidate who does not multiply the common difference by n at all, treating the nth term as n+d instead of dn+c, would write n−5.
- (c) 22 m — Rearranging P = 2l + 2w for l gives l = (P − 2w)/2. Substituting P = 60 and w = 8: l = (60 − 16)/2 = 44/2 = 22 m. Answering 30 m comes from ignoring the width altogether and working out l = P/2, which only holds when w = 0. Answering 38 m comes from adding 2w instead of subtracting it: (60 + 16)/2 = 38. Answering 11 m comes from dividing by 4 instead of 2, as if the formula were P = 4l + 4w. The pen's length is 22 m.
- (c) 90° — The graph of y = tan x has a vertical asymptote at x = 90°, the smallest positive value for which it is undefined. tan 0° = 0, a defined value, not an undefined one — confusing where the graph equals zero with where it is undefined gives 0°. x = 270° is also a value where y = tan x is undefined, but it is not the smallest positive one, since 90° comes first. tan 45° = 1, a defined value — confusing the asymptote with the angle at which tan x = 1 gives 45°.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.