Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) h = 2A / (a + b) — Method: undo the multiplication by 1/2 by multiplying both sides by 2, then undo the multiplication by (a + b) by dividing both sides by it. Working: A = (a + b)h / 2, so multiplying both sides by 2 gives 2A = (a + b)h, then dividing both sides by (a + b) gives h = 2A / (a + b). The value h = A / (a + b) comes from forgetting to multiply by 2 to clear the 1/2 first. The value h = 2A / a + b comes from dividing only by a and leaving b outside the fraction, instead of dividing by the whole bracket (a + b). The value h = (a + b) / (2A) comes from inverting the fraction.
- (a) y = (1/4)x + 1/4 — Rearrange 4x + y = 12 to y = −4x + 12, so the path has gradient −4. The perpendicular gradient is 1/4. Substituting (3, 1) into y − 1 = (1/4)(x − 3): y = (1/4)x − 3/4 + 1 = (1/4)x + 1/4. Distractor routes: y = −4x + 13 uses the path's own gradient, −4, instead of the perpendicular gradient, giving a line PARALLEL to the path through (3, 1) rather than perpendicular to it. y = (1/4)x − 1/4 makes an arithmetic slip combining −3/4 and 1, landing on −1/4 instead of the correct 1/4. y = −(1/4)x + 1/4 takes the reciprocal of −4, which is −1/4, but forgets to change its sign, so it is not the true negative reciprocal.
- (d) 11 — f⁻¹(x) = 5 means x = f(5), since applying f to both sides undoes the inverse. f(5) = 2 × 5 + 1 = 11. Writing 2 comes from confusing f⁻¹(x) = 5 with f(x) = 5, and solving 2x + 1 = 5 instead: 2x = 4, x = 2. Writing 9 comes from finding f⁻¹(x) with a sign error, f⁻¹(x) = (x + 1)/2 instead of (x − 1)/2, then setting this equal to 5: x + 1 = 10, x = 9. Writing 6 comes from finding f⁻¹(x) without dividing by 2 at all, f⁻¹(x) = x − 1, then setting this equal to 5: x = 6.
- (c) 16 km/h — Method: total distance = 12 + 8 = 20 km. Total time = 30 + 30 + 15 = 75 minutes = 1.25 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 20 ÷ 1.25 = 16 km/h. Distractor origins: 20 km/h gives the total distance without ever dividing by the total time; 24 km/h uses only the speed of the first stage (12 km in 30 minutes), ignoring the second stage and the rest; 28 km/h averages the two separate stage speeds, 24 km/h and 32 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time.
- (b) (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) — To subtract these fractions, write them over the common denominator (x − 1)(x + 3): the numerator becomes 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1). Expanding gives 4x + 12 − 2x + 2, which simplifies to 2x + 14, so the answer is (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)). Writing (2x + 11)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from not distributing the minus sign fully across the second bracket, treating −2(x − 1) as −2x − 1 instead of −2x + 2. Writing 2/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from subtracting the two original numerators directly, 4 − 2 = 2, the same mistake as subtracting fractions without a common denominator. Writing (2x − 10)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from swapping which numerator multiplies which bracket, forming 4(x − 1) − 2(x + 3) instead of 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1).
- (c) (2n + 1)² + (2n + 3)² = (4n² + 4n + 1) + (4n² + 12n + 9) = 8n² + 16n + 10 = 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2, and n² + 2n + 1 is an integer, so the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. — Expand each square carefully: (2n + 1)² = 4n² + 4n + 1 and (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 12n + 9, since the cross term is 2 × 2n × 3 = 12n. Adding gives 8n² + 16n + 10, and factorising out 8 from every term that can hold one gives 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2; since n² + 2n + 1 is always an integer, the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. The attempt reaching 8(n² + 2n) + 10 has the correct expansion but stops the factorisation one step early — it never pulls a further 8 out of the 10 (10 = 8 + 2), so 'always 10 more than a multiple of 8' should be reduced to 'always 2 more than a multiple of 8'. The attempt reaching 2(4n² + 8n + 5) also has the correct expansion, and the factorisation is true, but 'always even' only shows the sum is a multiple of 2 — being even is necessary but nowhere near sufficient to be a multiple of 8, and the argument never finds the extra factor of 4. The fourth attempt makes an expansion slip, using (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 9 instead of 4n² + 12n + 9 — dropping the 12n cross term entirely — so it works from the wrong expression 8n² + 4n + 10 throughout, and no amount of correct working afterwards can recover the right conclusion.
- (a) The equation has one solution; the inequality has many. — Method: solve each statement. From 2x + 3 = 11, 2x = 8, so x = 4 — a single value. From 2x + 3 > 11, 2x > 8, so x > 4 — every number greater than 4 makes the inequality true, so there are many solutions. So the equation has one solution and the inequality has many. Distractor origins: swapping the two round gives the range to the equation and the single value to the inequality; saying both have exactly one solution treats the > sign as if it were an = sign; saying both have many solutions treats the equation as if it were an inequality.
- (a) 4n + 1 — Method: find the increase in cost per hour, then find the constant by adjusting the 1-hour cost. Working: the cost goes up by £4 for each extra hour (9 − 5 = 4), so the coefficient of n is 4. The constant is the 1-hour cost minus the common difference: 5 − 4 = 1. Answer: the nth term is 4n + 1. 4n + 5 comes from using the 1-hour cost, 5, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 4n − 3 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (5 − 4 − 4 = −3) instead of once. n + 4 comes from swapping the hourly increase and the constant.
- (d) 8 — Working backwards by halving (undoing the doubling), one 4-hour step at a time: 9,600 (20 h) → 4,800 (16 h) → 2,400 (12 h) → 1,200 (8 h) → 600 (4 h) → 300 (0 h). Reading these in time order — 300, 600, 1,200, 2,400, 4,800, 9,600 at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 hours — the population is still at or below 1,000 at 4 hours (600) and first goes above 1,000 at 8 hours (1,200). So the recorded population first exceeds 1,000 at 8 hours. Answering 20 just reads off the time stated in the question, without working out when the threshold was actually first crossed — wrong, because 9,600 is only the value AT 20 hours, not necessarily the first time the population passed 1,000. Answering 0 comes from recovering the starting population by dividing 9,600 by 5 (the number of 4-hour gaps up to 20 hours) instead of by 2⁵ = 32 (the correct number of halvings), giving a wrongly-inflated starting value of 9,600 ÷ 5 = 1,920 — already above 1,000 at 0 hours — wrong, because doubling means the value must be halved five times, dividing by 2 five times (2⁵ = 32), not divided once by the number of gaps. Answering 12 comes from halving back only twice, from 9,600 to 4,800 (16 h) to 2,400 (12 h), and stopping there because 2,400 is already above 1,000, without checking that 1,200 at 8 hours is also above 1,000 and occurs earlier — wrong, because the FIRST recorded time above 1,000 is the earliest such time, not the first one reached while working backwards from 20 hours.
- (d) £16.70 — The mileage charge is 2.20 × 6 = £13.20. Adding the fixed fee: £13.20 + £3.50 = £16.70. A candidate who forgets the fixed fee gives just the mileage charge, £13.20. A candidate who adds the fixed fee to the per-mile rate before multiplying by the number of miles, (3.50 + 2.20) × 6, gets £34.20. A candidate who rounds £2.20 down to £2 gets 2 × 6 + 3.50 = £15.50.
- (d) x₂ closer: f(x₂) = 0.0225, nearer to 0 — f(2.6) = 2.6² − 7 = 6.76 − 7 = −0.24, and f(2.65) = 2.65² − 7 = 7.0225 − 7 = 0.0225. The closer a value of x is to the root, the closer f(x) is to zero — regardless of sign. Since |0.0225| = 0.0225 is much smaller than |−0.24| = 0.24, x₂ = 2.65 is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: −0.24 is the smaller value' comes from comparing the SIGNED values of f(x) rather than their distances from zero — −0.24 is indeed less than 0.0225 as a number, but that does not mean x₁ is closer to the root. 'x₁ closer: f(x₁) negative ⇒ nearer root' invents a rule that a negative f(x) means x is closer to the root; the sign of f(x) only tells you which side of the root x is on, not how close it is. 'x₂ is the exact root, since f(x₂) ≈ 0' misreads f(x₂) = 0.0225 as zero; the true root is √7 ≈ 2.6458, so f(2.65) is close to zero but not equal to it, and x₂ is an approximation, not the exact root.
- (b) −0.5 — Method: gradient = change in height ÷ horizontal distance, and the height decreases so the change is negative. Working: change in height = 5 − 25 = −20, horizontal distance = 40, so gradient = −20 ÷ 40 = −0.5. Answer: the gradient is −0.5. 0.5 comes from dropping the negative sign, ignoring that the zip-line descends. 2 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the drop in height instead of the other way round. −0.8 comes from dividing the drop by the platform height, 25, instead of by the horizontal distance, 40.
- (d) 66 — 6 and (4x + 3) are correct factors of 24x + 18. — Substituting x=2 into 24x+18: 24×2+18=48+18=66. Checking the factorisation: 6×4x=24x and 6×3=18, so 6(4x+3)=24x+18, matching the original expression — 6 and (4x+3) are correctly identified as factors. A candidate who substitutes x=2 into (4x+3) but forgets to multiply by the factor 6 afterwards would compute just 4×2+3=11. A candidate who adds 24 and 18 together before multiplying by x, instead of multiplying 24 by x first, would compute (24+18)×2=84. A candidate who distributes the 6 over only the first term inside the brackets, forgetting the second, would check the factorisation as 6×4x=24x but leave the 3 unmultiplied, getting 24x+3 instead of 24x+18 — and would wrongly conclude that 6 and (4x+3) are not correct factors.
- (a) 120 m — The gradient of the second line is (0 − V)/(9 − 6) = −V/3, and this equals −8, so V = 24. The distance from t = 0 to t = 6 is the area of a trapezium with parallel sides 4 and 24 and width 6: 1/2 × (4 + 24) × 6 = 84. The distance from t = 6 to t = 9 is the area of a triangle with base 3 and height 24: 1/2 × 3 × 24 = 36. The total distance is 84 + 36 = 120 m. Using V = 8, treating the gradient's number as the missing velocity itself rather than solving −V/3 = −8 for V, gives a trapezium area of 1/2 × (4 + 8) × 6 = 36 and a triangle area of 1/2 × 3 × 8 = 12, a total of 48 m. Leaving out the 1/2 in the trapezium formula, (4 + 24) × 6 = 168, plus the correct triangle of 36, gives 204 m. Using the full 6 seconds as the triangle's base instead of the 3 seconds the second line actually lasts, 1/2 × 6 × 24 = 72, plus the correct trapezium of 84, gives 156 m.
- (c) 10 m/s — A symmetric chord gradient uses the two points either side of t = 3: (2, 40) and (4, 60). The gradient is the change in height divided by the change in time: (60 − 40) ÷ (4 − 2) = 20 ÷ 2 = 10 m/s. Using only the values either side of one gap, (2, 40) and (3, 54), instead of the full symmetric chord, gives (54 − 40) ÷ (3 − 2) = 14 m/s. Getting the correct number but dropping the time unit, leaving only metres, gives 10 m. Dividing time by height instead of height by time inverts the calculation to (4 − 2) ÷ (60 − 40) = 0.1 s/m.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.