Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) £195 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 45x + 60 gives y = 45 × 3 + 60 = 135 + 60 = 195. A candidate who forgets to add the call-out fee would get only 45 × 3 = £135. A candidate who adds the hours to the fee and the rate instead of multiplying would get 45 + 60 + 3 = £108. A candidate who multiplies both the hourly rate and the call-out fee by the number of hours would get 45 × 3 + 60 × 3 = £315.
- (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
- (a) y = −2x + 7 — Using y = −2x + c, and substituting the point (3, 1): 1 = −2(3) + c, so 1 = −6 + c, and c = 7, giving y = −2x + 7. A candidate who uses the y-coordinate of the point directly as the y-intercept, instead of solving for c, would write y = −2x + 1. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the gradient would write y = 2x + 7. A candidate who makes a sign error when isolating c, writing c = 1 − 6 = −5 instead of c = 1 + 6 = 7, would write y = −2x − 5.
- (a) (15, 0) — Method: the tangent is perpendicular to the radius at the point of contact, so find the gradient of the radius, take its negative reciprocal, write the equation of the tangent, then substitute y = 0 because every point on the x-axis has y-coordinate 0. Working: the radius from (0, 0) to (3, 6) has gradient 6 ÷ 3 = 2, so the tangent has gradient −1/2. Substituting into y − 6 = −1/2(x − 3) gives y = −0.5x + 7.5. Setting y = 0 gives 0.5x = 7.5, so x = 15 and P is (15, 0). Answer: (15, 0). The distractors: (0, 7.5) is where the same tangent crosses the y-axis, reached by setting x = 0 instead of y = 0; (0, 0) comes from using the gradient of the radius, 2, for the tangent, which gives the line y = 2x through the centre and so crosses the x-axis at the origin; (6, 0) comes from changing the sign of the radius gradient without turning it upside down, which gives y = −2x + 12.
- (a) A translation by vector (0, 3) — y = x² + 3 adds a constant outside the squaring, so it is a vertical translation of y = x² — every point moves the same distance parallel to the y-axis, with no change in x. The vector is (0, 3), matching the +3. A vector of (3, 0) confuses this with a horizontal shift; (0, −3) has the right axis but the wrong sign, since the graph moves up, not down; a stretch changes the shape of the curve, which adding a constant term never does.
- (a) It is 2(w + (w + 3)) = 4w + 6, not 2w + 3. — The perimeter of a rectangle is twice the width plus twice the length: 2 × w + 2 × (w + 3) = 2w + 2w + 6 = 4w + 6, so the gardener's 2w + 3 is wrong. Writing w + (w + 3) = 2w + 3 forgets to double the sides at all, only adding one width and one length once. Writing 4(w + 3) = 4w + 12 wrongly treats all four sides as equal to the length, as if the garden were a square. Writing 3w + 6 comes from doubling the length correctly but adding the width only once instead of doubling it too.
- (c) n = 4 — Testing n = 4: 4² = 16, and 16 + 4 + 1 = 21, and 21 = 3 × 7 is not a prime number, so this value disproves the claim. Testing n = 1: 1² = 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, which is prime, so it does not disprove the claim. Testing n = 2: 2² = 4, and 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, which is prime. Testing n = 3: 3² = 9, and 9 + 3 + 1 = 13, which is also prime — a counterexample has to give a result that isn't prime, and only n = 4 does that.
- (c) No — that moment has already passed — Method: call the number of years from now x, add x to both ages, form the equation from the comparison and then interpret the value of x that comes out. Working: in x years Harry will be 14 + x and Mia will be 8 + x, so 14 + x = 2(8 + x); expanding gives 14 + x = 16 + 2x, and subtracting x and 16 from both sides gives x = −2. A negative value of x places the moment two years in the past, when Harry was 12 and Mia was 6 and 12 = 2 × 6, so it is not something still to come. Answer: no — that moment has already passed. The distractors: the claim that it has never happened and never will comes from reaching x = −2 and reading a negative number of years as no solution at all, when x = −2 does not say that no such moment exists but says where it is — two years before now; the claim that it happens when Harry is 16 comes from doubling Mia's present age, 2 × 8 = 16, and reading that as the age Harry has to reach; the claim that it happens when Harry is 20 comes from expanding 2(8 + x) as 8 + 2x, doubling only the x, which gives x = 6.
- (a) They always charge the same, since 3(2n + 4) = 6n + 12. — Expand Advert A's formula by multiplying both terms inside the bracket by 3: 3 × 2n = 6n, and 3 × 4 = 12, giving 3(2n + 4) = 6n + 12, which is identical to Advert B's formula — so the two adverts always charge the same amount, whatever n is. Getting 6n + 4 comes from multiplying the 2n by 3 but leaving the 4 unmultiplied. Getting 2n + 7 comes from adding 3 to the bracket instead of multiplying by it. Saying it depends on n avoids expanding the bracket at all — once expanded, both formulas are identical for every value of n, so the cost can be compared directly.
- (d) y = −2x + 10 — Method: a tangent is perpendicular to the radius drawn to the point where it touches, so work out the gradient of that radius, take its negative reciprocal for the tangent, then substitute into y − y₁ = m(x − x₁). Working: the radius joins (0, 0) to (4, 2), so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; turning 1/2 upside down gives 2 and changing the sign gives −2. Substituting into y − 2 = −2(x − 4) gives y − 2 = −2x + 8, so y = −2x + 10. Answer: y = −2x + 10. The distractors: y = −0.5x + 4 changes the sign of the radius gradient but never turns it upside down, using −1/2 where −2 belongs; y = 2x − 6 turns the gradient upside down but leaves it positive, using 2 where −2 belongs; y = −2x − 10 has the correct gradient but substitutes the point with both signs reversed, writing y + 2 = −2(x + 4) instead of y − 2 = −2(x − 4).
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
- (a) x = 3 — Method: factorise x² + 2x − 15 as (x + 5)(x − 3), since 5 × (−3) = −15 and 5 + (−3) = 2. Setting each bracket equal to zero gives x + 5 = 0 or x − 3 = 0, so x = −5 or x = 3. Only x = 3 is offered here. Distractor origins: x = −3 reverses the sign of the factor pair, treating the bracket (x − 3) as giving x = −3 instead of x = 3; x = 5 takes the number from the other factor, (x + 5), but with the wrong sign, giving x = 5 instead of x = −5; x = 15 takes the constant term of the original expression as if it were a root, without factorising at all.
- (a) y = −2x − 1 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both differences taken in the same order, and the constant then comes from substituting either point into y = mx + c. Working: m = (−9 − 3) ÷ (4 − (−2)) = (−12) ÷ 6 = −2, so the line is y = −2x + c; substituting (−2, 3) gives 3 = −2 × (−2) + c = 4 + c, so c = 3 − 4 = −1. Answer: y = −2x − 1. The distractors: y = −2x + 1 comes from rearranging 3 = 4 + c the wrong way round and taking the constant as 4 − 3; y = 2x + 7 comes from losing the minus sign when −12 is divided by 6 and then substituting correctly, 3 = 2 × (−2) + c; y = −(1/2)x + 2 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 6 ÷ (−12).
- (a) 12 km/h — Method: convert 15 minutes to hours: 15 ÷ 60 = 0.25 h. Speed = distance ÷ time = 3 ÷ 0.25 = 12 km/h. Distractor origins: 9 km/h is the speed for the second section (3 km in 20 minutes) instead of the first; 8 km/h is the average speed for the whole journey (6 km in 45 minutes) instead of just the first section; 0.2 km/h divides 3 km by 15 without converting the minutes into hours.
- (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.