Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) Wrong — the product is −4/25, not −1. — The student's rearrangement is correct: 5y = −2x + 15 gives y = −(2/5)x + 3, gradient −2/5. But the test for perpendicularity is that the product of the two gradients equals exactly −1, not merely that it is negative. Here 2/5 × (−2/5) = −4/25, which is not −1, so the lines are NOT perpendicular. Distractor routes: "a negative product always means perpendicular" states a rule that does not exist — many pairs of lines have a negative gradient product without being perpendicular, as this pair shows. "The rearrangement is incorrect" wrongly blames a correct step; 5y = −2x + 15 does rearrange to y = −(2/5)x + 3. "2/5 and −2/5 are negatives of each other" notices a true but irrelevant fact — being negatives of each other is not the perpendicularity condition; an exact product of −1 is.
- (c) 3c + 2d — Method: 'triple c' is 3c, 'double d' is 2d, and 'add' joins the two separate terms with a plus sign. Working: 3c + 2d. Answer: 3c + 2d. 2c + 3d comes from swapping which letter gets tripled and which gets doubled. 6cd comes from multiplying the two terms together instead of adding them, and also multiplying the coefficients (3 × 2 = 6). 5(c + d) comes from adding the coefficients (3 + 2 = 5) and applying that single number to both letters together, as if c and d always came as a pair.
- (c) 37 — The first differences are 3, 5, 7, 9 — they increase by 2 each time (the second difference), so the next first difference is 11, giving 26+11=37. A candidate who repeats the last first difference (9) instead of increasing it would reach 26+9=35. A candidate who increases the difference by 4 instead of 2 would reach 26+13=39. A candidate who adds only the second difference (2) to the last term, instead of the next first difference, would reach 26+2=28.
- (d) x = 0, y = −1 and x = 3, y = 5 — Set the two expressions for y equal: 2x − 1 = x² − x − 1. Rearranging, subtracting 2x and adding 1 to both sides: 0 = x² − x − 1 − 2x + 1 = x² − 3x, so x² − 3x = 0. Factorise: x(x − 3) = 0, giving x = 0 or x = 3. Using y = 2x − 1: x = 0 gives y = −1; x = 3 gives y = 5. Distractor routes: x = 0, y = −1 alone stops after the factor x = 0 and never checks the second factor, x − 3 = 0. x = 0, y = −1 and x = −3, y = −7 comes from mis-factorising x² − 3x as x(x + 3), a sign error that gives a second root of −3 instead of 3. x = −2, y = −5 and x = 1, y = 1 comes from adding 2x to both sides instead of subtracting it when rearranging, giving x² + x − 2 = 0 instead of x² − 3x = 0.
- (b) (3x + 1)(2x − 3) — To factorise 6x² − 7x − 3, look for two numbers that multiply to 6 × (−3) = −18 and add to −7: these are −9 and 2. Splitting the middle term gives 6x² − 9x + 2x − 3, which groups to 3x(2x − 3) + 1(2x − 3) = (3x + 1)(2x − 3). Writing (3x − 1)(2x + 3) comes from using the pair 9 and −2 instead — the right product but the wrong signs, giving +7x instead of −7x. Writing (6x − 1)(x + 3) comes from picking the factor pair 18 and −1: it multiplies to −18 correctly, but it adds to 17, not −7, so checking only the product splits the middle term as 6x² + 18x − x − 3 and pairs the wrong factors of 6 and 3 together. Writing (x − 3)(6x + 1) comes from that same unchecked pair used the other way round, splitting the middle term as 6x² + x − 18x − 3.
- (c) −8 — (−2)³ = (−2) × (−2) × (−2) = −8, since multiplying three negative numbers gives a negative result. A candidate who forgets the sign of a negative number when cubing it might treat (−2)³ as if it were 2³ = 8. A candidate who multiplies −2 by 3 instead of cubing it might get −2 × 3 = −6. A candidate who combines both mistakes — multiplying by 3 and dropping the sign — might get 2 × 3 = 6.
- (d) n and n + 1 are consecutive integers, so one of them must be even; this makes n(n + 1) even, so 4n(n + 1) is 4 × an even number, which is a multiple of 8. — The proof needs a reason why n(n + 1) is even, not just an assertion. n and n + 1 are consecutive integers, so exactly one of them is even; multiplying by that even number keeps n(n + 1) even, so 4n(n + 1) = 4 × (an even number), and 4 × an even number always has a further factor of 2 hidden inside it, making the whole product a multiple of 8. The option 'is a multiple of 4, and because n and n + 1 are consecutive integers, it must be a multiple of 8' asserts the multiple-of-8 conclusion directly from 'multiple of 4' and 'consecutive integers' without ever showing that n(n + 1) itself is even — the missing step is exactly what earns the mark. The option '4n is always a multiple of 4 ... which means it is a multiple of 8' mistakes 4n being a multiple of 4 for the whole product 4n(n + 1) being a multiple of 8; that extra factor of 2 only comes from n(n + 1) being even, not from 4n alone. The option that expands to 4n² + 4n and calls it 'clearly a multiple of 8' never checks for a factor of 2 beyond the 4 already there — the word 'clearly' is standing in for a missing argument.
- (d) £40 — Method: add the two prices to make one expression in x, turn 'at least' into ≥, solve the inequality, then read the lowest possible price off the boundary of the solution set. Working: the two items cost x + (2x + 30) = 3x + 30 pounds, so 3x + 30 ≥ 150; subtracting 30 from both sides gives 3x ≥ 120; dividing both sides by 3 gives x ≥ 40, and the smallest value the shirt price is allowed to take is the boundary, £40. Answer: £40. The distractors: £50 comes from leaving the £30 out of the total and solving 3x ≥ 150; £60 comes from using the trousers expression on its own, 2x + 30 ≥ 150; £120 comes from stopping at 3x ≥ 120 and reading the 120 as the price of the shirt without dividing by 3.
- (b) 6 — Method: for any point that lies on y = k/x, the value of k is found by multiplying the x-coordinate and the y-coordinate together, since k = x × y. Working: k = 2 × 3 = 6. Answer: k = 6. Distractor refutation: 1.5 comes from dividing the y-coordinate by the x-coordinate instead of multiplying them. 5 comes from adding the two coordinates instead of multiplying them. 9 comes from misreading the point's x-coordinate as 3 instead of 2, then multiplying 3 × 3.
- (b) 1.6 m/s² — Acceleration is the change in velocity divided by the time taken: (11 − 3) ÷ 5 = 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6 m/s². Forgetting to subtract the initial velocity and dividing the final velocity by the time instead gives 11 ÷ 5 = 2.2 m/s². Inverting the fraction, dividing the time by the change in velocity, gives 5 ÷ 8 = 0.625 m/s². Finding the change in velocity, 8 m/s, but stopping without dividing by the time gives 8 m/s².
- (d) n/2 + 5 — Half of n is n ÷ 2, which is written as the fraction n/2. 'More than' means add, and the addition happens after the halving, so the expression is n/2 + 5. Writing (n + 5)/2 halves the 5 as well, because everything inside a bracket is divided; writing 2n + 5 doubles n instead of halving it; writing 5n/2 multiplies half of n by 5 instead of adding 5 to it.
- (a) y = −3x − 5 — Gradient = (−8 − 4) ÷ (1 − (−3)) = −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Using the point (1, −8): −8 = −3(1) + c, so c = −5, giving y = −3x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient, using m = 3 instead, would then solve −8 = 3(1) + c to get c = −11, writing y = 3x − 11. A candidate who makes a sign error isolating c, writing c = 5 instead of −5, would write y = −3x + 5. A candidate who mixes up both mistakes — keeping the correct gradient but the wrong, positive value of c from the flipped-gradient calculation — would write y = −3x + 11.
- (b) £14 — Method: read the fixed charge (the cost at 0 miles) and the rate (the cost per extra mile) from the graph, then use them to work out the cost for a distance beyond the part that is plotted. Working: the graph shows a fixed charge of £2 at 0 miles, and the cost rises by £2 for every extra mile, so for 6 miles the cost is £2 + (£2 × 6) = £2 + £12 = £14. Answer: £14. Distractor refutation: £12 comes from multiplying the rate by the distance and leaving out the £2 fixed charge. £8 comes from misreading the rate as £1 per mile instead of £2 per mile. £24 comes from adding the fixed charge to the rate first and then multiplying the total by the distance, instead of multiplying the rate by the distance and then adding the fixed charge.
- (a) x = 6 or x = −4 — We need two numbers that multiply to −24 and add to −2: these are −6 and 4, since −6 × 4 = −24 and −6 + 4 = −2. So x² − 2x − 24 = (x − 6)(x + 4) = 0, giving x = 6 or x = −4. A candidate who swaps the signs, using 6 and −4 the wrong way round in the brackets, gets x = −6 or x = 4. A candidate who picks the wrong factor pair, 8 and −3 (which multiply to −24 but add to +5, not −2), gets (x + 8)(x − 3) = 0 and answers x = −8 or x = 3. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets x = −6 or x = −4, which would require the constant term to be +24, not −24.
- (d) g is one-to-one: f(3) = f(−3), removed by x ≥ 0 — A function has an inverse only if it is one-to-one: every output must come from exactly one input. f(3) = 9 and f(−3) = 9, so two different inputs give the same output, and there is no way to send 9 back to a single input — f is not one-to-one over all real x. Restricting the domain to x ≥ 0 removes one of the two inputs behind every such pair, so g is one-to-one and does have an inverse. 'g's outputs are positive; f's could be negative' is wrong because f(x) = x² also only gives outputs of 0 or more — the outputs of f and g are identical sets; it is the INPUTS that differ, not the outputs. 'Restricting any domain always creates an inverse' is wrong because a restriction only helps if it actually removes the repeated outputs: restricting f(x) = x² to x ≥ −3 still leaves f(1) = f(−1) = 1, so that restricted function is still not one-to-one and still has no inverse. 'Squares can never be reversed, under any conditions' is wrong because √9 = 3 does reverse 3² = 9 once you know the input was non-negative — a square root just cannot tell you WHICH of two inputs you started from unless the domain has already ruled one of them out.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.