Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Non-calculator
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) x ≤ 5 — Method: divide out the bracket first, then undo the number term; the inequality sign turns round only if both sides are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Working: dividing both sides of 2(x − 1) ≤ 8 by 2 gives x − 1 ≤ 4, and 2 is positive so the ≤ is unchanged; adding 1 to both sides gives x ≤ 5. Answer: x ≤ 5. The distractors: x ≤ 3 comes from subtracting 1 from 4 instead of adding 1 to both sides; x ≤ 4 comes from stopping at 8 ÷ 2 = 4 and never undoing the −1 inside the bracket; x < 5 comes from reading ≤ as a strict inequality, which wrongly leaves the boundary value out of the solution set.
- (d) Below y = x + 1, below x + y = 5, above y = 0 — For y ≤ x + 1, R lies on or below the line y = x + 1. For x + y ≤ 5 (that is, y ≤ 5 − x), R lies on or below that line too. For y ≥ 0, R lies on or above the x-axis. Combining all three: R is below y = x + 1, below x + y = 5, and above y = 0. Distractor routes: "Above y = x + 1" flips the first inequality, describing the wrong side of that line. "Above x + y = 5" flips the second inequality, describing the wrong side of that line. "Below y = 0" flips the third inequality, describing the wrong side of the x-axis.
- (d) £2000 — This is an arithmetic sequence with first term £500 and common difference £300. The 6th term is 500 + 5 × 300 = 2000. A candidate who uses 6 lots of the increase instead of 5 gets 500 + 6 × 300 = 2300. A candidate who forgets to add the first year's profit at all gets 5 × 300 = 1500. A candidate who miscounts the number of increases as 4 instead of 5 gets 500 + 4 × 300 = 1700.
- (d) x = 2 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 2, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 2x + 6 = 10; subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 4; dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 5 comes from dividing both sides by 2 first, reaching x + 3 = 5 and writing 5 without taking the 3 away; x = 8 comes from adding 6 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16; x = 3.5 comes from expanding 2(x + 3) as 2x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 2, which leads to 2x = 7.
- (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
- (b) Translate −90° in x, then translate −2 in y. — cos(x + 90°) translates the graph 90° in the NEGATIVE x-direction, since a positive shift inside the bracket moves a graph left, not right, and subtracting 2 afterwards translates it 2 units in the negative y-direction (down). So the sequence is: translate −90° in x, then translate −2 in y. Using +90° in x reverses the direction of the horizontal shift — the sign inside the bracket moves the graph the opposite way to what it looks like. Using +2 in y reverses the direction of the vertical shift; subtracting 2 outside the function moves the graph down, not up. Describing the −2 as a reflection in the x-axis is wrong because a reflection turns positive y-values negative and vice versa, whereas here every y-value is simply reduced by the fixed amount 2, which is what a translation does, not a reflection.
- (c) x = 3, y = 1 — Method: the y terms are +y and −y, so adding the two equations removes y and leaves an equation in x alone. Working: adding 2x + y = 7 and x − y = 2 gives 3x = 9, so x = 3; substituting x = 3 into x − y = 2 gives 3 − y = 2, so y = 1. Answer: x = 3, y = 1, which also satisfies 2 × 3 + 1 = 7. The distractors: x = 1, y = 3 comes from finding the two values correctly and then writing them against the wrong letters; x = 3, y = 2 comes from substituting x = 3 into 2x + y = 7 as 2 + 3 + y = 7, adding the coefficient instead of multiplying by it; x = 3, y = −1 comes from substituting into x − y = 2 as though it read x + y = 2.
- (c) −4 — f(2) = 7, and y = f(x) + a passing through (2, 3) means f(2) + a = 3, so 7 + a = 3, giving a = 3 − 7 = −4. Writing a = 4 comes from subtracting the wrong way round, 7 − 3 instead of 3 − 7. Writing a = 10 comes from adding the two y-values instead of subtracting one from the other. Writing a = 3 comes from taking the new y-coordinate as the value of a directly, without accounting for the original y-value of 7 at all.
- (a) 8 — f(x − 1) means every input to f is reduced by 1 before it is looked up. At x = 2, the input to f becomes 2 − 1 = 1, so f(x − 1) at x = 2 is f(1) = 8. Reading f(2) = 4 directly from the table, without applying the shift, gives 4. Shifting in the wrong direction, using x + 1 = 3 instead of x − 1 = 1, gives f(3) = 1. Confusing f(x − 1) with f(x) − 1 — taking f(2) = 4 and then subtracting 1 — gives 3.
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
- (a) The equation has one solution; the inequality has many. — Method: solve each statement. From 2x + 3 = 11, 2x = 8, so x = 4 — a single value. From 2x + 3 > 11, 2x > 8, so x > 4 — every number greater than 4 makes the inequality true, so there are many solutions. So the equation has one solution and the inequality has many. Distractor origins: swapping the two round gives the range to the equation and the single value to the inequality; saying both have exactly one solution treats the > sign as if it were an = sign; saying both have many solutions treats the equation as if it were an inequality.
- (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
- (b) 3/2 — Rearrange 2x + 3y = 6 into y = mx + c: 3y = −2x + 6, so y = −(2/3)x + 2. The gradient of this line is −2/3. The perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal: 3/2. Distractor routes: −1/2 comes from reading the gradient straight off the x-coefficient, 2, without dividing by the y-coefficient, 3, first, then taking its negative reciprocal. −3/2 correctly finds the gradient −2/3 but only takes its reciprocal without also changing the sign, giving −3/2 instead of 3/2. 2/3 comes from negating the gradient −2/3 to 2/3, but forgetting to also take the reciprocal.
- (a) 2(3x + 1) = 6x + 2 — Expanding 2(3x + 1) = 6x + 2 gives an expression that matches the right-hand side exactly for every value of x — it is an identity. 4x − 3 = 3x + 5 is an ordinary equation with one solution, x = 8. 7 − x = x − 7 is also an ordinary equation with one solution, x = 7. 5x + 1 = 5(x + 1) never holds for any value of x at all, since expanding the right-hand side gives 5x + 5, and 5x + 1 = 5x + 5 would require 1 = 5, which is impossible.
- (a) 7 — Subtract 4 from both sides: 3h ≤ 21. Divide both sides by 3: h ≤ 7, so the greatest whole number of hours is 7. A candidate who forgets the £4 fixed fee solves 3h ≤ 25, getting h ≤ 8.33, rounded down to 8. A candidate who adds the £4 instead of subtracting it solves 3h ≤ 29, getting h ≤ 9.67, rounded down to 9. A candidate who reaches h ≤ 7 but wrongly assumes the boundary value cannot be used, thinking that spending the whole £25 is not allowed, answers 6.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.