Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 4(x + 3) = 20 and 4x + 3 = 11 when x = 2, so the two expressions are not equivalent, because the bracket means the 3 must be added before multiplying by 4. — Substituting x = 2: 4(x + 3) = 4 × 5 = 20, and 4x + 3 = 8 + 3 = 11. The two values are different, and expanding 4(x + 3) algebraically gives 4x + 12, which can never equal 4x + 3 (that would require 12 = 3) — so the two expressions are never equivalent, for any value of x. The option claiming they become equal for a larger x is wrong: 4x + 12 = 4x + 3 has no solution at all. The option claiming they are equivalent because they share the terms 4x and 3 ignores that the bracket changes the constant term. The option that calculates 4(x + 3) as 11 ignores the bracket completely, applying the 4 only to the x term.
- (c) 2 < x < 3 — Factorise x² − 5x + 6 = (x − 2)(x − 3), giving roots x = 2 and x = 3. Since the coefficient of x² is positive, the graph is a U-shape that dips below the x-axis between its roots. So x² − 5x + 6 < 0 for 2 < x < 3. Distractor routes: x < 2 or x > 3 takes the region OUTSIDE the roots, where the graph is above the x-axis, the opposite of what is wanted. 2 ≤ x ≤ 3 uses ≤ instead of the strict < the question asks for, wrongly including the roots themselves, where the expression equals zero, not less than zero. −3 < x < −2 comes from factorising as (x + 2)(x + 3), reversing the sign of both roots.
- (a) 2 — The candle's height falls from 30 cm to 20 cm, a drop of 10 cm, over 5 minutes, so m = 10 ÷ 5 = 2. 10 comes from using the drop in height but forgetting to divide by the time. 0.5 comes from dividing the time by the drop instead of the drop by the time (5 ÷ 10). 4 comes from dividing the final height by the time, 20 ÷ 5, instead of using the drop in height.
- (d) (x − 7)² + 1 is at least 1 for every x, so y is never 0 — x² − 14x + 50 = (x − 7)² − 7² + 50 = (x − 7)² + 1. Since a squared term can never be negative, (x − 7)² ≥ 0 for every real x, so y = (x − 7)² + 1 ≥ 1 for every x — y is always at least 1, so it can never equal 0, and the curve never crosses the x-axis. Claiming the discriminant is positive is wrong on the facts: b² − 4ac = (−14)² − 4(1)(50) = 196 − 200 = −4, which is NEGATIVE, not positive — a negative discriminant is in fact the standard reason a quadratic has no real roots, so this option misstates its own sign. Claiming the turning point is at (7, −1) is wrong because completing the square gives (x − 7)² + 1, so the turning point is (7, 1) — the constant is +1, not −1, and a point with a negative y-coordinate would sit BELOW the x-axis, not above it, contradicting the option's own claim. Claiming that 50 being positive is enough is wrong because it ignores the −14x term completely — a positive constant term alone does not guarantee y stays positive for every x (the expression still dips down towards its turning point before growing again, and it is the completed square that shows how far it dips, not the constant on its own).
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
- (c) Line D — Method: the steeper of two lines is the one whose gradient is greater, and the gradient of a line through two points is the change in y divided by the change in x. Working: line C rises 2 for a run of 4, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 4 = 1/2; the other line rises 2 for a run of 2, so its gradient is 2 ÷ 2 = 1; since 1 is greater than 1/2, it is line D that is the steeper. Answer: Line D. The distractors: Line C is chosen by comparing the x-coordinates and calling the line that reaches further along the x-axis the steeper one; They are equally steep comes from comparing only the y-coordinates, which are both 2, without dividing by the two different runs; There is not enough information comes from believing that a gradient can only be measured off a drawn graph, when two points on a line are enough to work it out.
- (c) x = 3, y = 1 — Method: the y terms are +y and −y, so adding the two equations removes y and leaves an equation in x alone. Working: adding 2x + y = 7 and x − y = 2 gives 3x = 9, so x = 3; substituting x = 3 into x − y = 2 gives 3 − y = 2, so y = 1. Answer: x = 3, y = 1, which also satisfies 2 × 3 + 1 = 7. The distractors: x = 1, y = 3 comes from finding the two values correctly and then writing them against the wrong letters; x = 3, y = 2 comes from substituting x = 3 into 2x + y = 7 as 2 + 3 + y = 7, adding the coefficient instead of multiplying by it; x = 3, y = −1 comes from substituting into x − y = 2 as though it read x + y = 2.
- (d) 8 — Method: write both present ages in terms of one letter, take four years off each of them, and form an equation from the comparison four years ago. Working: let Amelia be y, so her mother is 3y; four years ago they were y − 4 and 3y − 4, giving 3y − 4 = 5(y − 4); expanding gives 3y − 4 = 5y − 20; adding 20 and subtracting 3y from both sides gives 16 = 2y, and dividing by 2 gives y = 8. Checking: Amelia is 8 and her mother 24; four years ago they were 4 and 20, and 20 = 5 × 4. Answer: 8. The distractors: 4 comes from solving correctly but giving Amelia's age four years ago instead of her age now; 16 comes from stopping at 2y = 16 and giving 16 as her age; 2 comes from collecting the y terms by adding the 5y instead of subtracting it, giving 3y + 5y = 20 − 4 and so 8y = 16.
- (c) 5 — Method: call the number of years ago t, take t off both ages, and form an equation from the comparison at that time. Working: t years ago the father was 40 − t and Ethan was 10 − t, so 40 − t = 7(10 − t); expanding gives 40 − t = 70 − 7t, adding 7t to both sides gives 40 + 6t = 70, subtracting 40 gives 6t = 30, and dividing by 6 gives t = 5. Checking: five years ago the father was 35 and Ethan was 5, and 35 = 7 × 5. Answer: 5. The distractors: 35 comes from finding the right moment but giving the father's age at that time instead of the number of years; 30 comes from using Ethan's present age on the right-hand side, 40 − t = 7 × 10, which gives t = −30 and is then written as 30; 24 comes from reaching 6t = 30 correctly and subtracting 6 instead of dividing by 6.
- (d) x > 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the numbers on the other, then divide by the coefficient of x; dividing by a positive number leaves the sign as it is. Working: subtracting 2x from both sides of 4x + 1 > 2x + 9 gives 2x + 1 > 9; subtracting 1 from both sides gives 2x > 8; dividing both sides by 2 gives x > 4. Answer: x > 4. The distractors: x < 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 2; x > 5 comes from adding the 1 to the 9 instead of subtracting it, giving 2x > 10; x < 5 comes from making both of those mistakes together.
- (a) Outside: OQ² = 221 > r² = 169 — OQ² = 10² + 11² = 100 + 121 = 221. Comparing this with r² = 169: since 221 > 169, OQ > r, so Q lies outside the circle — this is the correct verdict AND the correct working. 'Outside: OQ = 21 (10 + 11) > r = 13' reaches the same Outside verdict, but by invalid working: it adds the coordinates instead of squaring them (10 + 11 = 21, rather than 10² + 11² = 221), so the stated 'OQ' of 21 is not a distance at all — the verdict happens to match, but the method is wrong. 'Inside: OQ ≈ 14.87 < r² = 169' correctly finds the distance OQ = √221 ≈ 14.87, but then compares that DISTANCE with r² = 169 instead of with r = 13 — comparing two different kinds of quantity gives a meaningless, and here wrong, verdict. 'Inside: OQ² = 221 < (2r)² = 676' confuses the radius with the diameter: it compares OQ² with the diameter squared, (2 × 13)² = 676, instead of with r² = 169.
- (c) −0.5 — fg(x) = f(g(x)) = f(x²) = x² + 2. gf(x) = g(f(x)) = g(x + 2) = (x + 2)² = x² + 4x + 4. Setting fg(x) = gf(x): x² + 2 = x² + 4x + 4. Subtract x² from both sides: 2 = 4x + 4. Subtract 4 from both sides: −2 = 4x, so x = −0.5. Writing 1.5 comes from adding the 4 instead of subtracting it: 4x = 2 + 4 = 6, giving x = 1.5. Writing 'no solution' comes from expanding (x + 2)² as x² + 4 using (a + b)² = a² + b², losing the middle term — the equation then reads x² + 2 = x² + 4, which has no solution, but the expansion itself is wrong. Writing 0 comes from treating gf(x) as g(x) + f(x) instead of g(f(x)): x² + (x + 2) = x² + 2 gives x = 0, but that adds the two functions rather than composing them.
- (b) −3/4 — The tangent to a circle at a point is always perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point. The radius from (0, 0) to (3, 4) has gradient 4/3. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line with gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m, so the tangent's gradient here is −3/4. Using the radius's own gradient, forgetting that the tangent is perpendicular to it, gives 4/3. Negating the radius's gradient without also taking the reciprocal gives −4/3. Taking the reciprocal of the radius's gradient without negating it gives 3/4.
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (c) x + 18 — Expand −3(2x − 6) by multiplying both terms by −3: −3 × 2x = −6x and −3 × (−6) = 18, giving 7x − 6x + 18 = x + 18. Writing x − 18 comes from not flipping the sign of the −6 inside the bracket, so −3 × (−6) is treated as −18 instead of +18. Writing x + 6 comes from forgetting to multiply the −6 by 3, only carrying its sign. Writing 13x − 18 comes from treating the whole bracket as being added rather than subtracted, so 3(2x − 6) = 6x − 18 is added to 7x.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.