Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 23 — Method: let the smallest integer be n, so the three consecutive integers are n, n + 1 and n + 2. Form the equation n + (n + 1) + (n + 2) = 72. Working: simplify the left side: 3n + 3 = 72, so 3n = 69, giving n = 23. Answer: 23. 24 comes from dividing 72 by 3 directly, 72 ÷ 3 = 24, which finds the middle integer rather than realising the three numbers differ. 25 comes from correctly finding n = 23 but reading off the largest integer, n + 2, instead of the smallest as asked. 21 comes from dividing first and subtracting after, (72 ÷ 3) − 3, instead of subtracting 3 before dividing by 3.
- (a) 23 — The number of logs increases by 4 for each layer down, starting from 3 in the top layer, so the nth layer has 3+(n−1)×4 logs. For the 6th layer: 3+5×4=3+20=23. A candidate who adds the difference of 4 six times instead of five, treating the top layer as needing an addition too, would compute 3+6×4=27. A candidate who uses 4n instead of 4n−1, omitting the adjustment for the first layer, would compute 4×6=24. A candidate who subtracts the common difference, 4, instead of 1 when adjusting the multiplier would compute 4×6−4=20.
- (d) 8 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 2000 + 800(n − 1), and find the smallest whole n for which it is greater than 7000. Working: 2000 + 800(n − 1) > 7000, so 800(n − 1) > 5000, giving n − 1 > 6.25. Since n − 1 must be a whole number, the smallest value is 7, so n = 8. Check: year 8's total is 2000 + 800 × 7 = 7600, which is more than £7000, while year 7's total is 2000 + 800 × 6 = 6800, which is not. Answer: year 8. 7 comes from rounding 6.25 to the nearest whole number, 6, and then adding 1, instead of rounding up to the next whole number before adding 1. 6 comes from using 6.25 rounded down to 6 as the year number directly, without adding the 1 needed to convert from the number of increases to the year number. 9 comes from adding one extra year beyond the year that already satisfies the condition.
- (d) x = 4 and x = −4 — Substituting y = 3 gives x² + 9 = 25, which simplifies to x² = 16, so x = 4 or x = −4. Choosing 'x = 3 and x = −3' uses the given value y = 3 as if it were the x-coordinate. Choosing 'x = 4' alone finds the positive square root of 16 but forgets the negative root. Choosing 'x = 5 and x = −5' skips subtracting 3² = 9 from 25 and takes the square root of 25 directly.
- (b) 158 minutes — Rearranging C = 15 + 0.2m for m: subtract 15 from both sides to get C − 15 = 0.2m, then divide by 0.2: m = (C − 15)/0.2. Substituting C = 46.60: m = (46.60 − 15)/0.2 = 31.60/0.2 = 158. Answering 233 minutes comes from dividing the whole £46.60 by 0.2 without first taking off the £15 fixed charge. Answering 308 minutes comes from adding the £15 instead of subtracting it: (46.60 + 15)/0.2. Answering 218 minutes divides first and subtracts 15 afterwards, in the wrong order: 46.60/0.2 − 15 = 233 − 15 = 218. Ali made 158 minutes of calls.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (c) Wrong — the product is −4/25, not −1. — The student's rearrangement is correct: 5y = −2x + 15 gives y = −(2/5)x + 3, gradient −2/5. But the test for perpendicularity is that the product of the two gradients equals exactly −1, not merely that it is negative. Here 2/5 × (−2/5) = −4/25, which is not −1, so the lines are NOT perpendicular. Distractor routes: "a negative product always means perpendicular" states a rule that does not exist — many pairs of lines have a negative gradient product without being perpendicular, as this pair shows. "The rearrangement is incorrect" wrongly blames a correct step; 5y = −2x + 15 does rearrange to y = −(2/5)x + 3. "2/5 and −2/5 are negatives of each other" notices a true but irrelevant fact — being negatives of each other is not the perpendicularity condition; an exact product of −1 is.
- (a) {x : x < −3} ∪ {x : x ≥ 1} — "Less than −3" stays strict, since the wording never says "or equal to": x < −3. "Greater than or equal to 1" is inclusive: x ≥ 1. These are two separate, non-overlapping ranges joined with "or", so in set notation they are combined with the union symbol: {x : x < −3} ∪ {x : x ≥ 1}. Distractor routes: {x : x ≤ −3} ∪ {x : x > 1} swaps the strict and inclusive signs, marking −3 as included and 1 as excluded, the opposite of the wording. {x : −3 < x ≤ 1} treats "or" as "and", joining the two conditions into one continuous interval between the values instead of a union of two separate ranges. {x : x > −3} ∪ {x : x ≤ 1} reverses both inequality directions; the two reversed ranges then overlap and between them cover every number on the number line, so that set is the whole of the real line rather than the two separate ranges the description asks for.
- (a) 7 — Multiply the input by 2: 6 × 2 = 12. Then subtract 5: 12 − 5 = 7. A candidate who does the operations in the wrong order, subtracting 5 first and then multiplying by 2, gets (6 − 5) × 2 = 2. A candidate who only carries out the multiplication and forgets to subtract gets 12. A candidate who adds 5 instead of subtracting gets 6 × 2 + 5 = 17.
- (b) y decreases towards zero but never reaches it — Method: as x gets larger, dividing 20 by a bigger number gives a smaller result, so y decreases; because 20/x can never be exactly zero for any positive x, the curve gets closer to zero without ever reaching it, so y decreases towards zero but never reaches it. Distractor origins: 'y increases towards a limit but never reaches it' has the relationship backwards, treating y as increasing when it is actually decreasing; 'y decreases at a steady rate and reaches zero' wrongly assumes the graph behaves like a straight line that eventually hits zero; 'y stays the same however large x becomes' wrongly assumes there is no change in y at all.
- (a) 2x − 1 — Swap x and y: x = (y + 1)/2. Multiply both sides by 2: 2x = y + 1. Subtract 1 from both sides: y = 2x − 1, so f⁻¹(x) = 2x − 1. Writing 2x + 1 comes from not flipping the sign on the 1 when it is moved across the equals sign. Writing (x − 1)/2 comes from reversing the sign of the 1 but leaving the ÷2 from the original rule in place, instead of turning it into ×2. Writing x/2 − 1 comes from dividing only the x by 2 and treating the 1 as already outside the fraction.
- (c) x = 0 or x = 3 — Method: take out the common factor 5x: 5x(x − 3) = 0, so 5x = 0 or x − 3 = 0, giving x = 0 or x = 3. Distractor origins: x = 0 or x = 15 comes from forgetting to divide the second term by the common factor 5x correctly, leaving 15 instead of 3; x = 3 loses the solution x = 0 by dividing both sides by x; x = 5 or x = 3 mistakes the coefficient 5 itself for one of the solutions.
- (c) Fastest at t = 2 min — steepest gradient. — The rate of cooling is given by the size (magnitude) of the gradient, ignoring its sign — the steeper the tangent, the faster the temperature is changing. Of −8, −3 and −0.5, the gradient −8 has the greatest magnitude, so the tea is cooling fastest at t = 2 minutes. 'Fastest at t = 20 min — largest gradient' confuses the signed value with the size of the rate: −0.5 is the largest NUMBER of the three, but it's the smallest in magnitude, meaning the tea is barely cooling at all by then. 'Cools at the same rate throughout' ignores that the three gradients are different sizes, not just all negative. 'Fastest at t = 10 min — the middle reading' isn't a mathematical reason at all — the gradients themselves have to be compared, not their position in the list.
- (b) 4 — Method: form the equation 30 + 25h = 130, where h is the number of hours, then solve for h. Working: subtract the call-out fee from the total bill: 25h = 130 − 30 = 100. Divide by the hourly rate: h = 100 ÷ 25 = 4. Answer: 4 hours. 5.2 comes from dividing the whole bill by the hourly rate without subtracting the fixed fee first, 130 ÷ 25. 3.5 comes from swapping the fee and the rate, subtracting the rate from the bill and dividing by the fee, (130 − 25) ÷ 30. 6.4 comes from adding the call-out fee to the bill instead of subtracting it, before dividing by the rate, (130 + 30) ÷ 25.
- (a) 271 m — The reading at t = 12 isn't in the table, so it must be interpolated between t = 10 (35 m/s) and t = 14 (27 m/s): the velocity falls by 8 m/s over the 4-second gap, so over 2 seconds it falls by 4 m/s, giving 35 − 4 = 31 m/s. The trapezium rule then uses three strips of unequal width, 4, 6 and 2 seconds, with areas of 40, 165 and 66: 40 + 165 + 66 = 271 m. Writing 267 m comes from skipping the interpolation and using the table's t = 14 reading, 27, directly as the height at t = 12. Writing 282 m comes from treating all three strips as though they were 4 seconds wide, instead of using the true gaps of 4, 6 and 2 seconds between the readings. Writing 275 m comes from using the t = 10 reading, 35, at both ends of the final strip, instead of interpolating a new value at t = 12.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.