Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 2n² − n − 2 — First differences: 5, 9, 13, 17. Second differences: 4, 4, 4, so a = 4 ÷ 2 = 2. Subtracting 2n² (2, 8, 18, 32, 50) from the terms (−1, 4, 13, 26, 43) leaves −3, −4, −5, −6, −7, which is the linear expression −n − 2. So the nth term is 2n² − n − 2. Using the second difference itself as a, without halving it, gives 4n² − n − 2. Finding a = 2 correctly but dropping the linear remainder −n − 2 entirely leaves 2n². Treating the first first difference (5) as a common difference and building a + (n − 1)d = −1 + 5(n − 1) gives 5n − 6, which only matches the first two terms.
- (c) P — Sequence P has a common ratio of 2 (4 × 2 = 8, 8 × 2 = 16, 16 × 2 = 32), so it is geometric. Sequence Q has a common difference of 4, which is arithmetic, not geometric — a candidate who confuses a constant difference with a constant ratio picks Q. Sequence R has increasing differences of 3, 5, 7, a quadratic sequence, not geometric — a candidate who assumes any fast-growing sequence must be geometric picks R. Sequence S is the square numbers from 2² onwards (2², 3², 4², 5²), which is also quadratic, not geometric — a candidate who thinks squaring always means geometric growth picks S.
- (c) n = 4 — Testing n = 4: 4² = 16, and 16 + 4 + 1 = 21, and 21 = 3 × 7 is not a prime number, so this value disproves the claim. Testing n = 1: 1² = 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, which is prime, so it does not disprove the claim. Testing n = 2: 2² = 4, and 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, which is prime. Testing n = 3: 3² = 9, and 9 + 3 + 1 = 13, which is also prime — a counterexample has to give a result that isn't prime, and only n = 4 does that.
- (d) Below y = x + 1, below x + y = 5, above y = 0 — For y ≤ x + 1, R lies on or below the line y = x + 1. For x + y ≤ 5 (that is, y ≤ 5 − x), R lies on or below that line too. For y ≥ 0, R lies on or above the x-axis. Combining all three: R is below y = x + 1, below x + y = 5, and above y = 0. Distractor routes: "Above y = x + 1" flips the first inequality, describing the wrong side of that line. "Above x + y = 5" flips the second inequality, describing the wrong side of that line. "Below y = 0" flips the third inequality, describing the wrong side of the x-axis.
- (d) x + y = 7 — The midpoint of AB is (−1 + 5)/2, (2 + 8)/2, which is (2, 5). The gradient of AB is (8 − 2)/(5 − (−1)) = 6/6 = 1. The perpendicular bisector has gradient −1 and passes through (2, 5): y − 5 = −(x − 2), which rearranges to x + y = 7. Distractor routes: x − y = −3 uses the gradient of AB itself, 1, rather than its negative reciprocal, giving a line PARALLEL to AB through the midpoint instead of perpendicular to it. x + y = 12 comes from adding the y-coordinates, 2 + 8 = 10, but forgetting to divide by 2, using the midpoint (2, 10) instead of (2, 5). x + y = 4 comes from using A's x-coordinate, −1, directly instead of averaging it with B's, giving the point (−1, 5) instead of the true midpoint (2, 5).
- (c) 16 km/h — Method: total distance = 12 + 8 = 20 km. Total time = 30 + 30 + 15 = 75 minutes = 1.25 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 20 ÷ 1.25 = 16 km/h. Distractor origins: 20 km/h gives the total distance without ever dividing by the total time; 24 km/h uses only the speed of the first stage (12 km in 30 minutes), ignoring the second stage and the rest; 28 km/h averages the two separate stage speeds, 24 km/h and 32 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time.
- (d) 28 — The height decreases by 8 cm at each bounce after the first, so the nth bounce reaches 60−(n−1)×8 cm. For the 5th bounce: 60−4×8=60−32=28. A candidate who subtracts 8 one time too many, five times instead of four, would compute 60−5×8=20. A candidate who adds the decrease instead of subtracting it, a sign error, would compute 60+4×8=92. A candidate who works out only the total decrease and forgets to include the starting height of 60 cm would compute just 5×8=40.
- (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
- (b) $y = x^3 - 4x$ — Method: count how many times the curve crosses the x-axis and check whether it is a cubic (an S-shape with up to three crossing points) rather than a lower power, and note which way it runs overall from bottom-left to top-right or the reverse. Working: the curve crosses the x-axis at three points, x = −2, 0 and 2, and runs from bottom-left to top-right, which matches y = x³ − 4x = x(x − 2)(x + 2). Answer: y = x³ − 4x. Distractor refutation: y = −x³ + 4x comes from a sign error on every term, which would flip the curve so it ran from top-left to bottom-right instead. y = x³ + 4x comes from a sign error on the x term only, which removes two of the three crossing points, since x(x² + 4) has only x = 0 as a real root. y = x² − 4x comes from dropping the cubic term altogether, giving a parabola with only two crossing points instead of an S-shaped curve with three.
- (c) 7 — To reverse the rule, subtract the constant then divide by the coefficient: 30−2=28, then 28÷4=7, so n=7. A candidate who adds the constant instead of subtracting it, a sign error when rearranging, would compute (30+2)÷4=32÷4=8. A candidate who subtracts the constant correctly but then forgets to divide by the coefficient would stop at 30−2=28. A candidate who treats 4n+2 as a single term 6n, adding the coefficient and constant together, would compute 30÷6=5.
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
- (d) 16 boys and 14 girls — Method: write the number of boys in terms of the number of girls, then use the total for the class. Working: if there are g girls then there are g + 2 boys, so g + (g + 2) = 30, that is 2g + 2 = 30, so 2g = 28 and g = 14; the number of boys is 14 + 2 = 16. Answer: 16 boys and 14 girls, which total 30 and differ by 2. The distractors: 14 boys and 16 girls comes from substituting for the wrong group, writing b + (b + 2) = 30 and then calling b the number of boys; 15 boys and 15 girls comes from halving 30 and never using the difference; 17 boys and 13 girls comes from adding the whole 2 to one half of the class and taking the whole 2 off the other half, which leaves a difference of 4.
- (d) x > 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other, then divide by the coefficient of x; dividing by a positive number leaves the sign as it is. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 4x + 1 > 2x + 9 gives 2x + 1 > 9; subtracting 1 from both sides gives 2x > 8; dividing both sides by 2 gives x > 4. Answer: x > 4. The distractors: x < 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 2; x > 5 comes from adding the 1 to the 9 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x > 10; x < 5 comes from making both of those mistakes together.
- (a) 4 — a₅ = a₄ + a₃, so a₄ = a₅ − a₃ = 29 − 11 = 18. a₄ = a₃ + a₂, so a₂ = a₄ − a₃ = 18 − 11 = 7. a₃ = a₂ + a₁, so a₁ = a₃ − a₂ = 11 − 7 = 4. Checking forwards: 4, 7, 11, 18, 29. Answering 7 stops one step early, reporting a₂ = 7 instead of continuing back one more step to a₁ — wrong, because the question asks for a₁, not a₂. Answering 18 reports a₄ = 18, an intermediate value found along the way, instead of a₁ — wrong, because a₄ is a term used to reach the answer, not the term the question asks for. Answering 3 takes one backward step too many, working out a further term a₀ = a₂ − a₁ = 7 − 4 = 3 — wrong, because the sequence starts at a₁, so a₁ = 4 is as far back as the question goes.
- (a) Outside: OQ² = 221 > r² = 169 — OQ² = 10² + 11² = 100 + 121 = 221. Comparing this with r² = 169: since 221 > 169, OQ > r, so Q lies outside the circle — this is the correct verdict AND the correct working. 'Outside: OQ = 21 (10 + 11) > r = 13' reaches the same Outside verdict, but by invalid working: it adds the coordinates instead of squaring them (10 + 11 = 21, rather than 10² + 11² = 221), so the stated 'OQ' of 21 is not a distance at all — the verdict happens to match, but the method is wrong. 'Inside: OQ ≈ 14.87 < r² = 169' correctly finds the distance OQ = √221 ≈ 14.87, but then compares that DISTANCE with r² = 169 instead of with r = 13 — comparing two different kinds of quantity gives a meaningless, and here wrong, verdict. 'Inside: OQ² = 221 < (2r)² = 676' confuses the radius with the diameter: it compares OQ² with the diameter squared, (2 × 13)² = 676, instead of with r² = 169.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.