Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) Formula A gives £39 and Formula B gives £39, and since 3(2n + 5) expands to 6n + 15 for every value of n, the stallholder is correct. — Formula A: 3(2 × 4 + 5) = 3 × 13 = £39. Formula B: 6 × 4 + 15 = 24 + 15 = £39. Expanding Formula A algebraically gives 3(2n + 5) = 6n + 15, which is identical to Formula B for every value of n, not just n = 4, so the stallholder is correct — this is an identity, not a coincidence. The option giving £29 for Formula A comes from multiplying only the 2n by 3 and forgetting to also multiply the 5, then adding the unmultiplied 5: 3 × 2 × 4 = 24, + 5 = 29. The two options that reach the correct numbers but reject the stallholder's claim both use faulty reasoning — matching values at one value of n, or counting terms, does not decide whether two expressions are identical for every n; expanding the bracket does.
- (c) Week 16, £37,000 — y = f(x − 6) − 8000 combines a horizontal translation of 6 units RIGHT (subtracting 6 inside the brackets) with a vertical translation of £8000 DOWN (subtracting 8000 outside). Applying both to the maximum (10, 45000): 10 + 6 = 16, so the new maximum is in week 16. And 45000 − 8000 = 37000, so the maximum weekly profit is £37,000.
- (d) a/2 — Method: write both terms over the same denominator, subtract the numerators, then cancel the fraction down. Working: 6 is a multiple of 3, so a/3 is rewritten as 2a/6; the calculation becomes 5a/6 − 2a/6 = 3a/6, and dividing numerator and denominator by 3 gives a/2. Answer: a/2. The distractors: 4a/3 comes from subtracting the denominators as well as the numerators, giving (5 − 1)a over (6 − 3); 2a/3 comes from subtracting 1 from 5 without first rewriting a/3 as 2a/6, giving 4a/6; 7a/6 comes from adding the two fractions instead of subtracting them, giving 5a/6 + 2a/6.
- (a) 45 — The ratio between the two given points, one power of x apart, gives b: 405 ÷ 135 = 3, so b = 3. Substituting back, at x = 1, y = A × b, so 135 = A × 3, giving A = 45. Giving the common ratio b itself instead of A confuses which unknown was asked for and produces 3 — wrong, because the question asks for A, not b. Giving 135 instead treats the first given point as the y-intercept and reads A off it directly — wrong, because that point is at x = 1, not x = 0, so 135 is A × b, not A. Assuming A equals b⁰ = 1 by itself, rather than substituting a known point to solve for A, gives 1 — wrong, because b⁰ is always 1 regardless of A; A must be found using an actual (x, y) pair from the graph.
- (c) x = 0 — Expand (x + 4)² correctly: (x + 4)² = x² + 8x + 16. This equals x² + 16 only when 8x is zero, i.e. when x = 0 — at every other value of x the two expressions differ by 8x. Choosing x = 4 confuses the constant inside the bracket with the value of x that makes the expressions match. Choosing x = −4 makes the same confusion but with the sign flipped. Choosing x = 8 mistakes the coefficient of the middle term, 8x, for the value of x itself.
- (b) xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ² + 3) ÷ 5 — Starting from x² = 5x − 3, add 3 to both sides: x² + 3 = 5x. Divide both sides by 5: x = (x² + 3) ÷ 5. Writing this as an iteration gives xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ² + 3) ÷ 5. xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ² − 3) ÷ 5 comes from a sign error when moving the −3 across the equals sign — it should become +3, not stay as −3. xₙ₊₁ = 5(xₙ² + 3) comes from multiplying by 5 instead of dividing by 5 when isolating x. xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ + 3) ÷ 5 comes from dropping the index on x², using xₙ instead of xₙ².
- (b) 5 — Set n² + 4n = 45, so n² + 4n − 45 = 0. This factorises as (n + 9)(n − 5) = 0, giving n = −9 or n = 5. Since a term number must be positive, n = 5. Taking the magnitude of the rejected negative solution, 9, instead of discarding it, gives 9. Dividing 45 by the coefficient of n and ignoring the n² term entirely, 45 ÷ 4 = 11.25, rounded to the nearest whole number, gives 11. Dropping the linear term 4n and solving n² = 45 instead, the nearest whole number to √45 = 6.708 is 7.
- (a) 38 — Method: substitute the position number into the rule and follow the order of operations, so the squaring is carried out before the 2 is added. Working: n = 6 gives 6² + 2; 6² means 6 × 6 = 36, and then 2 is added to 36. Answer: 38. The distractors: 14 comes from multiplying the position by 2 instead of squaring it, 6 × 2 + 2; 36 comes from squaring correctly and then forgetting to add the 2; 64 comes from adding the 2 first and squaring afterwards, (6 + 2)².
- (a) An identity, true for every value of x — Expanding the bracket on the left gives 3x + 12, which matches the right-hand side exactly, so the statement is true for every value of x — this makes it an identity. A candidate who reasons that any statement with an equals sign must be an equation picks that option, missing that an equation is only true for particular value(s) of x, not all of them. A candidate who confuses an identity with a formula, because both relate two expressions, picks the formula option — but a formula connects two different quantities, such as area and side length, not two equivalent forms of the same expression. A candidate who assumes it can be solved for a single value of x, as with a normal equation, picks that option, not realising there is no single solution here.
- (d) (0, 4) — Method: in the form y = mx + c the constant c is the y-coordinate of the point where the line crosses the y-axis, and every point on that axis has x-coordinate 0. Working: comparing y = 2x + 4 with y = mx + c gives c = 4, and substituting x = 0 confirms y = 2 × 0 + 4 = 4, so the crossing point is (0, 4). Answer: (0, 4). The distractors: (4, 0) is the same pair of numbers written in the wrong order and is a point on the x-axis; (0, 2) comes from reading the gradient 2 as the intercept, confusing m with c; (−2, 0) is where the line crosses the x-axis, found by solving 0 = 2x + 4 instead.
- (c) The sequence diverges, moving away from x = 3 — Starting from x₀ = 2.9: x₁ = 2.9² − 6 = 2.41, x₂ = 2.41² − 6 = −0.19, x₃ = (−0.19)² − 6 = −5.96, x₄ = (−5.96)² − 6 = 29.56 — the values swing away from 3 and grow rapidly, so the sequence diverges rather than settling anywhere. Choosing 'settles towards x = 3' assumes that starting close to a root is enough for a rearrangement to converge to it, which is not always true — this rearrangement changes values too steeply near x = 3 to stay there. Choosing 'settles towards x = −2' assumes a diverging sequence must eventually land on the other root; instead it runs away to increasingly large values. Choosing 'stays constant at 2.9' ignores that applying the formula changes the value at every step.
- (c) a formula — A statement that shows how to calculate one quantity from others, using an equals sign, is a formula. P = 2l + 2w tells us how to work out the perimeter, P, from the length and width, so it is a formula. Distractor origins: 'an equation' confuses a formula linking several letters with an equation solved for one unknown value; 'an identity' confuses a formula with a statement that is true for every value of a single variable; 'an expression' forgets that an expression has no equals sign at all.
- (d) x₂ closer: f(x₂) = 0.0225, nearer to 0 — f(2.6) = 2.6² − 7 = 6.76 − 7 = −0.24, and f(2.65) = 2.65² − 7 = 7.0225 − 7 = 0.0225. The closer a value of x is to the root, the closer f(x) is to zero — regardless of sign. Since |0.0225| = 0.0225 is much smaller than |−0.24| = 0.24, x₂ = 2.65 is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: −0.24 is the smaller value' comes from comparing the SIGNED values of f(x) rather than their distances from zero — −0.24 is indeed less than 0.0225 as a number, but that does not mean x₁ is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: f(x₁) negative ⇒ nearer root' invents a rule that a negative f(x) means x is closer to the root; the sign of f(x) only tells you which side of the root x is on, not how close it is. 'x₂ is the exact root, since f(x₂) ≈ 0' misreads f(x₂) = 0.0225 as zero; the true root is √7 ≈ 2.6458, so f(2.65) is close to zero but not equal to it, and x₂ is an approximation, not the exact root.
- (a) y = 2ˣ — An exponential graph y = 2ˣ passes through (0, 1) since 2⁰ = 1, rises more and more steeply for positive x, and has the x-axis as an asymptote as x becomes very negative, since 2ˣ gets closer to 0 without ever reaching it. y = x² + 1 also passes through (0, 1) and also rises steeply for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it rises to infinity too, rather than settling towards the x-axis — mistaking any curve that gets steeper for an exponential misses this. y = x³ + 1 passes through (0, 1) and rises for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it falls towards negative infinity rather than approaching the x-axis from above. y = 1 − x² also passes through (0, 1), but it falls for large positive x rather than rising — a candidate who checks only the y-intercept, without reading the described shape of the curve, could pick this.
- (c) y = 3x + 7 — Method: the gradient is the change in y divided by the change in x with both taken in the same order, and a point whose x-coordinate is 0 gives the constant straight away because it lies on the y-axis. Working: m = (7 − 1) ÷ (0 − (−2)) = 6 ÷ 2 = 3; the point (0, 7) lies on the y-axis, so c = 7 and the line is y = 3x + 7. Answer: y = 3x + 7. The distractors: y = −3x + 7 comes from taking the y-difference as 1 − 7 while taking the x-difference as 0 − (−2), so the two subtractions run in opposite orders; y = 3x + 1 comes from using the y-coordinate of (−2, 1) as the constant instead of the point that actually lies on the y-axis; y = (1/3)x + 7 comes from writing the gradient upside down as the change in x over the change in y, 2 ÷ 6.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.