Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) Yes: the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. — Method: find the 8th term by subtracting 8 a total of 7 times from the first term, since the 1st term itself needs 0 subtractions. Working: 8th term = 50 − 8 × 7 = 50 − 56 = −6, which is negative, so Priya is correct. Answer: Yes, the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. The "50 − 8 × 6 = 2" option subtracts 8 only six times instead of seven, an off-by-one error in counting the steps. The "50 − 8 × 8 = −14" option subtracts 8 eight times instead of seven, the opposite off-by-one error. The claim that repeated subtraction "can never go negative" ignores that subtracting enough times from any starting value eventually gives a negative result.
- (c) 37.5 — The tangent at (18, 24) is 18x + 24y = 900 (using ax + by = r² with a = 18, b = 24, r² = 900). Setting x = 0 to find the y-intercept: 24y = 900, so y = 37.5. Choosing 900 skips the division by 24 and just repeats the constant. Choosing 50 divides the constant by the x-coefficient 18 instead of the y-coefficient 24. Choosing 1.25 uses the radius 30 instead of r² = 900 as the constant before dividing.
- (d) −11/60 — The radius from the origin to (11, 60) has gradient 60/11. The tangent is perpendicular to this radius, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal: −1 ÷ (60/11) = −11/60. Choosing 60/11 uses the radius's gradient unchanged, without applying perpendicularity. Choosing −60/11 negates the radius's gradient but forgets to take its reciprocal. Choosing 11/60 takes the reciprocal correctly but keeps the gradient positive instead of negative.
- (d) 30° and 150° — The first solution is x = 30°, since sin 30° = 0.5. The graph of y = sin x is symmetrical about x = 90° between 0° and 180°, so the second solution is 180° − 30° = 150°. Adding 180° to the first solution instead of subtracting it from 180° gives 30° and 210°, but sin 210° = −0.5, not 0.5. Reflecting the first solution about x = 90° by adding 30° to 90° instead of subtracting from 180° gives 30° and 120°, but sin 120° = √3/2, not 0.5. Misremembering the standard value and using sin 45° = 0.5 instead of sin 30° = 0.5 gives 45° and 135°, but sin 45° = √2/2, not 0.5.
- (d) 6 — Method: collect the x-terms on one side and the constants on the other, then divide by the remaining coefficient of x. Working: 6x − 3x = 13 + 5, so 3x = 18, x = 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Answer: x = 6. 2.67 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 13 − 5 = 8, x = 8 ÷ 3 ≈ 2.67. 2 comes from a sign error when moving the x-term, adding instead of subtracting: 9x = 18, x = 2. 18 comes from correctly finding 3x = 18 but forgetting to divide by 3.
- (c) 25 — Method: read off a, b and c with their signs and substitute them into b² − 4ac. Working: for 2x² + 3x − 2 = 0, a = 2, b = 3 and c = −2, so b² − 4ac = 3² − 4 × 2 × (−2) = 9 − (−16) = 9 + 16 = 25. Answer: 25. The distractors: −7 comes from taking c as +2, which gives 9 − 16; 22 comes from working b² as 2 × 3 = 6 and then 6 + 16; 13 comes from leaving the 4 out of 4ac and working 9 − 2 × (−2).
- (a) x = 2, x = 7; y-intercept cannot be found here — Translating y = f(x) to y = f(x − 3) shifts the graph 3 units to the right, so each root increases by 3: x = −1 becomes x = 2, and x = 4 becomes x = 7. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0, which for this new graph is f(0 − 3) = f(−3) — and f(−3) is not one of the values given, so the new y-intercept cannot be worked out from the information given. Writing 'y-intercept stays at (0, −8)' wrongly assumes a horizontal translation leaves the y-intercept unchanged — it generally does not, since it moves the whole graph sideways, including the point that used to sit on the y-axis. Writing roots at x = −4 and x = 1 comes from translating 3 units to the LEFT instead of to the right — f(x − 3) shifts the graph in the positive x-direction, not the negative direction.
- (d) Below y = x + 1, below x + y = 5, above y = 0 — For y ≤ x + 1, R lies on or below the line y = x + 1. For x + y ≤ 5 (that is, y ≤ 5 − x), R lies on or below that line too. For y ≥ 0, R lies on or above the x-axis. Combining all three: R is below y = x + 1, below x + y = 5, and above y = 0. Distractor routes: "Above y = x + 1" flips the first inequality, describing the wrong side of that line. "Above x + y = 5" flips the second inequality, describing the wrong side of that line. "Below y = 0" flips the third inequality, describing the wrong side of the x-axis.
- (b) 3/2 — Rearrange 2x + 3y = 6 into y = mx + c: 3y = −2x + 6, so y = −(2/3)x + 2. The gradient of this line is −2/3. The perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal: 3/2. Distractor routes: −1/2 comes from reading the gradient straight off the x-coefficient, 2, without dividing by the y-coefficient, 3, first, then taking its negative reciprocal. −3/2 correctly finds the gradient −2/3 but only takes its reciprocal without also changing the sign, giving −3/2 instead of 3/2. 2/3 comes from negating the gradient −2/3 to 2/3, but forgetting to also take the reciprocal.
- (c) (3, 9) — Reflecting in the horizontal line y = 2 keeps the x-coordinate the same and maps y to 2 × 2 − y = 4 − (−5) = 9, so S = (3, 9). A candidate who uses k − y instead of 2k − y gets 2 − (−5) = 7, giving (3, 7). A candidate who reflects in the x-axis instead of the line y = 2, simply changing the sign of y, gets (3, 5). A candidate who also changes the sign of the x-coordinate, as if reflecting in both axes, gets (−3, 9).
- (a) 130 — Method: substitute the total bill into the formula, then subtract the fixed charge and divide by the cost per text message. Working: 24.50 = 18 + 0.05t, so 0.05t = 24.50 − 18 = 6.50, t = 6.50 ÷ 0.05 = 130. Answer: 130 extra text messages. 490 comes from dividing the whole bill by 0.05 without first subtracting the £18 fixed charge: 24.50 ÷ 0.05 = 490. 13 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.5 instead of 0.05, moving the decimal point one place too far: 6.50 ÷ 0.5 = 13. 65 comes from dividing the £6.50 by 0.1 instead of 0.05.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (b) a = 7; turning point (4, 2) — A vertical translation y = f(x) + a moves every point on the graph up or down by a, so the x-coordinate of the turning point stays at 4 and the minimum value becomes −5 + a. Setting −5 + a = 2 and solving gives a = 7, so the new turning point is (4, 2). Rearranging −5 + a = 2 with a sign error, treating it as a = −5 − 2, gives a = −7 while still landing on the correct turning-point coordinates. Correctly finding a = 7 but then writing down the original turning point instead of the shifted one gives (4, −5). Assuming a is simply equal to the new minimum value itself, ignoring the original −5 entirely, gives a = 2.
- (b) 2n + 3 — Method: multiply the cost per mile by the number of miles to get an expression, then add the fixed fee as a separate term. Working: n miles at £2 each is 2n; add the £3 fixed fee: 2n + 3. Answer: 2n + 3. 3n + 2 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, treating £3 as the rate per mile and £2 as the fixed fee. 5n comes from adding the fee and the rate together first (3 + 2 = 5) and multiplying the result by n, instead of keeping the fixed fee as its own term. 2n − 3 comes from subtracting the fixed fee instead of adding it.
- (d) 12 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 18 + 4(n − 1), set it equal to 62, and solve for n. Working: 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, so 4(n − 1) = 44, giving n − 1 = 11, so n = 12. Answer: row 12. 11 comes from using 18 + 4n = 62 instead of 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, an off-by-one error, giving n = 11. 48 comes from correctly simplifying to 4n = 48 but stopping there, without dividing by 4 to find n. 15.5 comes from dividing 62 by 4 directly, ignoring the 18 seats already in the front row.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.