Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 10 — Check n = 9: a₉ = 3 × 2⁸ = 3 × 256 = 768, below 1,000. Check n = 10: a₁₀ = 3 × 2⁹ = 3 × 512 = 1,536, above 1,000. So the first term greater than 1,000 is at position n = 10. Answering 9 comes from forgetting the −1 shift and using the formula as 3 × 2ⁿ instead of 3 × 2ⁿ⁻¹: checking 3 × 2⁹ = 1,536 (which exceeds 1,000) but then reporting the position as n = 9, the exponent used, instead of n = 10 — wrong, because the exponent in the real formula is n − 1, not n. Answering 11 comes from going one term too far: correctly finding that a₁₀ already exceeds 1,000, but then checking one position further and reporting n = 11 instead of stopping at the first position that already works — wrong, because n = 11 is not the FIRST term greater than 1,000. Answering 1,536 gives the VALUE of the term (a₁₀ itself) rather than its position — wrong, because the question asks which term it is (the value of n), not what that term is worth.
- (d) Overestimate — the curve bends upward (convex). — The first differences of the speeds are 3, 5, 7 and 9, so the second differences are 2, 2 and 2 — constant and positive, which means the speed-time graph curves upwards (is convex). On a convex curve, each straight chord used by the trapezium rule lies above the curve, so the trapezium rule overestimates the true distance. 'Underestimate — the curve bends upward' states the same correct geometry but gets the conclusion backwards — a chord above the curve means too much area is counted, not too little. 'Overestimate — the speed values are increasing' uses the wrong evidence: increasing speed alone doesn't tell you whether the curve bends up or down, only the second differences do. 'Underestimate — second differences are constant' confuses a constant second difference with a steady rate of change in speed, which isn't what the second difference of a speed-time table measures.
- (b) It is not even an ordinary equation with a solution: expanding the left-hand side gives 3x − 12, and 3x − 12 = 3x − 4 would require −12 = −4, which is never true. — Expanding the left-hand side, 3(x − 4) = 3x − 12. Setting this equal to the right-hand side, 3x − 12 = 3x − 4, gives −12 = −4 once the 3x terms are removed from both sides — a statement that is never true, so no value of x satisfies the equation at all, and it is certainly not an identity. The option about substituting a specific value misunderstands algebraic expansion, which holds for every x, not one chosen value. The option matching the first term wrongly assumes that is enough to prove equivalence. The option about multiplying the 4 by 3 on both sides is nonsensical, since there is only one bracket to expand, on the left-hand side.
- (c) 71 — Method: square x first, then multiply by 3, then subtract 4, following the order of operations. Working: x² = 5² = 25; 3 × 25 = 75; 75 − 4 = 71. Answer: 71. 221 comes from squaring (3x) as a whole first: (3 × 5)² = 225, then − 4 = 221, squaring the coefficient along with x. 75 comes from correctly working out 3x² but forgetting to subtract the 4. 3 comes from subtracting the 4 from x before squaring: (5 − 4)² × 3 = 3, doing the operations in the wrong order.
- (b) x = (y − 3)/5 — To make x the subject of y = 5x + 3, first subtract 3 from both sides to get y − 3 = 5x, then divide both sides by 5: x = (y − 3)/5. Writing x = (y + 3)/5 keeps the division correct but does not change the sign of the 3 when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 − 3 divides only the y term by 5 and leaves the 3 as a separate subtraction, instead of subtracting first and dividing the whole expression. Writing x = 5(y − 3) applies the correct order of subtracting 3 first, but then multiplies by 5 instead of dividing — the inverse of 5x is division, not multiplication. The correct rearrangement is x = (y − 3)/5.
- (a) 12 — Method: write both ages as they were six years ago, call Leo's present age x, and form an equation from the comparison at that time. Working: six years ago Harry was 24 − 6 = 18 and Leo was x − 6, so 18 = 3(x − 6); expanding gives 18 = 3x − 18, adding 18 to both sides gives 36 = 3x, and dividing by 3 gives x = 12. Checking: six years ago Harry was 18 and Leo was 6, and 18 = 3 × 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 6 comes from solving 18 = 3(x − 6) as far as Leo's age six years ago, 18 ÷ 3 = 6, and giving that as his age now; 8 comes from dividing Harry's present age by 3, 24 ÷ 3 = 8, using the multiple at the wrong moment in time; 36 comes from stopping at 3x = 36 and giving 36 as Leo's age.
- (a) 3 — y = f(x + 2) is f(x) translated 2 units to the LEFT (inside the bracket, adding moves the graph in the negative x-direction). The root moves with the whole graph: 5 − 2 = 3. Moving right instead of left gives 7; assuming a bracket shift leaves the root unchanged gives 5; writing down the shift amount 2 itself skips the translation altogether.
- (a) 8 — f(x − 1) means every input to f is reduced by 1 before it is looked up. At x = 2, the input to f becomes 2 − 1 = 1, so f(x − 1) at x = 2 is f(1) = 8. Reading f(2) = 4 directly from the table, without applying the shift, gives 4. Shifting in the wrong direction, using x + 1 = 3 instead of x − 1 = 1, gives f(3) = 1. Confusing f(x − 1) with f(x) − 1 — taking f(2) = 4 and then subtracting 1 — gives 3.
- (c) x = 0, y = 3 and x = 3, y = 0 — Substitute y = 3 − x into x² + y² = 9: x² + (3 − x)² = 9. Expanding (3 − x)² = 9 − 6x + x² gives x² + 9 − 6x + x² = 9, which simplifies to 2x² − 6x = 0, or 2x(x − 3) = 0, so x = 0 or x = 3. Using y = 3 − x: x = 0 gives y = 3; x = 3 gives y = 0. Distractor routes: x = 0, y = 3 alone stops after the factor 2x = 0 and never checks the second factor, x − 3 = 0. x = 0, y = 3 and x = −3, y = 6 comes from factorising 2x² − 6x as 2x(x + 3), a sign error that gives a second root of −3 instead of 3. x = 0, y = 3 and x = 6, y = −3 comes from expanding (3 − x)² as 9 − 6x, dropping the x² term, which changes the quadratic to x² − 6x = 0 and its second root to 6.
- (d) 680 m — First find how long the acceleration takes: acceleration = change in speed ÷ time, so 2.5 = 20 ÷ t, giving t = 20 ÷ 2.5 = 8 seconds. The distance during this phase is the area of a triangle with base 8 and height 20: 1/2 × 8 × 20 = 80 m. The distance during the constant-speed phase is 20 × 30 = 600 m, since distance = speed × time at a constant speed. The total distance is 80 + 600 = 680 m. Using the given 30 seconds for the acceleration phase as well, 1/2 × 30 × 20 = 300, plus the correct 600, gives 900 m — but 30 seconds is only stated for the constant-speed phase. Leaving out the 1/2 and using the full rectangle for the acceleration phase, 8 × 20 = 160, plus the correct 600, gives 760 m — the speed is not constant during acceleration, so this area is a triangle, not a rectangle. Swapping the two times round, and using 8 seconds for the constant-speed distance instead of 30, 20 × 8 = 160, plus the correct triangle area of 80, gives 240 m.
- (d) x = 4 or x = −4 — Method: divide both sides by 2 to get x² = 16, then take the square root of both sides: x = 4 or x = −4. Distractor origins: x = 4 forgets the negative root; x = 8 comes from halving 16 instead of taking its square root; x = 16 stops at x² = 16 without ever taking the square root.
- (c) 2.61 — The limit L satisfies L = 12 ÷ (L + 2), so L(L + 2) = 12, giving L² + 2L − 12 = 0 and L = (−2 + √52) ÷ 2 = 2.6056, which is 2.61 to 2 decimal places (the early iterates 4, 2, 3, 2.4, 2.73, ... oscillate around this value before settling). Choosing 3.00 reads off x₃, one of the early oscillating values, before the sequence has settled close to the limit. Choosing 4.00 reads off x₁, the very first iterate, not the value the sequence approaches. Choosing 6.00 comes from writing the limit equation as L = 12 ÷ 2, leaving L itself out of the denominator.
- (a) 2.55 — x₁ = 20 ÷ (2 + 5) = 20 ÷ 7 = 2.857142857. x₂ = 20 ÷ (2.857142857 + 5) = 20 ÷ 7.857142857 = 2.545454545, which rounds to 2.55. Reporting x₁ instead of x₂ gives 2.857142857, which rounds to 2.86. Dropping the +5 in the denominator, using xₙ₊₁ = 20 ÷ xₙ, gives x₁ = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 and x₂ = 20 ÷ 10 = 2, which is 2.00. A sign error in the denominator, using xₙ₊₁ = 20 ÷ (xₙ − 5), gives x₁ = 20 ÷ (2 − 5) = −6.666666667 and x₂ = 20 ÷ (−6.666666667 − 5) = −1.714285714, which rounds to −1.71.
- (d) Yes: the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. — Method: find the 8th term by subtracting 8 a total of 7 times from the first term, since the 1st term itself needs 0 subtractions. Working: 8th term = 50 − 8 × 7 = 50 − 56 = −6, which is negative, so Priya is correct. Answer: Yes, the 8th term is 50 − 8 × 7 = −6, which is negative. The "50 − 8 × 6 = 2" option subtracts 8 only six times instead of seven, an off-by-one error in counting the steps. The "50 − 8 × 8 = −14" option subtracts 8 eight times instead of seven, the opposite off-by-one error. The claim that repeated subtraction "can never go negative" ignores that subtracting enough times from any starting value eventually gives a negative result.
- (b) (x − 5)(x + 2) — We need two numbers that multiply to −10 and add to −3: these are −5 and 2, since −5 × 2 = −10 and −5 + 2 = −3. So x² − 3x − 10 = (x − 5)(x + 2). A candidate who swaps the signs, using +5 and −2, gets (x + 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² + 3x − 10 — the wrong middle term. A candidate who picks the factor pair 1 and 10 instead of 2 and 5 gets (x − 10)(x + 1), which expands to x² − 9x − 10. A candidate who makes both factors negative gets (x − 5)(x − 2), which expands to x² − 7x + 10 — the wrong sign on the constant term.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.