Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 7.9 m — Method: the iteration converges on the width of the plot, so run the formula three times from the starting value and then add 4 m, because the length is 4 m greater than the width. Working: x₁ = √(30 − 4 × 3) = √18 = 4.24264…; x₂ = √(30 − 4 × 4.24264…) = √13.02943… = 3.60963…; x₃ = √(30 − 4 × 3.60963…) = √15.56147… = 3.94480…. The estimate for the length is 3.94480… + 4 = 7.94480…, which is 7.9 m correct to 1 decimal place. Answer: 7.9 m. The iteration is still oscillating at x₃, so this is the estimate that three uses of the formula give, not a settled value. The distractors: 3.9 m is x₃ itself, the width, given by a candidate who runs the iteration correctly and then stops before the step the question actually asks for; 7.6 m uses x₂ in place of x₃, one use of the formula short, and then adds the 4 m correctly; 15.8 m multiplies the width by 4 instead of adding 4 m to it, reading greater than as a multiplier.
- (c) −0.5 — fg(x) = f(g(x)) = f(x²) = x² + 2. gf(x) = g(f(x)) = g(x + 2) = (x + 2)² = x² + 4x + 4. Setting fg(x) = gf(x): x² + 2 = x² + 4x + 4. Subtract x² from both sides: 2 = 4x + 4. Subtract 4 from both sides: −2 = 4x, so x = −0.5. Writing 1.5 comes from adding the 4 instead of subtracting it: 4x = 2 + 4 = 6, giving x = 1.5. Writing 'no solution' comes from expanding (x + 2)² as x² + 4 using (a + b)² = a² + b², losing the middle term — the equation then reads x² + 2 = x² + 4, which has no solution, but the expansion itself is wrong. Writing 0 comes from treating gf(x) as g(x) + f(x) instead of g(f(x)): x² + (x + 2) = x² + 2 gives x = 0, but that adds the two functions rather than composing them.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (d) The cost increases by about £10 per extra item — Gradient = change in cost ÷ change in items = (800 − 400) ÷ (70 − 30) = 400 ÷ 40 = 10. The units of the gradient are £ per item, so the cost is increasing by about £10 for every extra item produced, near x = 50. Subtracting in the wrong order, (400 − 800) ÷ (70 − 30) = −10, gives the right size but the wrong sign — check which point comes first each time. Leaving out the division by 40 gives £400 per item; dividing the wrong way round, 40 ÷ 400 = 0.1, gives £0.10 per item.
- (b) 20 — a²b means a² multiplied by b: a² = 2² = 4, and 4 × 5 = 20. Reading the expression as (ab)² instead of a²b gives (2 × 5)² = 100. Squaring b instead of a, 2 × 5² = 50, squares the wrong letter. Adding a² and b instead of multiplying them, 2² + 5 = 9, uses the wrong operation.
- (d) L/6 − 4 — Method: find the length of one equal piece first (divide by 6), then apply the later change (subtract 4) to that piece. Working: one piece is L/6 metres; removing 4 metres from it gives L/6 − 4. Answer: L/6 − 4. L/6 + 4 comes from adding the 4 metres instead of removing it. (L − 4)/6 comes from removing the 4 metres from the whole rope before cutting it into pieces, the wrong order. 4 − L/6 comes from subtracting the piece length from 4 instead of the other way round.
- (a) 8 — f(x − 1) means every input to f is reduced by 1 before it is looked up. At x = 2, the input to f becomes 2 − 1 = 1, so f(x − 1) at x = 2 is f(1) = 8. Reading f(2) = 4 directly from the table, without applying the shift, gives 4. Shifting in the wrong direction, using x + 1 = 3 instead of x − 1 = 1, gives f(3) = 1. Confusing f(x − 1) with f(x) − 1 — taking f(2) = 4 and then subtracting 1 — gives 3.
- (a) 9 — Method: the gaps in this sequence are not constant, so work out each of the two terms named from the rule and then subtract the earlier from the later. Working: the 5th term is 5² + 1 = 25 + 1 = 26 and the 4th term is 4² + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17, so the difference is 26 − 17. Answer: 9. The distractors: 7 comes from using the 3rd and 4th terms, one position too early, 17 − 10; 11 comes from using the 5th and 6th terms, one position too late, 37 − 26; 1 comes from subtracting the position numbers, 5 − 4, instead of the terms themselves.
- (a) 7n + 4 — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 18 − 11 = 7, 25 − 18 = 7, 32 − 25 = 7, so the terms increase by 7 each time and the nth term has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 11, so c = 4. Answer: the correct nth term is 7n + 4. The value 7n is Ravi's value, which comes from using only the common difference and leaving out the constant. The value 7n + 11 comes from using the first term as the constant directly, without subtracting the common difference first. The value 11n + 7 comes from swapping the roles of the first term and the common difference — using the first term, 11, as the coefficient of n and the difference, 7, as the constant.
- (a) Yes — the gradients multiply to −2 × 1/2 = −1. — Rearrange Q into the form y = mx + c: 2y = x + 6 gives y = (1/2)x + 3, so Q has gradient 1/2. P has gradient −2. Two lines are perpendicular exactly when the product of their gradients is −1: −2 × 1/2 = −1. Since this holds, P and Q are perpendicular. Distractor routes: "the product is −1, but perpendicular needs 1" works out the product correctly but misremembers the condition — the perpendicular test is a product of exactly −1, and parallel lines are spotted by their gradients being equal, not by a product of 1. "Q's gradient is 2, and −2 × 2 = −4" comes from reading the 2 in front of y in 2y = x + 6 as the gradient, instead of dividing the whole equation by 2 first to reach y = (1/2)x + 3, where the gradient is 1/2. "Both equations have a negative x-term" is not a valid test at all — P's equation does have a negative x-term, but Q's, once rearranged, does not, and matching signs say nothing about the actual gradients.
- (c) x + 18 — Expand −3(2x − 6) by multiplying both terms by −3: −3 × 2x = −6x and −3 × (−6) = 18, giving 7x − 6x + 18 = x + 18. Writing x − 18 comes from not flipping the sign of the −6 inside the bracket, so −3 × (−6) is treated as −18 instead of +18. Writing x + 6 comes from forgetting to multiply the −6 by 3, only carrying its sign. Writing 13x − 18 comes from treating the whole bracket as being added rather than subtracted, so 3(2x − 6) = 6x − 18 is added to 7x.
- (d) Wrong — the correct solution is x < −3 or x > 3. — Squaring or unsquaring an inequality is not a safe one-step move: the solution must be split into two branches, since a number less than −3 also squares to more than 9. So x > 3 finds only half the solution set. The full answer is x < −3 or x > 3. Distractor routes: "Right — square rooting both sides gives x > 3" treats the square root of an inequality the same as the square root of an equation and misses the negative branch entirely. "Wrong — the correct solution is −3 < x < 3" applies the between-the-roots pattern that belongs to the opposite inequality, x² < 9. "Right, but x = −3 and x = 3 should also work" treats the inequality as if it also allowed equality, when x² > 9 is strict and excludes both x = 3 and x = −3.
- (d) (6, 6) — y = f(x − 4) + 1 combines two translations: the −4 inside the brackets moves the graph 4 units to the RIGHT, and the +1 outside the brackets moves it 1 unit UP. Applying both to (2, 5): add 4 to the x-coordinate 2, and add 1 to the y-coordinate 5, giving (6, 6). Moving left instead of right, as the minus sign inside the bracket might suggest, gives (−2, 6) or (−2, 4); forgetting the horizontal shift altogether and only applying the vertical one gives (2, 6).
- (a) (3, 7) — y = f(x) + 5 is a vertical translation of y = f(x) by 5 units up — the translation vector is (0, 5) — so only the y-coordinate of any point changes. Turning point (3, 2) → (3, 2 + 5) = (3, 7). Adding the 5 to the x-coordinate, or treating it as a horizontal shift like y = f(x + 5), moves the wrong coordinate — check first whether the number sits inside or outside the brackets.
- (a) −1/3 — The gradient of L is 3, the coefficient of x in y = mx + c form. The gradient of a line perpendicular to a line of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1/m. So the perpendicular gradient is −1/3. Distractor routes: 3 gives the gradient of L itself, forgetting to change it at all — that is the gradient of a PARALLEL line. 1/3 takes the reciprocal of 3 but keeps the same sign, missing the negative sign a perpendicular gradient requires. −3 negates the gradient of L but does not take its reciprocal, giving the gradient of a line with the opposite slope rather than a perpendicular one.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.