Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the algebra statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Algebra worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 90° — The graph of y = tan x has a vertical asymptote at x = 90°, the smallest positive value for which it is undefined. tan 0° = 0, a defined value, not an undefined one — confusing where the graph equals zero with where it is undefined gives 0°. x = 270° is also a value where y = tan x is undefined, but it is not the smallest positive one, since 90° comes first. tan 45° = 1, a defined value — confusing the asymptote with the angle at which tan x = 1 gives 45°.
- (c) 5 — Method: let a be the number of adult tickets, so the number of child tickets is 9 − a. Form the equation 10a + 6(9 − a) = 74. Working: expand the bracket: 10a + 54 − 6a = 74, so 4a = 20, giving a = 5. Answer: 5 adult tickets. 4 comes from correctly finding the number of child tickets but reporting it instead of the number of adult tickets asked for. 1.25 comes from a sign error expanding the bracket, writing 10a + 54 + 6a = 74 instead of subtracting, which gives 16a = 20. 7.4 comes from dividing the total takings by the adult ticket price only, ignoring the children entirely, 74 ÷ 10.
- (b) y = −3x/4 + 25 — Method: a straight line that touches a circle at one point is a tangent there, so it is perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point; find the gradient of the radius, take its negative reciprocal, then substitute the point of contact into y − y₁ = m(x − x₁). Working: the radius from (0, 0) to (12, 16) has gradient 16 ÷ 12, which cancels to 4/3, so the tangent has gradient −3/4. Substituting gives y − 16 = −3/4(x − 12), so y − 16 = −3x/4 + 9 and y = −3x/4 + 25. Answer: y = −3x/4 + 25. The distractors: y = 3x/4 + 7 turns the gradient of the radius upside down but leaves it positive, so the perpendicular step is only half done; y = −4x/3 + 32 changes the sign of the radius gradient without turning it upside down, which is the other half left undone; y = −3x/4 − 25 uses the correct gradient but substitutes the point of contact with both signs reversed, writing y + 16 = −3/4(x + 12).
- (d) (x − 7)² + 1 is at least 1 for every x, so y is never 0 — x² − 14x + 50 = (x − 7)² − 7² + 50 = (x − 7)² + 1. Since a squared term can never be negative, (x − 7)² ≥ 0 for every real x, so y = (x − 7)² + 1 ≥ 1 for every x — y is always at least 1, so it can never equal 0, and the curve never crosses the x-axis. Claiming the discriminant is positive is wrong on the facts: b² − 4ac = (−14)² − 4(1)(50) = 196 − 200 = −4, which is NEGATIVE, not positive — a negative discriminant is in fact the standard reason a quadratic has no real roots, so this option misstates its own sign. Claiming the turning point is at (7, −1) is wrong because completing the square gives (x − 7)² + 1, so the turning point is (7, 1) — the constant is +1, not −1, and a point with a negative y-coordinate would sit BELOW the x-axis, not above it, contradicting the option's own claim. Claiming that 50 being positive is enough is wrong because it ignores the −14x term completely — a positive constant term alone does not guarantee y stays positive for every x (the expression still dips down towards its turning point before growing again, and it is the completed square that shows how far it dips, not the constant on its own).
- (a) 1.861 — x₁ = ∛(10 − 2²) = ∛6 = 1.817120593. x₂ = ∛(10 − 1.817120593²) = ∛6.698072751 = 1.885022855. x₃ = ∛(10 − 1.885022855²) = ∛6.446688837 = 1.861139399, which rounds to 1.861. Reporting x₂ instead of x₃ gives 1.885022855, which rounds to 1.885. Stopping after the first iteration and reporting x₁ instead of x₃ gives 1.817120593, which rounds to 1.817. A sign error inside the cube root, using xₙ₊₁ = ∛(10 + xₙ²) instead of ∛(10 − xₙ²), gives x₁ = ∛14 = 2.410142264, x₂ = ∛(10 + 2.410142264²) = 2.509763724, and x₃ = ∛(10 + 2.509763724²) = 2.535437381, which rounds to 2.535.
- (a) 18 — Method: substitute the value, apply the index before the multiplication, and remember that a negative number multiplied by itself gives a positive result. Working: x² = (−3) × (−3) = 9, and then 2 × 9 = 18. Answer: 18. The distractors: −18 comes from squaring only the 3 and leaving the minus sign outside the index, giving 2 × (−9); 36 comes from multiplying 2 by −3 first and squaring afterwards, giving (−6)²; −12 comes from reading x² as 2x, so that the calculation becomes 2 × 2 × (−3).
- (d) $y = x^2 - 2x - 3$ — Method: read the two x-intercepts (roots) from the graph, write the quadratic as the product of the corresponding factors, then expand. Working: the curve crosses the x-axis at x = −1 and x = 3, so the equation factorises as (x + 1)(x − 3), which expands to x² − 2x − 3. Answer: y = x² − 2x − 3. Distractor refutation: y = x² − x − 6 comes from misreading the left-hand crossing point as x = −2 instead of x = −1, giving factors (x + 2)(x − 3). y = x² − x − 2 comes from misreading the right-hand crossing point as x = 2 instead of x = 3, giving factors (x + 1)(x − 2). y = x² + 2x − 3 comes from writing the factors as (x − 1)(x + 3), swapping which root gets the plus sign and which gets the minus sign, giving the wrong sign on the x term.
- (b) 10 km — Method: find the constant speed from the graph (distance ÷ time for any point on the line), then multiply that speed by 20 minutes. Working: the line passes through (4 minutes, 2 km), so the speed is 2 ÷ 4 = 0.5 km per minute; in 20 minutes the cyclist travels 0.5 × 20 = 10 km. Answer: 10 km. Distractor refutation: 3 km comes from reading off the distance shown at the end of the plotted section (6 minutes) and stopping there, instead of extending the line to 20 minutes. 20 km comes from misreading the speed as 1 km per minute instead of 0.5 km per minute, doubling the true rate. 40 km comes from dividing 20 by the speed instead of multiplying by it, a reciprocal mix-up.
- (d) 4 — Method: collect the x terms on one side and the number terms on the other. Working: subtract 3x from both sides: 4x − 5 = 11. Add 5 to both sides: 4x = 16. Divide by 4: x = 4. Answer: 4. 0.6 comes from adding the x terms instead of subtracting when collecting them, 7x + 3x = 10x, and also subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 = 6, giving 10x = 6. 1.5 comes from correctly collecting the x terms as 4x but subtracting the constants the wrong way round, 11 − 5 instead of 11 + 5. −4 comes from moving the x terms to the wrong side, giving 3x − 7x instead of 7x − 3x, along with a matching sign error on the constants.
- (a) t = 0 or t = 4 — The ball is at ground level exactly when h = 0. From the table, h = 0 at t = 0 and at t = 4, so those are the two times. Distractor origins: t = 1 or t = 3 picks the times with equal (but non-zero) height instead of ground level; t = 2 picks the time of maximum height instead of ground level; t = 0 finds only the starting time and misses the second one.
- (d) −3 — Substitute y = 11 into y = 5 − 2x, giving 11 = 5 − 2x. Subtracting 5 from both sides gives 6 = −2x, so x = 6 ÷ (−2) = −3. A candidate who mishandles the negative sign when rearranging, treating the equation as 6 = 2x, gets x = 3. A candidate who correctly finds −2x = 6 but forgets to divide by 2 at all gets x = 6. A candidate who adds 5 and 11 instead of subtracting, getting 2x = 16, gets x = 8.
- (c) (2n + 1)² + (2n + 3)² = (4n² + 4n + 1) + (4n² + 12n + 9) = 8n² + 16n + 10 = 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2, and n² + 2n + 1 is an integer, so the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. — Expand each square carefully: (2n + 1)² = 4n² + 4n + 1 and (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 12n + 9, since the cross term is 2 × 2n × 3 = 12n. Adding gives 8n² + 16n + 10, and factorising out 8 from every term that can hold one gives 8(n² + 2n + 1) + 2; since n² + 2n + 1 is always an integer, the sum is always 2 more than a multiple of 8. The attempt reaching 8(n² + 2n) + 10 has the correct expansion but stops the factorisation one step early — it never pulls a further 8 out of the 10 (10 = 8 + 2), so 'always 10 more than a multiple of 8' should be reduced to 'always 2 more than a multiple of 8'. The attempt reaching 2(4n² + 8n + 5) also has the correct expansion, and the factorisation is true, but 'always even' only shows the sum is a multiple of 2 — being even is necessary but nowhere near sufficient to be a multiple of 8, and the argument never finds the extra factor of 4. The fourth attempt makes an expansion slip, using (2n + 3)² = 4n² + 9 instead of 4n² + 12n + 9 — dropping the 12n cross term entirely — so it works from the wrong expression 8n² + 4n + 10 throughout, and no amount of correct working afterwards can recover the right conclusion.
- (d) 7n + 5 — Method: find the rate charged per extra chair, then find the fixed part of the cost that fits hiring 1 chair. Working: the cost rises by £7 for each extra chair (19 − 12 = 7, 26 − 19 = 7, 33 − 26 = 7), so the cost has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 12, so c = 5. Answer: the cost in pounds is 7n + 5. The value 7n comes from ignoring the fixed part of the charge entirely. The value 7n + 12 comes from using the cost of 1 chair as the fixed part directly, without subtracting the per-chair rate first. The value 12n + 7 comes from swapping the roles of the cost of hiring 1 chair, £12, and the rate per extra chair, £7 — using the total for one chair as the coefficient of n and the rate as the fixed part.
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (a) Underestimate: the chord lies below the curve — For a curve that is concave down (bending downward), the straight line joining any two points on the curve lies BELOW the curve. The trapezium's top edge is this straight line, so the trapezium's area is smaller than the true area under the curve — the trapezium rule UNDERESTIMATES the distance in this case. This is because a curve whose gradient keeps decreasing bends away from any chord joining two of its points, dropping the chord below every point of the curve in between. The reverse, a chord lying above the curve, is the rule for a concave-up curve, not this one — check which way the curve bends before deciding. The trapezium rule does not always overestimate or underestimate, and it is not exact except when the graph really is a straight line.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.