Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) (n − 5)/2 — Method: do the subtraction first, keep it together as a single bracket, then divide that whole bracket by 2. Working: 'subtract 5 from n' is (n − 5); 'divide the result by 2' means the whole bracket goes over 2, giving (n − 5)/2. Answer: (n − 5)/2. n/2 − 5 comes from dividing n by 2 first and only then subtracting 5, the wrong order. 2(n − 5) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. (5 − n)/2 comes from subtracting n from 5 instead of subtracting 5 from n, the wrong way round.
- (b) y = −(1/3)x + 2 — Method: two lines are perpendicular when the product of their gradients is −1, so the gradient of a line perpendicular to one of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1 divided by m. Working: reading m from y = 3x + 1 gives a gradient of 3, so the perpendicular gradient is −1 ÷ 3 = −1/3, and the line carrying that gradient is y = −(1/3)x + 2; the check 3 × (−1/3) = −1 confirms it. Answer: y = −(1/3)x + 2. The distractors: y = 3x − 4 comes from using an equal gradient, which is the test for parallel lines rather than perpendicular ones; y = (1/3)x + 2 comes from turning the gradient upside down but leaving out the change of sign, giving a product of 1 instead of −1; y = −3x + 2 comes from changing the sign of the gradient without turning it upside down, giving a product of −9.
- (d) h = 2A / (a + b) — Method: undo the multiplication by 1/2 by multiplying both sides by 2, then undo the multiplication by (a + b) by dividing both sides by it. Working: A = (a + b)h / 2, so multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = (a + b)h, then dividing both sides by (a + b) gives h = 2A / (a + b). The value h = A / (a + b) comes from forgetting to multiply by 2 to clear the 1/2 first. The value h = 2A / a + b comes from dividing only by a and leaving b outside the fraction, instead of dividing by the whole bracket (a + b). The value h = (a + b) / (2A) comes from inverting the fraction.
- (a) (−6, −3) — Reflecting in the y-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate and keeps the y-coordinate the same: (−6, −3). (6, 3) comes from reflecting in the x-axis instead, which changes the sign of the y-coordinate. (−6, 3) comes from reflecting in both axes. (6, −3) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (d) 66 — 6 and (4x + 3) are correct factors of 24x + 18. — Substituting x=2 into 24x+18: 24×2+18=48+18=66. Checking the factorisation: 6×4x=24x and 6×3=18, so 6(4x+3)=24x+18, matching the original expression — 6 and (4x+3) are correctly identified as factors. A candidate who substitutes x=2 into (4x+3) but forgets to multiply by the factor 6 afterwards would compute just 4×2+3=11. A candidate who adds 24 and 18 together before multiplying by x, instead of multiplying 24 by x first, would compute (24+18)×2=84. A candidate who distributes the 6 over only the first term inside the brackets, forgetting the second, would check the factorisation as 6×4x=24x but leave the 3 unmultiplied, getting 24x+3 instead of 24x+18 — and would wrongly conclude that 6 and (4x+3) are not correct factors.
- (c) y = 3x + 5 — Method: find the gradient from the two points, then substitute one point into y = mx + c to find c. Working: gradient = (14 − 2) ÷ (3 − (−1)) = 12 ÷ 4 = 3. Using the point (3, 14): 14 = 3(3) + c, so 14 = 9 + c, giving c = 5. Answer: y = 3x + 5. y = 6x − 4 comes from mishandling the negative x-coordinate, treating 3 − (−1) as 3 − 1 = 2, so the gradient becomes 12 ÷ 2 = 6, and then c = 14 − 18 = −4. y = 3x + 23 comes from a sign error isolating c, adding 9 to 14 instead of subtracting it: c = 14 + 9 = 23. y = x/3 + 13 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, giving a gradient of 4 ÷ 12 = 1/3, and then c = 14 − 1 = 13.
- (a) (4, −8), a minimum point — The transformation x → x + 1 inside f translates the graph 1 unit to the LEFT, so the x-coordinate becomes 5 − 1 = 4. The minus sign in front of f reflects the graph in the x-axis, so the y-coordinate becomes −8, and a reflection in the x-axis turns every maximum into a minimum, so (4, −8) is a minimum point. Writing '(4, −8), a maximum point' gets the coordinates right but forgets that a reflection in the x-axis swaps maximum and minimum points. Writing '(6, −8), a minimum point' comes from translating 1 unit to the RIGHT instead of the left — f(x + 1) always moves the graph in the negative x-direction. Writing '(4, 8), a minimum point' gets the x-coordinate and the type right, but forgets to actually negate the y-coordinate, even though it does correctly reclassify the point as a minimum.
- (a) 3x = 12 — Adding the two equations: the y-terms, +y and −y, have opposite signs, so they cancel; the x-terms combine to 2x + x = 3x; and the right-hand sides add to 11 + 1 = 12. This gives 3x = 12. A candidate who forgets that the y-terms cancel, and instead adds them as if they had the same sign, would write 3x + 2y = 12. A candidate who subtracts the right-hand sides instead of adding them would get 3x = 10. A candidate who correctly reaches 3x = 12 but then treats 12 itself as the value of x, skipping the final division, would write x = 12.
- (b) −3 — Method: the gradient of a straight line is the change in y divided by the change in x, with the two coordinates taken in the same order in the numerator as in the denominator. Working: going from (−1, 5) to (3, −7), the change in y is −7 − 5 = −12 and the change in x is 3 − (−1) = 4, so the gradient is −12 ÷ 4 = −3. Answer: −3. The distractors: 3 comes from subtracting the y-coordinates in one order and the x-coordinates in the other, giving 12 ÷ 4; −1/3 comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y instead of the other way round, giving 4 ÷ (−12); −6 comes from working out 3 − (−1) as 3 − 1 = 2, so that the change in y is divided by 2 rather than by 4.
- (d) 4.521 — x₁ = √(3 × 4 + 7) = √19 = 4.358898944. x₂ = √(3 × 4.358898944 + 7) = √20.076696833 = 4.480702716. x₃ = √(3 × 4.480702716 + 7) = √20.442108148 = 4.521294964, which rounds to 4.521. Mislabelling the starting value x₀ as x₁, so that the working stops one iteration too early, reports the true x₂ = 4.480702716, which rounds to 4.481. Working out one iteration too many reports the true x₄ = √(3 × 4.521294964 + 7) = 4.534741987, which rounds to 4.535. Applying the formula in the wrong order, calculating √(3xₙ) + 7 at every step instead of √(3xₙ + 7), gives, from x₀ = 4: √12 + 7 = 10.464101615, then √(3 × 10.464101615) + 7 = 12.602883619, then √(3 × 12.602883619) + 7 = 13.148873950, which rounds to 13.149.
- (b) x ≥ 5 — Expand the bracket: 2(3x − 1) = 6x − 2, so the inequality is 6x − 2 ≥ 4x + 8. Subtract 4x from both sides and add 2 to both sides: 2x ≥ 10. Divide both sides by 2: x ≥ 5. A candidate who only multiplies the 3x by 2 and forgets to multiply the −1 gets 6x − 1 ≥ 4x + 8, leading to x ≥ 4.5. A candidate who adds 4x instead of subtracting it gets 10x ≥ 10, leading to x ≥ 1. A candidate who multiplies by 2 instead of dividing gets x ≥ 20.
- (c) P — Sequence P has a common ratio of 2 (4 × 2 = 8, 8 × 2 = 16, 16 × 2 = 32), so it is geometric. Sequence Q has a common difference of 4, which is arithmetic, not geometric — a candidate who confuses a constant difference with a constant ratio picks Q. Sequence R has increasing differences of 3, 5, 7, a quadratic sequence, not geometric — a candidate who assumes any fast-growing sequence must be geometric picks R. Sequence S is the square numbers from 2² onwards (2², 3², 4², 5²), which is also quadratic, not geometric — a candidate who thinks squaring always means geometric growth picks S.
- (d) 16 boys and 14 girls — Method: write the number of boys in terms of the number of girls, then use the total for the class. Working: if there are g girls then there are g + 2 boys, so g + (g + 2) = 30, that is 2g + 2 = 30, so 2g = 28 and g = 14; the number of boys is 14 + 2 = 16. Answer: 16 boys and 14 girls, which total 30 and differ by 2. The distractors: 14 boys and 16 girls comes from substituting for the wrong group, writing b + (b + 2) = 30 and then calling b the number of boys; 15 boys and 15 girls comes from halving 30 and never using the difference; 17 boys and 13 girls comes from adding the whole 2 to one half of the class and taking the whole 2 off the other half, which leaves a difference of 4.
- (d) x₂ closer: f(x₂) = 0.0225, nearer to 0 — f(2.6) = 2.6² − 7 = 6.76 − 7 = −0.24, and f(2.65) = 2.65² − 7 = 7.0225 − 7 = 0.0225. The closer a value of x is to the root, the closer f(x) is to zero — regardless of sign. Since |0.0225| = 0.0225 is much smaller than |−0.24| = 0.24, x₂ = 2.65 is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: −0.24 is the smaller value' comes from comparing the SIGNED values of f(x) rather than their distances from zero — −0.24 is indeed less than 0.0225 as a number, but that does not mean x₁ is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: f(x₁) negative ⇒ nearer root' invents a rule that a negative f(x) means x is closer to the root; the sign of f(x) only tells you which side of the root x is on, not how close it is. 'x₂ is the exact root, since f(x₂) ≈ 0' misreads f(x₂) = 0.0225 as zero; the true root is √7 ≈ 2.6458, so f(2.65) is close to zero but not equal to it, and x₂ is an approximation, not the exact root.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.