Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) x = 6 or x = −4 — We need two numbers that multiply to −24 and add to −2: these are −6 and 4, since −6 × 4 = −24 and −6 + 4 = −2. So x² − 2x − 24 = (x − 6)(x + 4) = 0, giving x = 6 or x = −4. A candidate who swaps the signs, using 6 and −4 the wrong way round in the brackets, gets x = −6 or x = 4. A candidate who picks the wrong factor pair, 8 and −3 (which multiply to −24 but add to +5, not −2), gets (x + 8)(x − 3) = 0 and answers x = −8 or x = 3. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets x = −6 or x = −4, which would require the constant term to be +24, not −24.
- (b) 3n + 1 — Method: find how many more tiles each pattern uses, then find the constant by adjusting pattern 1's total. Working: each pattern uses 3 more tiles than the last, so the coefficient of n is 3. The constant is pattern 1's total minus the common difference: 4 − 3 = 1. Answer: the nth term is 3n + 1. 3n + 4 comes from using pattern 1's total, 4, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 3n − 2 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (4 − 3 − 3 = −2) instead of once. n + 3 comes from swapping the common difference and the constant.
- (c) 19 — Method: set up the equation 15 + 9n = 186, then subtract the deposit and divide by the cost per student. Working: 9n = 186 − 15 = 171; n = 171 ÷ 9 = 19. Answer: 19 students. 20.67 comes from dividing the whole £186 by £9 without first subtracting the deposit: 186 ÷ 9 ≈ 20.67. 11.8 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £9 and dividing by £15: (186 − 9) ÷ 15 = 11.8. 22.33 comes from adding the deposit instead of subtracting it: (186 + 15) ÷ 9 ≈ 22.33.
- (b) x = −4, y = −3 and x = 3, y = 4 — Substitute y = x + 1 into x² + y² = 25: x² + (x + 1)² = 25, which expands to x² + x² + 2x + 1 = 25, giving 2x² + 2x − 24 = 0, or x² + x − 12 = 0. Factorise: (x + 4)(x − 3) = 0, so x = −4 or x = 3. Using y = x + 1: when x = −4, y = −3; when x = 3, y = 4. Distractor routes: x = 4, y = 5 and x = −3, y = −2 comes from mis-factorising x² + x − 12 as (x − 4)(x + 3), reversing the sign of each root. x = −4, y = −3 alone stops after finding the first root of the quadratic and never goes back for the second pair. x = 12, y = 13 comes from misreading x² + y² = 25 as the linear equation x + y = 25 and solving that together with y = x + 1.
- (c) x = 2y + 10 — Method: undo the operations done to x in reverse order — add 5, then multiply by 2. Working: y = x/2 − 5, so y + 5 = x/2, so x = 2(y + 5) = 2y + 10. Answer: x = 2y + 10. x = 2y + 5 comes from multiplying only the x/2 term by 2 and forgetting to multiply the 5 as well. x = 2y − 10 comes from a sign error, subtracting 5 instead of adding it before multiplying by 2. x = (y + 5)/2 comes from dividing by 2 instead of multiplying, the wrong operation to undo a division.
- (d) The cost increases by about £10 per extra item — Gradient = change in cost ÷ change in items = (800 − 400) ÷ (70 − 30) = 400 ÷ 40 = 10. The units of the gradient are £ per item, so the cost is increasing by about £10 for every extra item produced, near x = 50. Subtracting in the wrong order, (400 − 800) ÷ (70 − 30) = −10, gives the right size but the wrong sign — check which point comes first each time. Leaving out the division by 40 gives £400 per item; dividing the wrong way round, 40 ÷ 400 = 0.1, gives £0.10 per item.
- (b) An identity, since both sides are equal for every x. — Expanding the left-hand side: 5(2x−3)=10x−15, which is exactly the same as the right-hand side for every value of x, so it is an identity, not an equation that is only true for one particular x. A candidate who treats every equals-sign statement as an equation, without checking whether it holds for all values of x, would choose the equation option. A candidate who mistakes it for a formula is assuming it relates two different letters or quantities, but only x appears — there is no second variable such as area or cost — so it is not a formula. A candidate who mistakes it for an inequality is assuming the two sides are only equal for particular values of x, but expanding shows they are identical for every value, not just some.
- (c) 5 — Method: call the number of years ago t, take t off both ages, and form an equation from the comparison at that time. Working: t years ago the father was 40 − t and Ethan was 10 − t, so 40 − t = 7(10 − t); expanding gives 40 − t = 70 − 7t, adding 7t to both sides gives 40 + 6t = 70, subtracting 40 gives 6t = 30, and dividing by 6 gives t = 5. Checking: five years ago the father was 35 and Ethan was 5, and 35 = 7 × 5. Answer: 5. The distractors: 35 comes from finding the right moment but giving the father's age at that time instead of the number of years; 30 comes from using Ethan's present age on the right-hand side, 40 − t = 7 × 10, which gives t = −30 and is then written as 30; 24 comes from reaching 6t = 30 correctly and subtracting 6 instead of dividing by 6.
- (d) 2x² − 4x + 3 — fg(x) means f(g(x)): substitute g(x) into f in place of x. g(x) = x − 1, so fg(x) = f(x − 1) = 2(x − 1)² + 1. Expanding (x − 1)² = x² − 2x + 1, so fg(x) = 2(x² − 2x + 1) + 1 = 2x² − 4x + 2 + 1 = 2x² − 4x + 3. Writing 2x² comes from working out gf(x) instead — g(f(x)) = f(x) − 1 = (2x² + 1) − 1 = 2x², which applies the functions in the wrong order. Writing 2x² − 1 comes from expanding (x − 1)² as x² − 1, dropping the middle term, so f(x − 1) becomes 2(x² − 1) + 1 = 2x² − 2 + 1 = 2x² − 1. Writing 2x² − 4x + 2 comes from expanding correctly but forgetting the final + 1 from f, stopping at 2(x² − 2x + 1) = 2x² − 4x + 2.
- (c) 21.6 — m² = (−2.4)² = 5.76, since a negative number squared is positive, so 5m² = 28.8. Then 3m = 3 × (−2.4) = −7.2. Total: 28.8 + (−7.2) = 21.6. −36 comes from taking m² as negative, 5 × (−5.76) − 7.2 = −36, forgetting that squaring removes the negative sign. 36 comes from ignoring the negative sign on m altogether and using m = 2.4 throughout. 29.4 comes from treating 3m as 3 + m instead of 3 × m, giving 28.8 + (3 + (−2.4)).
- (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
- (d) x = 6 — Method: with an unknown on both sides, first collect the x terms on one side by subtracting the smaller x term from both sides, then deal with the numbers. Working: subtracting x from both sides gives x + 7 = 13, and subtracting 7 from both sides gives x = 6. Answer: x = 6. The distractors: x = 20 comes from adding 7 to 13 instead of subtracting it once the x terms have been collected; x = 2 comes from collecting the x terms by adding them, giving 3x + 7 = 13 and then 3x = 6; x = −6 comes from subtracting 2x from both sides to get 7 = −x + 13, reaching −6 = −x and then copying the sign straight across instead of dividing by −1.
- (d) An equation, true for one value of x — 2x + 5 = 17 is only true when x = 6, so it is an equation. A candidate who ignores the equals sign and focuses only on the x terms and numbers present picks the expression option. A candidate who sees an equals sign and assumes it must relate two different quantities, as a formula does, picks that option, missing that there is only one quantity, x, involved here. A candidate who wrongly checks whether both sides look similar in structure rather than testing specific values picks the identity option, missing that the two sides are not equal for every value of x.
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (a) 11 — Method: work out each term separately using the rule n² − 3, then subtract. Working: 6th term = 6² − 3 = 36 − 3 = 33. 5th term = 5² − 3 = 25 − 3 = 22. Difference: 33 − 22 = 11. Answer: 11. 8 comes from subtracting the constant −3 once at the end instead of it already being included in both terms, (36 − 25) − 3. 1 comes from working out (6 − 5)² instead of finding 6² and 5² separately and then subtracting. −11 comes from subtracting in the wrong order, the 5th term minus the 6th term instead of the 6th minus the 5th.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.