Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) It has a solution between x = 2.2 and x = 2.3 — Since f(2.2) is negative and f(2.3) is positive, the graph of f crosses the x-axis somewhere between x = 2.2 and x = 2.3, so the equation has a solution in that interval. Choosing 'between x = −2.2 and x = −2.3' confuses the negative f-VALUE at 2.2 with a negative x-value. Choosing 'no solution' misreads a change of sign as meaning the opposite of what it shows. Choosing 'exactly two solutions' assumes a single change of sign must give two roots, which is not what the rule guarantees.
- (a) Yes — the gradients multiply to −2 × 1/2 = −1. — Rearrange Q into the form y = mx + c: 2y = x + 6 gives y = (1/2)x + 3, so Q has gradient 1/2. P has gradient −2. Two lines are perpendicular exactly when the product of their gradients is −1: −2 × 1/2 = −1. Since this holds, P and Q are perpendicular. Distractor routes: "the product is −1, but perpendicular needs 1" works out the product correctly but misremembers the condition — the perpendicular test is a product of exactly −1, and parallel lines are spotted by their gradients being equal, not by a product of 1. "Q's gradient is 2, and −2 × 2 = −4" comes from reading the 2 in front of y in 2y = x + 6 as the gradient, instead of dividing the whole equation by 2 first to reach y = (1/2)x + 3, where the gradient is 1/2. "Both equations have a negative x-term" is not a valid test at all — P's equation does have a negative x-term, but Q's, once rearranged, does not, and matching signs say nothing about the actual gradients.
- (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
- (c) (3, 9) — Reflecting in the horizontal line y = 2 keeps the x-coordinate the same and maps y to 2 × 2 − y = 4 − (−5) = 9, so S = (3, 9). A candidate who uses k − y instead of 2k − y gets 2 − (−5) = 7, giving (3, 7). A candidate who reflects in the x-axis instead of the line y = 2, simply changing the sign of y, gets (3, 5). A candidate who also changes the sign of the x-coordinate, as if reflecting in both axes, gets (−3, 9).
- (d) 8 — Working backwards by halving (undoing the doubling), one 4-hour step at a time: 9,600 (20 h) → 4,800 (16 h) → 2,400 (12 h) → 1,200 (8 h) → 600 (4 h) → 300 (0 h). Reading these in time order — 300, 600, 1,200, 2,400, 4,800, 9,600 at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 hours — the population is still at or below 1,000 at 4 hours (600) and first goes above 1,000 at 8 hours (1,200). So the recorded population first exceeds 1,000 at 8 hours. Answering 20 just reads off the time stated in the question, without working out when the threshold was actually first crossed — wrong, because 9,600 is only the value AT 20 hours, not necessarily the first time the population passed 1,000. Answering 0 comes from recovering the starting population by dividing 9,600 by 5 (the number of 4-hour gaps up to 20 hours) instead of by 2⁵ = 32 (the correct number of halvings), giving a wrongly-inflated starting value of 9,600 ÷ 5 = 1,920 — already above 1,000 at 0 hours — wrong, because doubling means the value must be halved five times, dividing by 2 five times (2⁵ = 32), not divided once by the number of gaps. Answering 12 comes from halving back only twice, from 9,600 to 4,800 (16 h) to 2,400 (12 h), and stopping there because 2,400 is already above 1,000, without checking that 1,200 at 8 hours is also above 1,000 and occurs earlier — wrong, because the FIRST recorded time above 1,000 is the earliest such time, not the first one reached while working backwards from 20 hours.
- (c) 6 — Method: substitute the value, work out the top of the fraction first, then the division, and add the 3 last. Working: the top gives 10 − 4 = 6, dividing by 2 gives 6 ÷ 2 = 3, and adding 3 gives 3 + 3 = 6. Answer: 6. The distractors: 11 comes from dividing only the 4 by 2 instead of the whole of the top, giving 10 − 2 + 3; 4.5 comes from dividing the + 3 by 2 as well, giving (10 − 4 + 3) ÷ 2; 0 comes from subtracting the wrong way round on the top, giving (4 − 10) ÷ 2 = −3 and then −3 + 3.
- (b) (3, 3) and (−1, −5) — Set the two expressions for y equal: x² − 6 = 2x − 3, which rearranges to x² − 2x − 3 = 0. Factorise: (x − 3)(x + 1) = 0, so x = 3 or x = −1. Substitute into the linear equation, y = 2x − 3: x = 3 gives y = 3; x = −1 gives y = −5. The points are (3, 3) and (−1, −5). Distractor routes: (3, 3) and (1, −1) comes from mis-factorising x² − 2x − 3 as (x − 3)(x − 1), giving a second root of 1 instead of −1. (3, 9) and (−1, 1) comes from finding the y-coordinate from y = x² instead of substituting back into the given line equation y = 2x − 3. (3, 3) alone stops after finding only the first root of the quadratic.
- (a) (4, −8), a minimum point — The transformation x → x + 1 inside f translates the graph 1 unit to the LEFT, so the x-coordinate becomes 5 − 1 = 4. The minus sign in front of f reflects the graph in the x-axis, so the y-coordinate becomes −8, and a reflection in the x-axis turns every maximum into a minimum, so (4, −8) is a minimum point. Writing '(4, −8), a maximum point' gets the coordinates right but forgets that a reflection in the x-axis swaps maximum and minimum points. Writing '(6, −8), a minimum point' comes from translating 1 unit to the RIGHT instead of the left — f(x + 1) always moves the graph in the negative x-direction. Writing '(4, 8), a minimum point' gets the x-coordinate and the type right, but forgets to actually negate the y-coordinate, even though it does correctly reclassify the point as a minimum.
- (a) It gets closer to zero but never actually reaches it. — y = 60 × (0.5)ˣ is always positive, however large x is, because a positive number raised to any power stays positive. As x increases, (0.5)ˣ gets smaller and smaller but never equals zero, so y approaches zero without ever reaching it. Believing the curve reaches zero when x = 60, because 60 is the starting value, mixes up the y-intercept with a stopping point — an exponential decay curve like this one never actually reaches the x-axis, so this is wrong. Believing the curve goes negative for large x is wrong because multiplying a positive number by (0.5) any number of times can never produce a negative result. Believing the curve levels off at y = 0.5, confusing the base of the exponential with its eventual level, is wrong: the base only controls how fast the curve falls, not where it settles — this curve settles at y = 0, not y = 0.5. Whenever you sketch an exponential decay curve, draw it approaching the x-axis but never touching it.
- (a) 48 litres — Split the area into three sections. The rectangle (t = 0 to 2) has area 2 × 12 = 24. The first trapezium (t = 2 to 5, parallel sides 12 and 3, width 3) has area 1/2 × (12 + 3) × 3 = 22.5. The second trapezium (t = 5 to 6, parallel sides 3 and 0, width 1) has area 1/2 × (3 + 0) × 1 = 1.5. Total volume: 24 + 22.5 + 1.5 = 48 litres. Forgetting the rectangle and adding only the two trapeziums gives 22.5 + 1.5 = 24 litres. Using a single trapezium across the whole 6 minutes, with parallel sides 12 and 0, ignoring that the first 2 minutes are constant, gives 1/2 × (12 + 0) × 6 = 36 litres. Correctly finding the rectangle and the first trapezium but forgetting to halve the second trapezium, using (3 + 0) × 1 = 3 instead of 1.5, gives 24 + 22.5 + 3 = 49.5 litres.
- (c) It has two different real solutions — Method: the discriminant is the quantity under the square root sign in the quadratic formula, so its sign decides how many real values the formula produces. Working: when the discriminant is positive its square root is a real number that is not zero, and the formula adds that root and subtracts it in turn, so the two results are different; a positive discriminant that is not a perfect square still gives two solutions, but they are not whole numbers. Answer: it has two different real solutions. The distractors: one repeated real solution is what a discriminant of zero gives, because adding and subtracting zero changes nothing; no real solutions is what a negative discriminant gives, because a negative number has no real square root; two whole-number solutions happens only when the discriminant is a perfect square and the division works out exactly, which a positive discriminant does not guarantee.
- (a) y = −2x + 3 — Method: find the step in the outputs for each step of 1 in the input — falling outputs mean a negative multiplier — then read off the output when the input is 0, because that is the number added on. Working: the outputs 5, 3, 1, −1 fall by 2 each time x rises by 1, so x is multiplied by −2; the output at x = 0 is 3, so 3 is added. Answer: y = −2x + 3, checked at x = 2 by −2 × 2 + 3 = −1. The distractors: y = 2x + 3 comes from taking the size of the step, 2, as the multiplier and ignoring the fact that the outputs are falling; y = −2x − 3 comes from using the correct multiplier but writing the number added on as −3 instead of the output 3 listed at x = 0; y = −x + 4 comes from taking the multiplier as −1, its size read from the step of 1 in the inputs instead of the step of 2 in the outputs and its sign from the fact that the outputs fall, and then fitting the number added on to the pair x = −1, y = 5.
- (d) 26 — Method: expand both brackets, treating the second as multiplication by −2 so that both of its terms change sign, then collect like terms. Working: 2(a + 6) = 2a + 12 and −2(a − 7) = −2a + 14, so the expression becomes 2a + 12 − 2a + 14; the a terms give 2a − 2a = 0, so no term in a survives, and the numbers give 12 + 14 = 26. Answer: 26. The distractors: −2 comes from expanding the second bracket as −2a − 14, so that the numbers give 12 − 14; 4a − 2 comes from adding 2(a − 7) instead of subtracting it, giving 2a + 12 + 2a − 14; 13 comes from multiplying the 2 over only the first term of each bracket, giving 2a + 6 − 2a + 7.
- (d) x = (y + 8) / 3 — Method: add 8 to both sides, then divide the whole side by 3. Working: y = 3x − 8, so adding 8 to both sides gives y + 8 = 3x, then dividing both sides by 3 gives x = (y + 8) / 3. The value x = y + 8 / 3 is Priya's version, which comes from dividing only the 8 by 3 instead of dividing the whole expression y + 8 by 3. The value x = (y − 8) / 3 comes from a sign error, keeping −8 instead of moving it to +8. The value x = 3(y + 8) comes from multiplying by 3 instead of dividing.
- (a) 4 — a₅ = a₄ + a₃, so a₄ = a₅ − a₃ = 29 − 11 = 18. a₄ = a₃ + a₂, so a₂ = a₄ − a₃ = 18 − 11 = 7. a₃ = a₂ + a₁, so a₁ = a₃ − a₂ = 11 − 7 = 4. Checking forwards: 4, 7, 11, 18, 29. Answering 7 stops one step early, reporting a₂ = 7 instead of continuing back one more step to a₁ — wrong, because the question asks for a₁, not a₂. Answering 18 reports a₄ = 18, an intermediate value found along the way, instead of a₁ — wrong, because a₄ is a term used to reach the answer, not the term the question asks for. Answering 3 takes one backward step too many, working out a further term a₀ = a₂ − a₁ = 7 − 4 = 3 — wrong, because the sequence starts at a₁, so a₁ = 4 is as far back as the question goes.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.