Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 12 — Method: write both ages as they were six years ago, call Leo's present age x, and form an equation from the comparison at that time. Working: six years ago Harry was 24 − 6 = 18 and Leo was x − 6, so 18 = 3(x − 6); expanding gives 18 = 3x − 18, adding 18 to both sides gives 36 = 3x, and dividing by 3 gives x = 12. Checking: six years ago Harry was 18 and Leo was 6, and 18 = 3 × 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 6 comes from solving 18 = 3(x − 6) as far as Leo's age six years ago, 18 ÷ 3 = 6, and giving that as his age now; 8 comes from dividing Harry's present age by 3, 24 ÷ 3 = 8, using the multiple at the wrong moment in time; 36 comes from stopping at 3x = 36 and giving 36 as Leo's age.
- (b) −3 — Method: the gradient of a straight line is the change in y divided by the change in x, with the two coordinates taken in the same order in the numerator as in the denominator. Working: going from (−1, 5) to (3, −7), the change in y is −7 − 5 = −12 and the change in x is 3 − (−1) = 4, so the gradient is −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Answer: −3. The distractors: 3 comes from subtracting the y-coordinates in one order and the x-coordinates in the other, giving 12 ÷ 4; −1/3 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, giving 4 ÷ (−12); −6 comes from working out 3 − (−1) as 3 − 1 = 2, so that the change in y is divided by 2 rather than by 4.
- (b) 12n — Distributing the minus sign across the second bracket gives n² + 6n + 9 − n² + 6n − 9, and the n² terms and the +9/−9 cancel, leaving 6n + 6n = 12n. Writing 18 comes from only negating the first term of the second bracket, n², and treating the −6n and +9 as unchanged, which gives n² + 6n + 9 − n² − 6n + 9 = 18. Writing 2n² + 18 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting them, (n² + 6n + 9) + (n² − 6n + 9) = 2n² + 18. Writing 6n comes from correctly negating the bracket but then only counting one of the two 6n terms, missing that they add rather than cancel.
- (c) x = 3 and x = −5 — To factorise x² + 2x − 15, find two numbers that multiply to −15 and add to 2: these are 5 and −3, since 5 × (−3) = −15 and 5 + (−3) = 2. So x² + 2x − 15 = (x + 5)(x − 3). Setting each factor to zero gives x = −5 and x = 3. Choosing x = −3 and x = 5 comes from swapping the signs of the correct roots. Choosing x = 5 and x = 3 uses the right pair of numbers, 5 and 3, but forgets that one of them must be negative for the product to equal −15. Choosing x = −15 and x = 1 mistakes the constant term, −15, for one of the roots, and pairs it oddly with x = 1.
- (b) (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) — To subtract these fractions, write them over the common denominator (x − 1)(x + 3): the numerator becomes 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1). Expanding gives 4x + 12 − 2x + 2, which simplifies to 2x + 14, so the answer is (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)). Writing (2x + 11)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from not distributing the minus sign fully across the second bracket, treating −2(x − 1) as −2x − 1 instead of −2x + 2. Writing 2/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from subtracting the two original numerators directly, 4 − 2 = 2, the same mistake as subtracting fractions without a common denominator. Writing (2x − 10)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from swapping which numerator multiplies which bracket, forming 4(x − 1) − 2(x + 3) instead of 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1).
- (d) y = −f(x + 2) has a maximum turning point at (1, 5). — y = f(x + 2) translates the graph 2 units in the negative x-direction, so the turning point's x-coordinate moves from 3 to 1; reflecting in the x-axis then negates the y-coordinate, turning −5 into 5, and also turns a minimum into a maximum — giving a true maximum turning point at (1, 5). Translating the root at x = 1 in the wrong direction, adding 2 instead of subtracting it, gives x = 3, but the true image root is at 1 − 2 = −1, so that statement is false. Keeping the coordinates (1, 5) correct but forgetting that reflecting in the x-axis turns a minimum into a maximum gives a false "minimum turning point" statement. Getting the reflection's effect on the turning-point type right (a maximum) but translating the x-coordinate in the wrong direction, using 3 + 2 = 5 instead of 3 − 2 = 1, gives a false statement at (5, 5).
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (a) 7n + 4 — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 18 − 11 = 7, 25 − 18 = 7, 32 − 25 = 7, so the terms increase by 7 each time and the nth term has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 11, so c = 4. Answer: the correct nth term is 7n + 4. The value 7n is Ravi's value, which comes from using only the common difference and leaving out the constant. The value 7n + 11 comes from using the first term as the constant directly, without subtracting the common difference first. The value 11n + 7 comes from swapping the roles of the first term and the common difference — using the first term, 11, as the coefficient of n and the difference, 7, as the constant.
- (d) L/6 − 4 — Method: find the length of one equal piece first (divide by 6), then apply the later change (subtract 4) to that piece. Working: one piece is L/6 metres; removing 4 metres from it gives L/6 − 4. Answer: L/6 − 4. L/6 + 4 comes from adding the 4 metres instead of removing it. (L − 4)/6 comes from removing the 4 metres from the whole rope before cutting it into pieces, the wrong order. 4 − L/6 comes from subtracting the piece length from 4 instead of the other way round.
- (a) 12 + 4√2 — a₁ = 4, a₂ = 4√2, and a₃ = a₁ × r² = 4 × (√2)² = 4 × 2 = 8. The sum of the first three terms is 4 + 4√2 + 8 = 12 + 4√2. 8 + 4√2 comes from leaving out a₁ and adding only a₂ + a₃ = 4√2 + 8. 36 + 4√2 comes from squaring the whole second term instead of applying the ratio to the first term: (4√2)² = 32 used as a₃, giving 4 + 4√2 + 32 = 36 + 4√2. 4 + 12√2 comes from using r³ instead of r² for the third term: 4 × (√2)³ = 4 × 2√2 = 8√2, giving 4 + 4√2 + 8√2 = 4 + 12√2.
- (b) y = 84 − 14x — Method: the distance still to go is the whole route minus the distance already covered, and at a steady speed the distance covered after x hours is the speed multiplied by x. Working: after x hours Freya has cycled 14x km, so the distance remaining is the 84 km route take away 14x, giving y = 84 − 14x, a straight line with intercept 84 and gradient −14. Answer: y = 84 − 14x. The distractors: y = 84 + 14x comes from adding the distance cycled to the length of the route rather than taking it away, so the ride would grow longer the further she goes; y = 14x − 84 comes from carrying out the subtraction the wrong way round, which is negative for the whole of the ride; y = 14 − 84x comes from swapping the two numbers over, treating 84 km as the hourly speed and 14 km as the length of the route.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (d) 12 — Method: substitute the value into both terms, remembering that subtracting a negative number has the same effect as adding the matching positive number. Working: n² = (−3) × (−3) = 9, and subtracting n means subtracting −3, which adds 3, so the calculation is 9 + 3 = 12. Answer: 12. The distractors: 6 comes from subtracting 3 rather than subtracting −3, giving 9 − 3; −6 comes from squaring −3 as −9 while still adding the 3, giving −9 + 3; −3 comes from reading n² as 2n, giving 2 × (−3) = −6 and then −6 + 3.
- (a) Litres — The area under a graph is found by multiplying a y-value by an x-value, so its units are the y-axis units multiplied by the x-axis units: litres per minute × minutes = litres, since the 'per minute' cancels with the 'minutes'. Answering 'litres per minute' keeps the y-axis units unchanged, as if multiplying by time did nothing to the units at all. Answering 'litres per minute squared' treats the x-axis as also being measured 'per minute', squaring a unit that should instead cancel. Answering 'minutes' keeps only the x-axis units and drops the rate altogether.
- (d) 8 — Working backwards by halving (undoing the doubling), one 4-hour step at a time: 9,600 (20 h) → 4,800 (16 h) → 2,400 (12 h) → 1,200 (8 h) → 600 (4 h) → 300 (0 h). Reading these in time order — 300, 600, 1,200, 2,400, 4,800, 9,600 at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 hours — the population is still at or below 1,000 at 4 hours (600) and first goes above 1,000 at 8 hours (1,200). So the recorded population first exceeds 1,000 at 8 hours. Answering 20 just reads off the time stated in the question, without working out when the threshold was actually first crossed — wrong, because 9,600 is only the value AT 20 hours, not necessarily the first time the population passed 1,000. Answering 0 comes from recovering the starting population by dividing 9,600 by 5 (the number of 4-hour gaps up to 20 hours) instead of by 2⁵ = 32 (the correct number of halvings), giving a wrongly-inflated starting value of 9,600 ÷ 5 = 1,920 — already above 1,000 at 0 hours — wrong, because doubling means the value must be halved five times, dividing by 2 five times (2⁵ = 32), not divided once by the number of gaps. Answering 12 comes from halving back only twice, from 9,600 to 4,800 (16 h) to 2,400 (12 h), and stopping there because 2,400 is already above 1,000, without checking that 1,200 at 8 hours is also above 1,000 and occurs earlier — wrong, because the FIRST recorded time above 1,000 is the earliest such time, not the first one reached while working backwards from 20 hours.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.