Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 27 — Method: let the smaller number be n, so the larger number is n + 9. Form the equation n + (n + 9) = 45. Working: simplify: 2n + 9 = 45, so 2n = 36, giving n = 18. The larger number is 18 + 9 = 27. Answer: 27. 18 is the smaller number, found correctly, but given as the answer to the question asking for the larger number. 22.5 comes from ignoring the "9 more" part and simply halving the total, 45 ÷ 2. 36 comes from a sign error when isolating the constant, treating the equation as 2n = 45 + 9 instead of 2n = 45 − 9.
- (b) x = −3, y = −7 — x² + 6x + 2 = (x + 3)² − 3² + 2 = (x + 3)² − 7. Substituting x = −3: (−3)² = 9, 6 × (−3) = −18, so 9 − 18 + 2 = −7, confirming the minimum value −7 at x = −3: turning point (−3, −7). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket gives (x + 6)² − 34, turning point (−6, −34) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (3, −7) — wrong, because (x + 3)² is zero at x = −3, not x = 3. Computing 9 − 2 = 7 instead of 2 − 9 = −7 flips the sign of the constant, giving (−3, 7) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 2 minus 9, not 9 minus 2. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (d) (x − 8)(x + 8) — x² − 64 = x² − 8², a difference of two squares, which factorises as (x − 8)(x + 8). A candidate who treats it as a perfect square with a repeated negative factor gets (x − 8)(x − 8), which expands to x² − 16x + 64 — wrong on both the middle and constant terms. A candidate who uses a repeated positive factor gets (x + 8)(x + 8), which expands to x² + 16x + 64. A candidate who picks a different factor pair of 64, such as 4 and 16, without checking that the middle term cancels, gets (x − 4)(x + 16), which expands to x² + 12x − 64 — the wrong middle term.
- (a) x = 4 or x = −3 — Method: find two numbers that multiply to give −12 and add to give −1 — these are −4 and 3. So x² − x − 12 = (x − 4)(x + 3) = 0, giving x = 4 or x = −3. Distractor origins: x = −4 or x = 3 has the signs the wrong way round; x = 4 or x = 3 makes both roots positive, ignoring the sign of −12; x = 12 or x = −1 comes from reading off the coefficient and the constant directly instead of factorising.
- (d) 30° and 150° — The first solution is x = 30°, since sin 30° = 0.5. The graph of y = sin x is symmetrical about x = 90° between 0° and 180°, so the second solution is 180° − 30° = 150°. Adding 180° to the first solution instead of subtracting it from 180° gives 30° and 210°, but sin 210° = −0.5, not 0.5. Reflecting the first solution about x = 90° by adding 30° to 90° instead of subtracting from 180° gives 30° and 120°, but sin 120° = √3/2, not 0.5. Misremembering the standard value and using sin 45° = 0.5 instead of sin 30° = 0.5 gives 45° and 135°, but sin 45° = √2/2, not 0.5.
- (c) Week 16, £37,000 — y = f(x − 6) − 8000 combines a horizontal translation of 6 units RIGHT (subtracting 6 inside the brackets) with a vertical translation of £8000 DOWN (subtracting 8000 outside). Applying both to the maximum (10, 45000): 10 + 6 = 16, so the new maximum is in week 16. And 45000 − 8000 = 37000, so the maximum weekly profit is £37,000.
- (a) y = 2ˣ — An exponential graph y = 2ˣ passes through (0, 1) since 2⁰ = 1, rises more and more steeply for positive x, and has the x-axis as an asymptote as x becomes very negative, since 2ˣ gets closer to 0 without ever reaching it. y = x² + 1 also passes through (0, 1) and also rises steeply for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it rises to infinity too, rather than settling towards the x-axis — mistaking any curve that gets steeper for an exponential misses this. y = x³ + 1 passes through (0, 1) and rises for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it falls towards negative infinity rather than approaching the x-axis from above. y = 1 − x² also passes through (0, 1), but it falls for large positive x rather than rising — a candidate who checks only the y-intercept, without reading the described shape of the curve, could pick this.
- (b) 2x + 3 — fg(x) means f(g(x)): apply g first, then apply f to the result. g(x) = 2x, so f(g(x)) = f(2x) = 2x + 3. Writing 2x + 6 comes from working out gf(x) instead — g(f(x)) = g(x + 3) = 2(x + 3) = 2x + 6 — which applies the functions in the wrong order. Writing 3x + 3 comes from adding f(x) and g(x) together, (x + 3) + 2x = 3x + 3, instead of composing them. Writing 2x² + 6x comes from multiplying f(x) and g(x) together, (x + 3)(2x) = 2x² + 6x, instead of substituting one into the other.
- (b) x = 3, y = 4 — −x² + 6x − 5 = −(x² − 6x) − 5 = −[(x − 3)² − 9] − 5 = −(x − 3)² + 9 − 5 = −(x − 3)² + 4. Because the coefficient of x² is negative, −(x − 3)² is at most zero, so this turning point is a maximum. Substituting x = 3 gives (x − 3)² = 0, so y = 4, confirming the maximum value 4 at x = 3: turning point (3, 4). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket — forgetting to halve before completing the square — lands on turning point (6, 31), wrong, because only half the coefficient belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (−3, 4) — wrong, because (x − 3)² is zero at x = 3, not x = −3. Computing 5 − 9 = −4 instead of 9 − 5 = 4 flips the sign of the constant, giving (3, −4) — wrong, since the constant must be evaluated as 9 minus 5, not 5 minus 9. Whenever the leading coefficient is negative, the turning point is a maximum, not a minimum — check by substituting back into the original equation.
- (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
- (d) 47 — To reach the 8th term from the 1st term, the difference of 6 is added 7 times (8 − 1 = 7): 5 + 7 × 6 = 47. A candidate who multiplies by the term number itself, rather than one less, would compute 5 + 8 × 6 = 53. A candidate who uses one step too few (6 instead of 7) would reach 5 + 6 × 6 = 41. A candidate who forgets to include the first term at all would compute just 8 × 6 = 48.
- (a) x = −1.8 and x = 2.8 — Method: the solutions of x² − x − 2 = 3 are the x-coordinates of the points where the curve y = x² − x − 2 meets the line y = 3, read off the grid to 1 decimal place. Working: the curve meets the line y = 3 at approximately x = −1.8 and at x = 2.8. Answer: x ≈ −1.8 and x ≈ 2.8. Distractor refutation: x = −1.0 and x = 2.0 comes from reading where the curve crosses the x-axis (y = 0), solving x² − x − 2 = 0, instead of where it meets the line y = 3. x = −3.0 and x = 4.0 comes from taking the two ends of the drawn curve as the intersection points, instead of finding where it actually crosses the line y = 3. x = 1.8 and x = 2.8 comes from a sign slip on the left-hand intersection, reading it as positive instead of negative.
- (d) x ≤ 30 — Method: add the fixed cost to the cost of x balloons, set that total against the £150 limit with the sign that 'at most' calls for, then solve. Working: the total spend is 60 + 3x pounds, so 60 + 3x ≤ 150; subtracting 60 from both sides gives 3x ≤ 90; dividing both sides by 3, a positive number, gives x ≤ 30. Answer: x ≤ 30. The distractors: x ≤ 90 comes from taking the cake off the budget and stopping at 3x ≤ 90, reading the 90 as a number of balloons when it is the money left for them; x ≤ 50 comes from dividing the whole £150 by 3 and leaving the cake out of the calculation altogether; x ≥ 30 comes from reading 'at most' as 'at least', which reverses the condition.
- (b) y = −3x/4 + 25 — Method: a straight line that touches a circle at one point is a tangent there, so it is perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point; find the gradient of the radius, take its negative reciprocal, then substitute the point of contact into y − y₁ = m(x − x₁). Working: the radius from (0, 0) to (12, 16) has gradient 16 ÷ 12, which cancels to 4/3, so the tangent has gradient −3/4. Substituting gives y − 16 = −3/4(x − 12), so y − 16 = −3x/4 + 9 and y = −3x/4 + 25. Answer: y = −3x/4 + 25. The distractors: y = 3x/4 + 7 turns the gradient of the radius upside down but leaves it positive, so the perpendicular step is only half done; y = −4x/3 + 32 changes the sign of the radius gradient without turning it upside down, which is the other half left undone; y = −3x/4 − 25 uses the correct gradient but substitutes the point of contact with both signs reversed, writing y + 16 = −3/4(x + 12).
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.