Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 8 — Method: a circle centred on the origin has equation x² + y² = r², where r is the radius, so the number on the right-hand side is the square of the radius and not the radius itself. Working: comparing x² + y² = 64 with x² + y² = r² gives r² = 64, so r = √64 = 8. Answer: the radius is 8. The distractors: 64 is r² read straight off the equation as though the right-hand side were the radius, which is the commonest error on this form; 32 comes from halving 64, treating the right-hand side as a diameter that has to be halved; 16 is the diameter, 2 × 8, quoted in place of the radius.
- (b) x ≤ 4 — Method: undo the number subtracted from 3x first, then divide by 3; the direction of the sign changes only for division by a negative number. Working: adding 1 to both sides of 3x − 1 ≤ 11 gives 3x ≤ 12; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ 4. Answer: x ≤ 4. The distractors: x ≥ 4 comes from turning the sign round while dividing by 3; x ≤ 10/3 comes from subtracting 1 from both sides instead of adding it, giving 3x ≤ 10; x ≤ 12 comes from stopping at 3x ≤ 12 and reading off the 12 without dividing by 3.
- (a) (2n + 1) + (2n + 3) = 4n + 4 = 4(n + 1) — Two consecutive odd numbers can be written as 2n + 1 and 2n + 3, for a whole number n. Adding them: (2n + 1) + (2n + 3) = 4n + 4 = 4(n + 1), which is a multiple of 4 for every whole number n, proving the general result. Using 2n + 1 twice does not represent two different numbers, so it proves nothing about a sum of two numbers; writing n + (n + 2) drops the +1 that makes the numbers odd in the first place, and only shows a multiple of 2; and check every constant term is added correctly — 1 + 3 is 4, not 3.
- (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
- (c) x = 5, y = 5 — x² − 10x + 30 = (x − 5)² − 5² + 30 = (x − 5)² + 5. Substituting x = 5: 5² = 25, 10 × 5 = 50, so 25 − 50 + 30 = 5, confirming the minimum value 5 at x = 5: turning point (5, 5). Using −10 instead of half of it inside the bracket gives (x − 10)² − 70, turning point (10, −70) — wrong, because only half the coefficient of x belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (−5, 5) — wrong, because (x − 5)² is zero at x = 5, not x = −5. Computing 25 − 30 = −5 instead of 30 − 25 = 5 flips the sign of the constant, giving (5, −5) — wrong, since the completed square's constant must be evaluated as 30 minus 25, not 25 minus 30. Always check a turning point by substituting its x-value back into the original equation.
- (c) Wrong — the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. — Rearranging x − 2 = x² − 4x + 2 by moving every term across: 0 = x² − 4x + 2 − x + 2 = x² − 5x + 4. The candidate's x-term is wrong: combining −4x with the moved −x gives −4x − x = −5x, not −3x. So the correct equation is x² − 5x + 4 = 0. Distractor routes: "x² − 3x + 4 = 0 is correct" simply agrees with the candidate's sign error without checking it. "It should be x² − 5x − 4 = 0" correctly spots that something is wrong but blames the wrong term — the constant, 2 + 2 = 4, is correct; the error is in the x-term. "Subtracting is the same as adding" states something false: subtracting a term and adding it give different signs.
- (a) 33 — Substitute n=4 into 2n²+1: 2×4²+1=2×16+1=33. A candidate who computes n² as 2×n instead of n×n would compute 2×(2×4)+1=2×8+1=17. A candidate who correctly finds 2×16 but forgets to add the constant 1 would stop at 32. A candidate who squares the whole term 2n, rather than squaring n before multiplying by 2, would compute (2×4)²+1=64+1=65.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (b) 0.458 — x₁ = (0.4² + 3) ÷ 7 = 3.16 ÷ 7 = 0.4514 (unrounded, 0.451428...). x₂ = (x₁² + 3) ÷ 7 = (0.2038 + 3) ÷ 7 = 3.2038 ÷ 7 = 0.458 (3 d.p.). Choosing 0.632 divides only the 3 by 7 instead of dividing the whole sum x₁² + 3 by 7. Choosing 0.451 repeats the calculation for x₁ instead of moving on to x₂. Choosing 0.493 uses x₁ itself instead of x₁² inside the formula.
- (a) (−6, −3) — Reflecting in the y-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate and keeps the y-coordinate the same: (−6, −3). (6, 3) comes from reflecting in the x-axis instead, which changes the sign of the y-coordinate. (−6, 3) comes from reflecting in both axes. (6, −3) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (d) x² − 6x + 9 — Method: squaring a bracket means multiplying that bracket by itself, so expand (x − 3)(x − 3) term by term and then collect like terms. Working: x × x = x², x × (−3) = −3x, (−3) × x = −3x and (−3) × (−3) = 9, giving x² − 3x − 3x + 9, and the two middle terms collect to −6x. Answer: x² − 6x + 9. The distractors: x² − 3x + 9 comes from writing down only one of the two middle products instead of both; x² + 6x + 9 comes from treating (−3) × x as +3x, so the middle terms are added rather than subtracted; x² − 9 comes from treating the square as the difference of two squares (x − 3)(x + 3).
- (b) £105 — The hourly charge is 25 × 3 = £75. Adding the call-out fee: £75 + £30 = £105. A candidate who forgets the call-out fee gives just the hourly charge, £75. A candidate who adds the call-out fee to the hourly rate before multiplying by the hours, (30 + 25) × 3, gets £165. A candidate who multiplies the call-out fee by the number of hours instead of the hourly rate, 30 × 3, gets £90.
- (d) It crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. — y = x² − 9 factorises as (x − 3)(x + 3), since 9 = 3², so the curve crosses the x-axis at x = 3 and x = −3. Saying it crosses once at x = 9 mistakes the constant term for a root directly, without taking its square root. Saying it crosses at x = 9 and x = −9 makes the same mistake but adds a sign either way. Saying it does not cross the x-axis confuses the y-intercept, which is negative at (0, −9), with the number of times the curve meets the x-axis — a negative y-intercept combined with an upward-opening curve guarantees it crosses the x-axis twice.
- (c) The sequence diverges, moving away from x = 3 — Starting from x₀ = 2.9: x₁ = 2.9² − 6 = 2.41, x₂ = 2.41² − 6 = −0.19, x₃ = (−0.19)² − 6 = −5.96, x₄ = (−5.96)² − 6 = 29.56 — the values swing away from 3 and grow rapidly, so the sequence diverges rather than settling anywhere. Choosing 'settles towards x = 3' assumes that starting close to a root is enough for a rearrangement to converge to it, which is not always true — this rearrangement changes values too steeply near x = 3 to stay there. Choosing 'settles towards x = −2' assumes a diverging sequence must eventually land on the other root; instead it runs away to increasingly large values. Choosing 'stays constant at 2.9' ignores that applying the formula changes the value at every step.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.