Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) {x : x ≤ −4} ∪ {x : x ≥ 4} — Rearrange so one side is zero: x² − 16 ≥ 0, then factorise: (x − 4)(x + 4) ≥ 0. The critical values are x = −4 and x = 4. Since the coefficient of x² is positive, the graph is a U-shape that is on or above the x-axis outside its roots, so the solution is x ≤ −4 or x ≥ 4, written as {x : x ≤ −4} ∪ {x : x ≥ 4}. Distractor routes: {x : −4 ≤ x ≤ 4} takes the region BETWEEN the roots, which is where x² − 16 is negative, the opposite region. {x : x ≥ 4} keeps only the positive square root and drops the negative branch entirely. {x : x ≤ 4} comes from a sign error, treating the inequality as if it were x² ≤ 16.
- (c) x = 0 — Expand (x + 4)² correctly: (x + 4)² = x² + 8x + 16. This equals x² + 16 only when 8x is zero, i.e. when x = 0 — at every other value of x the two expressions differ by 8x. Choosing x = 4 confuses the constant inside the bracket with the value of x that makes the expressions match. Choosing x = −4 makes the same confusion but with the sign flipped. Choosing x = 8 mistakes the coefficient of the middle term, 8x, for the value of x itself.
- (d) 50/3 — Method: call the smaller number x, write the larger number in terms of x and use the total. Working: the larger number is 2x, so x + 2x = 50, that is 3x = 50 and x = 50/3. Answer: 50/3, since 50/3 added to 100/3 makes 50 and 100/3 is twice 50/3. The distractors: 100/3 is the larger of the two numbers rather than the smaller one asked for; 25 comes from halving 50 and treating the two numbers as equal; 24 comes from reading 'twice the smaller number' as 'two more than the smaller number' and solving x + (x + 2) = 50.
- (a) −1/3 — The gradient of L is 3, the coefficient of x in y = mx + c form. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m. So the perpendicular gradient is −1/3. Distractor routes: 3 gives the gradient of L itself, forgetting to change it at all — that is the gradient of a PARALLEL line. 1/3 takes the reciprocal of 3 but keeps the same sign, missing the negative sign a perpendicular gradient requires. −3 negates the gradient of L but does not take its reciprocal, giving the gradient of a line with the opposite slope rather than a perpendicular one.
- (d) x² − 49 — Area = length × width = (x + 7)(x − 7). Expanding: x × x = x², x × (−7) = −7x, 7 × x = 7x, 7 × (−7) = −49. The two middle terms −7x and 7x cancel, leaving x² − 49. A candidate who misremembers the difference-of-two-squares result as a sum gets x² + 49. A candidate who makes a sign error and treats both middle terms as −7x instead of cancelling gets x² − 14x − 49. A candidate who confuses area with perimeter and simply adds the length and width gets 2x.
- (c) 26.6 — h² = 1.6² = 2.56, so B = 68 ÷ 2.56 = 26.5625, which rounds to 26.6 (1 d.p.). A candidate who forgets to square the height gets 68 ÷ 1.6 = 42.5. A candidate who squares the mass instead of the height gets 68² ÷ 1.6 = 2890.0. A candidate who truncates 26.5625 instead of rounding it gets 26.5.
- (c) The sequence diverges, moving away from x = 3 — Starting from x₀ = 2.9: x₁ = 2.9² − 6 = 2.41, x₂ = 2.41² − 6 = −0.19, x₃ = (−0.19)² − 6 = −5.96, x₄ = (−5.96)² − 6 = 29.56 — the values swing away from 3 and grow rapidly, so the sequence diverges rather than settling anywhere. Choosing 'settles towards x = 3' assumes that starting close to a root is enough for a rearrangement to converge to it, which is not always true — this rearrangement changes values too steeply near x = 3 to stay there. Choosing 'settles towards x = −2' assumes a diverging sequence must eventually land on the other root; instead it runs away to increasingly large values. Choosing 'stays constant at 2.9' ignores that applying the formula changes the value at every step.
- (b) 3/2 — Rearrange 2x + 3y = 6 into y = mx + c: 3y = −2x + 6, so y = −(2/3)x + 2. The gradient of this line is −2/3. The perpendicular gradient is the negative reciprocal: 3/2. Distractor routes: −1/2 comes from reading the gradient straight off the x-coefficient, 2, without dividing by the y-coefficient, 3, first, then taking its negative reciprocal. −3/2 correctly finds the gradient −2/3 but only takes its reciprocal without also changing the sign, giving −3/2 instead of 3/2. 2/3 comes from negating the gradient −2/3 to 2/3, but forgetting to also take the reciprocal.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (d) If the graph has two real roots, they are equal and opposite in value, so they sum to zero. — A turning point on the y-axis means the graph's axis of symmetry is the line x = 0, so any two roots must be symmetrical about x = 0 — equal in size but opposite in sign, summing to zero. The graph could still have no real roots, but that is not guaranteed just from the turning point's position, so the option claiming it must have none is too strong. The roots do not have to both be positive — if real, one is positive and one negative (or both are zero). The graph does not have to touch the x-axis at exactly one point either; it could cross at two symmetrical points, touch at one point, or miss the x-axis entirely.
- (c) Yes; x = (y + 5)/2 is right — Sam's method is correct throughout: adding 5 to both sides gives y + 5 = 2x, and dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 5)/2, so Sam is right. The option giving x = (y − 5)/2 assumes 5 should be subtracted again, but 2x − 5 = y means 5 has already been subtracted, so it must be added back, not taken away a second time. The option giving x = y/2 + 5 divides only the y term by 2 and leaves the 5 unhalved, which is not a valid rearrangement. The option agreeing Sam is correct but changing step 2 to x = 2(y + 5) confuses '2x' with 'x divided by 2' — since x is multiplied by 2, the inverse is division, not multiplication. Sam's working, and his final formula x = (y + 5)/2, are both correct.
- (d) (4, 3) — The sides are parallel to the axes: the missing vertex must share the y-coordinate 3 with (−2, 3) and the x-coordinate 4 with (4, −3), giving (4, 3). (−4, 3) comes from a sign error on the x-coordinate. (4, −9) comes from continuing the pattern of the given points by subtracting 6 from the y-coordinate again instead of matching it to (−2, 3). (3, 4) comes from swapping the x- and y-coordinates.
- (c) 1 — At x = 0, f(0) = 4. Applying the transformations in order — reflect in the x-axis first, then translate up by 5 — gives −f(0) + 5 = −4 + 5 = 1. Applying the translation but forgetting the reflection gives f(0) + 5 = 9. Applying the reflection to the whole expression, including the +5, gives −f(0) − 5 = −9. Applying the reflection but forgetting the translation gives −f(0) = −4.
- (d) 5n + 4 — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 14 − 9 = 5, 19 − 14 = 5, 24 − 19 = 5, so the terms increase by 5 each time and the nth term has the form 5n + c. Substituting n = 1: 5(1) + c = 9, so c = 4. Answer: the nth term is 5n + 4. The value 5n comes from leaving out the constant. The value 5n + 9 comes from using the first term as the constant directly, without subtracting the common difference first. The value 9n + 5 comes from swapping the roles of the first term and the common difference — using the first term, 9, as the coefficient of n and the difference, 5, as the constant.
- (c) 2.26 — Method: apply the formula repeatedly, keeping the whole display each time, and stop when two values in a row round to the same 2 decimal places; that shared rounded value is the solution to that accuracy. Working: x₁ = ∛(2 × 2 + 7) = ∛11 = 2.22398…; x₂ = ∛(2 × 2.22398… + 7) = ∛11.44796… = 2.25377…; x₃ = ∛11.50754… = 2.25767…; x₄ = ∛11.51534… = 2.25818…. Now x₃ and x₄ both round to 2.26, so the sequence has settled. Answer: 2.26. The distractors: 2.22 is x₁ rounded, quoted by a candidate who stops after one use of the formula; 2.25 is x₂ rounded, quoted by a candidate who stops as soon as two values look close instead of waiting until two consecutive values round to the same figure; 1.91 is ∛7, which comes from ignoring the 2x term and solving x³ = 7 instead.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.