Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 16 boys and 14 girls — Method: write the number of boys in terms of the number of girls, then use the total for the class. Working: if there are g girls then there are g + 2 boys, so g + (g + 2) = 30, that is 2g + 2 = 30, so 2g = 28 and g = 14; the number of boys is 14 + 2 = 16. Answer: 16 boys and 14 girls, which total 30 and differ by 2. The distractors: 14 boys and 16 girls comes from substituting for the wrong group, writing b + (b + 2) = 30 and then calling b the number of boys; 15 boys and 15 girls comes from halving 30 and never using the difference; 17 boys and 13 girls comes from adding the whole 2 to one half of the class and taking the whole 2 off the other half, which leaves a difference of 4.
- (a) 52 — Test successive terms: n=6 gives 6²+3=39, which is not greater than 50. n=7 gives 7²+3=52, which is greater than 50, so the first term greater than 50 is 52. A candidate who stops at n=6, before checking whether 39 actually exceeds 50, would give 39. A candidate who solves n²>50 instead of n²+3>50, ignoring the +3 in the search, would find n=8 is the first value with n²>50 (since 7²=49) and compute 8²+3=67. A candidate who computes n² by doubling n instead of squaring it would compute 2×7+3=17.
- (c) Statement (ii) — Statement (ii) opens with 'Since n(n + 1) is even', treating the very fact the proof is meant to establish as if it were already known — that is circular reasoning, assuming the conclusion to help derive itself. Statement (i) only names the two consecutive integers as n and n + 1; it makes no claim about whether their product is even, so it introduces nothing circular. Statement (iii) states the conclusion, and would be a valid final step if statement (ii) had reached 'one of n and n + 1 is even' by a genuine argument, such as considering the cases where n is even or odd separately. Saying the proof assumes nothing circular is wrong, because statement (ii)'s opening clause is exactly that assumption.
- (a) 33 — Substitute n=4 into 2n²+1: 2×4²+1=2×16+1=33. A candidate who computes n² as 2×n instead of n×n would compute 2×(2×4)+1=2×8+1=17. A candidate who correctly finds 2×16 but forgets to add the constant 1 would stop at 32. A candidate who squares the whole term 2n, rather than squaring n before multiplying by 2, would compute (2×4)²+1=64+1=65.
- (c) 3.153 — x₁ = √(4 × 1 + 1) = √5 = 2.236067977. x₂ = √(4 × 2.236067977 + 1) = √9.944271908 = 3.153453965, which rounds to 3.153. Reporting x₁ instead of x₂ gives 2.236067977, which rounds to 2.236. A sign error inside the root, using xₙ₊₁ = √(4xₙ − 1) instead of √(4xₙ + 1), gives x₁ = √3 = 1.732050808 and x₂ = √(4 × 1.732050808 − 1) = √5.928203232 = 2.434790182, which rounds to 2.435. Applying the formula in the wrong order, working out √(4xₙ) + 1 at every step instead of √(4xₙ + 1), gives x₁ = √4 + 1 = 3 and x₂ = √(4 × 3) + 1 = 4.464101615, which rounds to 4.464.
- (b) (3, 3) and (−1, −5) — Set the two expressions for y equal: x² − 6 = 2x − 3, which rearranges to x² − 2x − 3 = 0. Factorise: (x − 3)(x + 1) = 0, so x = 3 or x = −1. Substitute into the linear equation, y = 2x − 3: x = 3 gives y = 3; x = −1 gives y = −5. The points are (3, 3) and (−1, −5). Distractor routes: (3, 3) and (1, −1) comes from mis-factorising x² − 2x − 3 as (x − 3)(x − 1), giving a second root of 1 instead of −1. (3, 9) and (−1, 1) comes from finding the y-coordinate from y = x² instead of substituting back into the given line equation y = 2x − 3. (3, 3) alone stops after finding only the first root of the quadratic.
- (a) £50 — Substituting x = 200 into y = 0.15x + 20 gives y = 0.15 × 200 + 20 = 30 + 20 = £50. A candidate who forgets to add the standing charge would get only 0.15 × 200 = £30. A candidate who misplaces the decimal point in the rate, using 1.5 instead of 0.15, would get 1.5 × 200 + 20 = £320. A candidate who swaps the roles of the rate and the number of units would work out 0.15 × 20 + 200 = £203.
- (d) 2x = 10 — Method: collect the x-terms on one side and the constants on the other, keeping the equals sign balanced. Working: 5x − 3x = 8 + 2, giving 2x = 10. Answer: 2x = 10. 2x = 6 comes from a sign error moving the constant, subtracting instead of adding: 8 − 2 = 6. 8x = 6 comes from adding the x-terms instead of subtracting them (5x + 3x = 8x), alongside the constant sign error. 2x = −10 comes from a sign error moving the constant the other way: −2 − 8 = −10.
- (b) 1215 — Method: generate the terms one at a time with the term-to-term rule and compare each with 1000 as you go, stopping at the first one that passes it. Working: the terms are 5, then 5 × 3 = 15, then 45, then 135, then 405, and 405 × 3 = 1215; 405 is still below 1000 while 1215 is above it. Answer: 1215. The distractors: 405 comes from stopping at the last term that is still below 1000 instead of giving the first one above it; 3645 comes from carrying on one term too far, past the first term that passes 1000; 2187 comes from using the multiplier 3 as the first term as well, generating 3, 9, 27, 81, 243, 729, 2187 instead of the sequence described.
- (b) 319 — Substitute n = 10: 3 × 10² + 2 × 10 − 1 = 3 × 100 + 20 − 1 = 300 + 20 − 1 = 319. A sign error on the +2n term, treating it as −2n, gives 300 − 20 − 1 = 279. Working out 3 × 10² + 2 × 10 but forgetting to subtract the final 1 gives 300 + 20 = 320. Using n = 9 instead of n = 10 gives 3 × 81 + 18 − 1 = 243 + 18 − 1 = 260.
- (c) 50 — Method: the edge of the track is a circle centred on the origin, so it has equation x² + y² = r²; use the floodlight whose coordinates are given to find r², then substitute x = 0 to find where that circle meets the positive y-axis. Working: 30² + 40² = 900 + 1600 = 2500, so the edge of the track is x² + y² = 2500. Substituting x = 0 gives k² = 2500, so k = √2500 = 50, taking the positive root because k is positive. Answer: k = 50. The distractors: 2500 is r² used as though it were the radius, which would place the second floodlight fifty times too far from the centre; 70 adds the two coordinates, 30 + 40, instead of adding their squares; 40 takes the y-coordinate of the first floodlight to be the radius, which would only be true if that floodlight stood on the y-axis itself.
- (d) 12 — Method: call the younger brother's age x, write the elder brother's age in terms of x, and form an equation from the total. Working: the elder brother is x + 6, so x + (x + 6) = 30; simplifying gives 2x + 6 = 30, subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 24, and dividing by 2 gives x = 12. Checking: 12 and 18 add up to 30 and differ by 6. Answer: 12. The distractors: 18 comes from solving correctly and then giving the elder brother's age, which is not the age asked for; 15 comes from halving 30 and ignoring the 6-year difference altogether; 24 comes from taking 6 off the total, 30 − 6 = 24, and giving that as an age.
- (a) It touches the x-axis once, only at x = 4. — (x − 4)² is a square, so it equals zero only when x − 4 = 0, that is at x = 4 — the curve just touches the x-axis there rather than crossing it, since a square cannot be negative on either side to cross through. Saying it crosses at x = 4 and x = −4 wrongly introduces a plus-or-minus, as if taking a square root of x, rather than recognising the bracket is already squared and only zero once. Saying it never touches the x-axis forgets that a squared term CAN equal zero, even though it can never be negative. Saying it crosses at x = 2 and x = −2 confuses (x − 4)² with the different expression x² − 4.
- (a) 271 m — The reading at t = 12 isn't in the table, so it must be interpolated between t = 10 (35 m/s) and t = 14 (27 m/s): the velocity falls by 8 m/s over the 4-second gap, so over 2 seconds it falls by 4 m/s, giving 35 − 4 = 31 m/s. The trapezium rule then uses three strips of unequal width, 4, 6 and 2 seconds, with areas of 40, 165 and 66: 40 + 165 + 66 = 271 m. Writing 267 m comes from skipping the interpolation and using the table's t = 14 reading, 27, directly as the height at t = 12. Writing 282 m comes from treating all three strips as though they were 4 seconds wide, instead of using the true gaps of 4, 6 and 2 seconds between the readings. Writing 275 m comes from using the t = 10 reading, 35, at both ends of the final strip, instead of interpolating a new value at t = 12.
- (d) Overestimate — the curve bends upward (convex). — The first differences of the speeds are 3, 5, 7 and 9, so the second differences are 2, 2 and 2 — constant and positive, which means the speed-time graph curves upwards (is convex). On a convex curve, each straight chord used by the trapezium rule lies above the curve, so the trapezium rule overestimates the true distance. 'Underestimate — the curve bends upward' states the same correct geometry but gets the conclusion backwards — a chord above the curve means too much area is counted, not too little. 'Overestimate — the speed values are increasing' uses the wrong evidence: increasing speed alone doesn't tell you whether the curve bends up or down, only the second differences do. 'Underestimate — second differences are constant' confuses a constant second difference with a steady rate of change in speed, which isn't what the second difference of a speed-time table measures.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.