Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 3 — 2x² − 12x + 7 rewrites as 2(x² − 6x) + 7, then as 2[(x − 3)² − 9] + 7, which simplifies to 2(x − 3)² − 11, since −2 × 9 + 7 = −11. The bracket (x − 3)² is zero when x = 3, so the minimum occurs at x = 3. Treating the shift as b/a instead of b/(2a) — using 6 instead of 3 — gives x = 6, which is wrong. Reading the bracket's sign directly without negating it gives x = −3, wrong, because (x − 3)² is zero at x = 3, not x = −3. Reading off the coefficient of x itself, −12, and calling that the answer skips the completing-the-square process entirely and gives x = −12, which is wrong because b is not the turning point's x-coordinate under any circumstance. Always check: substituting your value of x should make the bracketed term equal to zero, and nothing else.
- (a) Underestimate: the chord lies below the curve — For a curve that is concave down (bending downward), the straight line joining any two points on the curve lies BELOW the curve. The trapezium's top edge is this straight line, so the trapezium's area is smaller than the true area under the curve — the trapezium rule UNDERESTIMATES the distance in this case. This is because a curve whose gradient keeps decreasing bends away from any chord joining two of its points, dropping the chord below every point of the curve in between. The reverse, a chord lying above the curve, is the rule for a concave-up curve, not this one — check which way the curve bends before deciding. The trapezium rule does not always overestimate or underestimate, and it is not exact except when the graph really is a straight line.
- (c) x = 3, y = 1 — Method: the y terms are +y and −y, so adding the two equations removes y and leaves an equation in x alone. Working: adding 2x + y = 7 and x − y = 2 gives 3x = 9, so x = 3; substituting x = 3 into x − y = 2 gives 3 − y = 2, so y = 1. Answer: x = 3, y = 1, which also satisfies 2 × 3 + 1 = 7. The distractors: x = 1, y = 3 comes from finding the two values correctly and then writing them against the wrong letters; x = 3, y = 2 comes from substituting x = 3 into 2x + y = 7 as 2 + 3 + y = 7, adding the coefficient instead of multiplying by it; x = 3, y = −1 comes from substituting into x − y = 2 as though it read x + y = 2.
- (d) 23 — Method: let the smallest integer be n, so the three consecutive integers are n, n + 1 and n + 2. Form the equation n + (n + 1) + (n + 2) = 72. Working: simplify the left side: 3n + 3 = 72, so 3n = 69, giving n = 23. Answer: 23. 24 comes from dividing 72 by 3 directly, 72 ÷ 3 = 24, which finds the middle integer rather than realising the three numbers differ. 25 comes from correctly finding n = 23 but reading off the largest integer, n + 2, instead of the smallest as asked. 21 comes from dividing first and subtracting after, (72 ÷ 3) − 3, instead of subtracting 3 before dividing by 3.
- (d) 20 km/h — Method: total distance = 9 + 21 = 30 km. Total time = 15 + 45 + 30 = 90 minutes = 1.5 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 30 ÷ 1.5 = 20 km/h. Distractor origins: 40 km/h ignores the 45-minute stop, dividing the total distance by the travel time only (30 km ÷ 45 minutes = 40 km/h); 39 km/h averages the two section speeds, 36 km/h and 42 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time; 36 km/h uses only the first section's speed (9 km in 15 minutes), ignoring the second section and the stop.
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (d) An inequality, because ≤ compares the two sides — The symbol ≤ means 'is less than or equal to', so the statement compares the sizes of the two sides instead of saying they are equal: that makes it an inequality. Solving it gives n ≤ 5, a whole range of values rather than the single value an equation would give. An identity has to be true for every value of the letter, and this fails at n = 6, so it is not one. A formula works one quantity out from another, and there is only one letter here.
- (b) 1 — First differences: 2, 4, 6, 8. Second differences: 2, 2, 2, a constant, confirming the sequence is quadratic. The coefficient of n² is half the constant second difference: 2 ÷ 2 = 1. Using the second difference itself as the coefficient, without halving it, gives 2. Halving twice, dividing the second difference by 4 instead of by 2, gives 0.5. Doubling the second difference instead of halving it, on the mistaken rule that the n² coefficient is twice the second difference, gives 2 × 2 = 4.
- (a) −1 — Reflecting y = sin x in the x-axis gives y = −sin x, so g(x) = −sin x. Since sin 90° = 1, g(90) = −1. Reading sin 90° = 1 and forgetting to apply the reflection gives 1. Misreading the angle as 0° instead of 90° gives sin 0° = 0, so 0. Confusing sin 90° with sin 30° = 0.5, then reflecting it, gives −0.5.
- (a) xₙ₊₁ = ∛(5xₙ + 3) — Starting from x³ − 5x − 3 = 0, add 5x and 3 to both sides to get x³ = 5x + 3, then take the cube root of both sides: x = ∛(5x + 3), giving the iterative formula xₙ₊₁ = ∛(5xₙ + 3). A sign error when moving the constant term across, treating x³ − 5x − 3 = 0 as x³ = 5x − 3, gives xₙ₊₁ = ∛(5xₙ − 3). Swapping the coefficient of x with the constant term gives xₙ₊₁ = ∛(3xₙ + 5), which does not come from x³ = 5x + 3 at all. Treating cubing as meaning multiply by 3 rather than raise to the power 3, and so undoing it by dividing by 3 instead of taking a cube root, gives xₙ₊₁ = (5xₙ + 3) ÷ 3.
- (c) xₙ₊₁ = ∛(9 − 4xₙ) — Method: a formula xₙ₊₁ = f(xₙ) is a correct rearrangement when the equation x = f(x) turns back into the equation you started with, so rearrange x³ + 4x − 9 = 0 by making the cube the subject. Working: x³ + 4x − 9 = 0 gives x³ = 9 − 4x, because the 4x and the 9 each change sign as they cross the equals sign; taking the cube root of both sides gives x = ∛(9 − 4x), which is the formula xₙ₊₁ = ∛(9 − 4xₙ). Answer: xₙ₊₁ = ∛(9 − 4xₙ). The distractors: ∛(9 + 4xₙ) comes from writing x³ = 9 + 4x, moving the 4x across the equals sign without changing its sign; (9 + xₙ³)/4 comes from making the linear term the subject but keeping the sign of the cube, writing 4x = 9 + x³ when the equation gives 4x = 9 − x³; ∛(9 − 4xₙ³) cubes the x in the linear term as well, changing a term the original equation never cubed.
- (a) Subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. — Method: try to solve the equation as normal and see what happens. Working: subtract 4x from both sides: 4x + 3 − 4x = 4x + 10 − 4x, giving 3 = 10. This statement is false for every value of x, so the equation has no solution. Answer: subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. "x would have to be negative" invents a constraint on x that the equation never states. "It's true for every x" confuses this equation with an identity, where both sides would simplify to the same expression. "x = 7" misreads the false statement 3 = 10 as something to solve for x, rather than recognising it means no solution exists.
- (d) n/2 + 5 — Half of n is n ÷ 2, which is written as the fraction n/2. 'More than' means add, and the addition happens after the halving, so the expression is n/2 + 5. Writing (n + 5)/2 halves the 5 as well, because everything inside a bracket is divided; writing 2n + 5 doubles n instead of halving it; writing 5n/2 multiplies half of n by 5 instead of adding 5 to it.
- (b) 9 — Subtract 14 from both sides: 4s ≤ 36. Divide both sides by 4: s ≤ 9, so the greatest number of tickets is 9. A candidate who forgets the £14 coach cost solves 4s ≤ 50, getting s ≤ 12.5, rounded down to 12. A candidate who adds the £14 instead of subtracting it solves 4s ≤ 64, getting s = 16. A candidate who miscalculates 50 − 14 as 32 solves 4s ≤ 32, getting s = 8.
- (a) 25 — Gradient = change in y ÷ change in x = (100 − 0) ÷ (4 − 0) = 100 ÷ 4 = 25. Dividing time by distance instead of distance by time gives 0.04; multiplying the two values instead of dividing gives 400; stopping at the change in distance, 100, forgets to divide by the change in time.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.