Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) n/2 + 5 — Half of n is n ÷ 2, which is written as the fraction n/2. 'More than' means add, and the addition happens after the halving, so the expression is n/2 + 5. Writing (n + 5)/2 halves the 5 as well, because everything inside a bracket is divided; writing 2n + 5 doubles n instead of halving it; writing 5n/2 multiplies half of n by 5 instead of adding 5 to it.
- (d) x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, 12) — Reflecting y = f(x) in the x-axis, to get y = −f(x), negates every y-value but leaves every x-value fixed. The x-intercepts happen where y = 0, and −0 = 0, so they are unaffected: y = −f(x) still crosses the x-axis at x = −2 and x = 6. The y-intercept is the value at x = 0: f(0) = −12, so −f(0) = 12, giving the point (0, 12) — the sign flips because the y-intercept is a nonzero y-value, unlike the roots. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from confusing −f(x) with f(−x) — reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis, which negates the x-values of the intercepts (turning −2 into 2 and 6 into −6) but leaves f(0) unchanged, since f(−0) = f(0) = −12. Writing 'x = −2, x = 6; y-intercept (0, −12)' comes from forgetting that −f(x) is a reflection at all, and assumes both intercepts stay exactly as they were. Writing 'x = 2, x = −6; y-intercept (0, 12)' correctly negates the y-intercept but wrongly negates the x-intercepts too, as if a reflection in the x-axis also flipped the sign of every x-value.
- (d) (0, 4) — Method: in the form y = mx + c the constant c is the y-coordinate of the point where the line crosses the y-axis, and every point on that axis has x-coordinate 0. Working: comparing y = 2x + 4 with y = mx + c gives c = 4, and substituting x = 0 confirms y = 2 × 0 + 4 = 4, so the crossing point is (0, 4). Answer: (0, 4). The distractors: (4, 0) is the same pair of numbers written in the wrong order and is a point on the x-axis; (0, 2) comes from reading the gradient 2 as the intercept, confusing m with c; (−2, 0) is where the line crosses the x-axis, found by solving 0 = 2x + 4 instead.
- (b) y = −(1/3)x + 2 — Method: two lines are perpendicular when the product of their gradients is −1, so the gradient of a line perpendicular to one of gradient m is the negative reciprocal, −1 divided by m. Working: reading m from y = 3x + 1 gives a gradient of 3, so the perpendicular gradient is −1 ÷ 3 = −1/3, and the line carrying that gradient is y = −(1/3)x + 2; the check 3 × (−1/3) = −1 confirms it. Answer: y = −(1/3)x + 2. The distractors: y = 3x − 4 comes from using an equal gradient, which is the test for parallel lines rather than perpendicular ones; y = (1/3)x + 2 comes from turning the gradient upside down but leaving out the change of sign, giving a product of 1 instead of −1; y = −3x + 2 comes from changing the sign of the gradient without turning it upside down, giving a product of −9.
- (a) −1 — Reflecting y = sin x in the x-axis gives y = −sin x, so g(x) = −sin x. Since sin 90° = 1, g(90) = −1. Reading sin 90° = 1 and forgetting to apply the reflection gives 1. Misreading the angle as 0° instead of 90° gives sin 0° = 0, so 0. Confusing sin 90° with sin 30° = 0.5, then reflecting it, gives −0.5.
- (d) 168 m — Split the area under the graph into two parts. The rising section (0 to 8 s) is a triangle: area = 0.5 × 8 × 12 = 48. The constant section, from 8 s to 18 s (10 s), is a rectangle: area = 12 × 10 = 120. Total distance = 48 + 120 = 168 m. Leaving out the 0.5 doubles the triangle, giving 8 × 12 + 120 = 216 m; ignoring the triangle section altogether gives only 120 m; averaging the start and final speeds over the whole 18 seconds, (0 + 12) ÷ 2 = 6, then 6 × 18 = 108 m, wrongly treats the tram as accelerating the whole time, when the graph is flat for the last 10 seconds.
- (b) 5 — Set n² + 4n = 45, so n² + 4n − 45 = 0. This factorises as (n + 9)(n − 5) = 0, giving n = −9 or n = 5. Since a term number must be positive, n = 5. Taking the magnitude of the rejected negative solution, 9, instead of discarding it, gives 9. Dividing 45 by the coefficient of n and ignoring the n² term entirely, 45 ÷ 4 = 11.25, rounded to the nearest whole number, gives 11. Dropping the linear term 4n and solving n² = 45 instead, the nearest whole number to √45 = 6.708 is 7.
- (a) x = (y + 9) / 2 — Method: undo the subtraction of 9 first, then undo the multiplication by 2. Working: y = 2x − 9, so adding 9 to both sides gives y + 9 = 2x, then dividing both sides by 2 gives x = (y + 9) / 2. The value x = (y − 9) / 2 comes from a sign error, keeping the −9 instead of moving it to +9. The value x = 2(y + 9) comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing. The value x = y / 2 + 9 comes from dividing by 2 before adding 9, the wrong order of operations, instead of dividing the whole bracket.
- (a) y = 2ˣ — An exponential graph y = 2ˣ passes through (0, 1) since 2⁰ = 1, rises more and more steeply for positive x, and has the x-axis as an asymptote as x becomes very negative, since 2ˣ gets closer to 0 without ever reaching it. y = x² + 1 also passes through (0, 1) and also rises steeply for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it rises to infinity too, rather than settling towards the x-axis — mistaking any curve that gets steeper for an exponential misses this. y = x³ + 1 passes through (0, 1) and rises for positive x, but as x becomes very negative it falls towards negative infinity rather than approaching the x-axis from above. y = 1 − x² also passes through (0, 1), but it falls for large positive x rather than rising — a candidate who checks only the y-intercept, without reading the described shape of the curve, could pick this.
- (c) n = 4 — Testing n = 4: 4² = 16, and 16 + 4 + 1 = 21, and 21 = 3 × 7 is not a prime number, so this value disproves the claim. Testing n = 1: 1² = 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, which is prime, so it does not disprove the claim. Testing n = 2: 2² = 4, and 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, which is prime. Testing n = 3: 3² = 9, and 9 + 3 + 1 = 13, which is also prime — a counterexample has to give a result that isn't prime, and only n = 4 does that.
- (d) −11/60 — The radius from the origin to (11, 60) has gradient 60/11. The tangent is perpendicular to this radius, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal: −1 ÷ (60/11) = −11/60. Choosing 60/11 uses the radius's gradient unchanged, without applying perpendicularity. Choosing −60/11 negates the radius's gradient but forgets to take its reciprocal. Choosing 11/60 takes the reciprocal correctly but keeps the gradient positive instead of negative.
- (b) Student B's — narrower strips fit the curve more closely. — The trapezium rule replaces the curve with straight-line segments; the narrower each strip, the more closely its straight edge follows the curve, so Student B's estimate with 8 narrower strips is more likely to be closer to the true area. Reasoning from the number of arithmetic steps rather than from how well the straight lines fit the curve gives the wrong claim that Student A makes fewer rounding errors. Believing the trapezium rule is exact, rather than an estimate that improves with narrower strips, gives the wrong claim that the two are always the same. Believing wider strips smooth out the curve better, rather than following it less closely, gives the wrong claim in favour of Student A's wider strips.
- (c) r = √(A/π) — A = πr² means r has been squared and then multiplied by π. To make r the subject, first divide both sides by π to get A/π = r², then take the square root of both sides: r = √(A/π). Writing r = A/π stops after dividing by π and forgets that r is still squared — it never undoes the square. Writing r = √A/π takes the square root before dividing by π, which square-roots only the A and not the whole of A/π. Writing r = (A/π)² squares A/π instead of taking its square root — the opposite of what is needed to undo r². The correct rearrangement is r = √(A/π).
- (d) (3, 0) — Method: every point on the x-axis has y-coordinate 0, so substituting y = 0 into the equation and solving gives the x-coordinate of the crossing point. Working: 0 = 2x − 6 gives 2x = 6, so x = 6 ÷ 2 = 3 and the graph crosses the x-axis at (3, 0). Answer: (3, 0). The distractors: (0, −6) is where the graph crosses the y-axis, found by substituting x = 0 rather than y = 0; (−3, 0) comes from moving the 6 across the equals sign without changing its sign, giving 2x = −6; (6, 0) comes from reading the constant straight off as the crossing point and never dividing by the gradient 2.
- (c) 5n + 7 — Method: find the common difference between the rows, then find the constant by adjusting the first row's total. Working: each row has 5 more seats than the last, so the coefficient of n is 5. The constant is the first row's total minus the common difference: 12 − 5 = 7. Answer: the nth term is 5n + 7. 5n + 12 comes from using row 1's total, 12, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 5n + 2 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (12 − 5 − 5 = 2) instead of once. 7n + 5 comes from swapping the common difference and the constant.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.