Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 3x² + 4x − 7 — Method: the minus sign in front of the second bracket changes the sign of every term inside it; then collect like terms. Working: removing the brackets gives 5x² + 3x − 2 − 2x² + x − 5; the squared terms give 5x² − 2x² = 3x², the x terms give 3x + x = 4x, and the number terms give −2 − 5 = −7. Answer: 3x² + 4x − 7. The distractors: 7x² + 2x + 3 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting, giving 5x² + 2x², 3x − x and −2 + 5; 3x² + 2x + 3 comes from applying the minus sign to 2x² only, leaving −x and +5 unchanged so that 3x − x = 2x and −2 + 5 = 3; 3x² + 4x + 3 comes from changing the signs of the terms with letters but leaving +5 as it stood, so the number terms give −2 + 5 = 3.
- (d) 28 cm — Method: rate = 12 cm ÷ 3 min = 4 cm per minute. Depth after 7 minutes = 4 × 7 = 28 cm. Distractor origins: 84 cm multiplies the given depth by 7 directly, without first finding the rate per minute (12 × 7 = 84); 24 cm simply doubles the given depth instead of scaling correctly by the ratio of times; 16 cm combines the numbers with subtraction and addition (12 − 3 + 7 = 16) instead of finding a rate.
- (d) x = 2 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 2, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 2x + 6 = 10; subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 4; dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 5 comes from dividing both sides by 2 first, reaching x + 3 = 5 and writing 5 without taking the 3 away; x = 8 comes from adding 6 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16; x = 3.5 comes from expanding 2(x + 3) as 2x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 2, which leads to 2x = 7.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
- (c) {x : x ≤ −4} ∪ {x : x ≥ 4} — Rearrange so one side is zero: x² − 16 ≥ 0, then factorise: (x − 4)(x + 4) ≥ 0. The critical values are x = −4 and x = 4. Since the coefficient of x² is positive, the graph is a U-shape that is on or above the x-axis outside its roots, so the solution is x ≤ −4 or x ≥ 4, written as {x : x ≤ −4} ∪ {x : x ≥ 4}. Distractor routes: {x : −4 ≤ x ≤ 4} takes the region BETWEEN the roots, which is where x² − 16 is negative, the opposite region. {x : x ≥ 4} keeps only the positive square root and drops the negative branch entirely. {x : x ≤ 4} comes from a sign error, treating the inequality as if it were x² ≤ 16.
- (a) 8 — f(x − 1) means every input to f is reduced by 1 before it is looked up. At x = 2, the input to f becomes 2 − 1 = 1, so f(x − 1) at x = 2 is f(1) = 8. Reading f(2) = 4 directly from the table, without applying the shift, gives 4. Shifting in the wrong direction, using x + 1 = 3 instead of x − 1 = 1, gives f(3) = 1. Confusing f(x − 1) with f(x) − 1 — taking f(2) = 4 and then subtracting 1 — gives 3.
- (b) 40 — The differences between consecutive terms are 3, 5, 7, 9, increasing by 2 each time, so the next difference is 11, giving 29 + 11 = 40. A candidate who reuses the last difference of 9 without increasing it gets 29 + 9 = 38. A candidate who increases the difference by only 1 instead of 2 gets 29 + 10 = 39. A candidate who reuses the first difference of 3 instead of the pattern gets 29 + 3 = 32.
- (d) An inequality, because ≤ compares the two sides — The symbol ≤ means 'is less than or equal to', so the statement compares the sizes of the two sides instead of saying they are equal: that makes it an inequality. Solving it gives n ≤ 5, a whole range of values rather than the single value an equation would give. An identity has to be true for every value of the letter, and this fails at n = 6, so it is not one. A formula works one quantity out from another, and there is only one letter here.
- (b) 20 — a²b means a² multiplied by b: a² = 2² = 4, and 4 × 5 = 20. Reading the expression as (ab)² instead of a²b gives (2 × 5)² = 100. Squaring b instead of a, 2 × 5² = 50, squares the wrong letter. Adding a² and b instead of multiplying them, 2² + 5 = 9, uses the wrong operation.
- (b) 8 — Method: a circle centred on the origin has equation x² + y² = r², where r is the radius, so the number on the right-hand side is the square of the radius and not the radius itself. Working: comparing x² + y² = 64 with x² + y² = r² gives r² = 64, so r = √64 = 8. Answer: the radius is 8. The distractors: 64 is r² read straight off the equation as though the right-hand side were the radius, which is the commonest error on this form; 32 comes from halving 64, treating the right-hand side as a diameter that has to be halved; 16 is the diameter, 2 × 8, quoted in place of the radius.
- (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.
- (b) the first and the third — Method: the sign of a product depends only on the signs of the two numbers multiplied: like signs give a positive product and unlike signs a negative one, so look for the quadrants in which both coordinates carry the same sign. Working: in the first quadrant x and y are both positive, and positive times positive is positive; in the third quadrant both are negative, and negative times negative is positive as well; in the second quadrant x is negative while y is positive, and in the fourth x is positive while y is negative, so each of those gives a negative product. Answer: the first and the third. The distractors: 'the second and the fourth' comes from applying the rule for a NEGATIVE product, unlike signs, to a positive one; 'the first and the second' comes from testing only the y-coordinate and keeping the quadrants where the height is positive; 'the first and the fourth' comes from testing only the x-coordinate in the same way.
- (a) Yes — the gradients multiply to −2 × 1/2 = −1. — Rearrange Q into the form y = mx + c: 2y = x + 6 gives y = (1/2)x + 3, so Q has gradient 1/2. P has gradient −2. Two lines are perpendicular exactly when the product of their gradients is −1: −2 × 1/2 = −1. Since this holds, P and Q are perpendicular. Distractor routes: "the product is −1, but perpendicular needs 1" works out the product correctly but misremembers the condition — the perpendicular test is a product of exactly −1, and parallel lines are spotted by their gradients being equal, not by a product of 1. "Q's gradient is 2, and −2 × 2 = −4" comes from reading the 2 in front of y in 2y = x + 6 as the gradient, instead of dividing the whole equation by 2 first to reach y = (1/2)x + 3, where the gradient is 1/2. "Both equations have a negative x-term" is not a valid test at all — P's equation does have a negative x-term, but Q's, once rearranged, does not, and matching signs say nothing about the actual gradients.
- (d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
- (b) 25 — Substitute n = 7: 4 × 7 − 3 = 28 − 3 = 25. Forgetting to subtract 3 gives 4 × 7 = 28. Subtracting 3 from 7 before multiplying by 4, 4 × (7 − 3) = 16, applies the operations in the wrong order. Substituting n = 8 by miscounting the position gives 4 × 8 − 3 = 29.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.