Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 2√2 — The radius satisfies r² = 8, so r = √8 = √(4 × 2) = √4 × √2 = 2√2. Choosing 8 forgets to take the square root of r² at all. Choosing 4 comes from halving 8 instead of finding its square root. Choosing √2 splits off the factor of 4 correctly but forgets to multiply the 2 back in front of the root.
- (a) −3/4 — Method: the tangent at a point on a circle is perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point, so find the gradient of the radius and then take its negative reciprocal. Working: the radius joins (0, 0) to (6, 8), so its gradient is 8 ÷ 6, which cancels to 4/3. Turning 4/3 upside down gives 3/4, and changing the sign gives −3/4. Answer: the gradient of the tangent is −3/4. The distractors: 4/3 is the gradient of the radius itself, quoted without taking the perpendicular at all; −4/3 changes the sign but leaves the fraction the same way up, so the two gradients do not multiply to give −1; 3/4 turns the fraction upside down but keeps it positive, which is the other half of the same rule left undone.
- (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
- (c) (2n + 1)² + (2n + 3)² = (4n² + 4n + 1) + (4n² + 12n + 9) = 8n² + 16n + 10 = 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2, and n² + 2n + 1 is an integer, so the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. — Expand each square carefully: (2n + 1)² = 4n² + 4n + 1 and (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 12n + 9, since the cross term is 2 × 2n × 3 = 12n. Adding gives 8n² + 16n + 10, and factorising out 8 from every term that can hold one gives 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2; since n² + 2n + 1 is always an integer, the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. The attempt reaching 8(n² + 2n) + 10 has the correct expansion but stops the factorisation one step early — it never pulls a further 8 out of the 10 (10 = 8 + 2), so 'always 10 more than a multiple of 8' should be reduced to 'always 2 more than a multiple of 8'. The attempt reaching 2(4n² + 8n + 5) also has the correct expansion, and the factorisation is true, but 'always even' only shows the sum is a multiple of 2 — being even is necessary but nowhere near sufficient to be a multiple of 8, and the argument never finds the extra factor of 4. The fourth attempt makes an expansion slip, using (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 9 instead of 4n² + 12n + 9 — dropping the 12n cross term entirely — so it works from the wrong expression 8n² + 4n + 10 throughout, and no amount of correct working afterwards can recover the right conclusion.
- (b) 25 — Substitute n = 7: 4 × 7 − 3 = 28 − 3 = 25. Forgetting to subtract 3 gives 4 × 7 = 28. Subtracting 3 from 7 before multiplying by 4, 4 × (7 − 3) = 16, applies the operations in the wrong order. Substituting n = 8 by miscounting the position gives 4 × 8 − 3 = 29.
- (d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
- (b) 5 and −6 — Method: turn the sentence into an equation in one letter, collect every term on one side so it reads as a quadratic equal to zero, then factorise. Working: if the number is x then x² + x = 30, which rearranges to x² + x − 30 = 0; two numbers that multiply to −30 and add to 1 are 6 and −5, so (x + 6)(x − 5) = 0 and x = −6 or x = 5. Both values work: 5 + 25 = 30 and −6 + 36 = 30. Answer: 5 and −6. The distractors: 6 and −5 comes from reading the numbers inside the brackets as the solutions without changing their signs; 5 only comes from discarding the negative solution, although nothing in the question rules out a negative number; 5 and 6 comes from hunting for a factor pair of 30 instead of forming and solving the quadratic.
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (a) It has a solution between x = 2.6 and x = 2.7 — f(2.6) is negative and f(2.7) is positive, so the graph of f crosses the x-axis between x = 2.6 and x = 2.7, meaning the equation has a solution there. Choosing 'x = 2.6 is a solution' reads an end of the interval as the root itself, but f(2.6) = −1.424, which is not zero — the change of sign locates a root between the two values, it does not land on either of them. Choosing 'between x = −2.6 and x = −2.7' confuses the negative f-VALUE at 2.6 with a negative x-value. Choosing 'no root in this interval' misapplies the rule, which needs a CHANGE of sign — and a change of sign is exactly what these two values show.
- (b) It is not even an ordinary equation with a solution: expanding the left-hand side gives 3x − 12, and 3x − 12 = 3x − 4 would require −12 = −4, which is never true. — Expanding the left-hand side, 3(x − 4) = 3x − 12. Setting this equal to the right-hand side, 3x − 12 = 3x − 4, gives −12 = −4 once the 3x terms are removed from both sides — a statement that is never true, so no value of x satisfies the equation at all, and it is certainly not an identity. The option about substituting a specific value misunderstands algebraic expansion, which holds for every x, not one chosen value. The option matching the first term wrongly assumes that is enough to prove equivalence. The option about multiplying the 4 by 3 on both sides is nonsensical, since there is only one bracket to expand, on the left-hand side.
- (a) 12 — Method: write both ages as they were six years ago, call Leo's present age x, and form an equation from the comparison at that time. Working: six years ago Harry was 24 − 6 = 18 and Leo was x − 6, so 18 = 3(x − 6); expanding gives 18 = 3x − 18, adding 18 to both sides gives 36 = 3x, and dividing by 3 gives x = 12. Checking: six years ago Harry was 18 and Leo was 6, and 18 = 3 × 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 6 comes from solving 18 = 3(x − 6) as far as Leo's age six years ago, 18 ÷ 3 = 6, and giving that as his age now; 8 comes from dividing Harry's present age by 3, 24 ÷ 3 = 8, using the multiple at the wrong moment in time; 36 comes from stopping at 3x = 36 and giving 36 as Leo's age.
- (c) 4(n + 3) — 'Add 3 to n' must happen before 'multiply the result by 4', so the addition needs brackets to show it happens first: 4(n + 3). Writing 4n + 3 multiplies n by 4 immediately and only adds the 3 afterwards, which reverses the order the words describe. Writing n + 3 × 4 only multiplies the 3 by 4, and adds n as a separate, unmultiplied term — it treats 'the result' as just the 3, not the whole of n + 3. Writing 3(n + 4) keeps the correct structure but swaps which number is added and which is multiplied. The expression for 'add 3 to n, then multiply the result by 4' is 4(n + 3).
- (b) y = −(1/3)x + 2 — Method: two lines are perpendicular when the product of their gradients is −1, so the gradient of a line perpendicular to one of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1 divided by m. Working: reading m from y = 3x + 1 gives a gradient of 3, so the perpendicular gradient is −1 ÷ 3 = −1/3, and the line carrying that gradient is y = −(1/3)x + 2; the check 3 × (−1/3) = −1 confirms it. Answer: y = −(1/3)x + 2. The distractors: y = 3x − 4 comes from using an equal gradient, which is the test for parallel lines rather than perpendicular ones; y = (1/3)x + 2 comes from turning the gradient upside down but leaving out the change of sign, giving a product of 1 instead of −1; y = −3x + 2 comes from changing the sign of the gradient without turning it upside down, giving a product of −9.
- (a) 16 — A and B share the same y-coordinate, so the distance between them is the horizontal difference between their x-coordinates: 8 − (−8) = 16, giving a chord of length 16. Choosing 8 gives only the x-coordinate of one point, not the full distance between the two points. Choosing 34 is the diameter of the circle (2 × 17), not the length of this particular chord. Choosing 17 is the radius — the distance from the centre to A or to B, not from A to B.
- (d) 7n + 5 — Method: find the rate charged per extra chair, then find the fixed part of the cost that fits hiring 1 chair. Working: the cost rises by £7 for each extra chair (19 − 12 = 7, 26 − 19 = 7, 33 − 26 = 7), so the cost has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 12, so c = 5. Answer: the cost in pounds is 7n + 5. The value 7n comes from ignoring the fixed part of the charge entirely. The value 7n + 12 comes from using the cost of 1 chair as the fixed part directly, without subtracting the per-chair rate first. The value 12n + 7 comes from swapping the roles of the cost of hiring 1 chair, £12, and the rate per extra chair, £7 — using the total for one chair as the coefficient of n and the rate as the fixed part.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.